Data: Fair
P Aminophenol
Other Concerns
Enhanced skin absorption, Use restrictions (high), Non-reproductive organ system toxicity (moderate), Ecotoxicology (low), and Occupational hazards (moderate)SYNONYMS
Unacceptable
Unacceptable: EWG VERIFIED products cannot contain this ingredient
p-aminophenol is a synthetic dye used in hair coloring; produced from coal tar.
Common concerns
See how this product scores for common concerns.
-
LOW_MODERATECancer
-
MODERATEAllergies & Immunotoxicity
-
LOWDevelopmental and Reproductive Toxicity
-
HIGHUse Restrictions
Ingredient concerns
- CONCERNS
- DATA SOURCES
Products with this Ingredient
| hair color and bleaching | 236 products |
| body firming lotion | 1 products |
| conditioner | 3 products |
| shampoo | 7 products |
| hair treatment/serum | 1 products |
| hair spray | 1 products |
| detangler | 1 products |
| beard care | 1 products |
| beard cleanser | 1 products |
Cancer
| CONCERN | REFERENCE |
|---|---|
| Mutagen - limited evidence | EU GHS Hazard Labeling Codes |
| Not likely to be carcinogenic in humans | Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) |
| Cancer - limited evidence | Peer Reviewed Literature |
| Cancer - limited evidence | Personal Care Products Council |
| Limited evidence of carcinogenicity | International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) |
Ecotoxicology
| CONCERN | REFERENCE |
|---|---|
| Wildlife and environmental toxicity | EU GHS Hazard Labeling Codes |
| Suspected to be an environmental toxin | Environment Canada |
Organ system toxicity (non-reproductive)
| CONCERN | REFERENCE |
|---|---|
| Classified as toxic or harmful | EU GHS Hazard Labeling Codes |
| Classified as not expected to be potentially toxic or harmful | Environment Canada |
| Classified as a high human health priority | Environment Canada |
| Limited evidence of cardiovascular or blood toxicity | US National Library of Medicine, |
Occupational hazards
| CONCERN | REFERENCE |
|---|---|
| Allowed workplace exposures restricted to low doses | EU GHS Hazard Labeling Codes |
| Limited evidence of occupational hazards | EU GHS Hazard Labeling Codes |
Data gaps
| CONCERN | REFERENCE |
|---|---|
| Risk assessment method deficiencies and data gaps - Maximum reported 'as used' concentration is basis of safety assessment by industry safety panel (Cosmetic Ingredient Review, CIR) - implicit safe concentration limit in product | Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) |
Allergies/immunotoxicity
| CONCERN | REFERENCE |
|---|---|
| Human skin toxicant or allergen - strong evidence | Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) |
| Human skin toxicant or allergen - strong evidence | Peer Reviewed Literature |
| Limited evidence of immune system toxicity or allergies | US National Library of Medicine, |
| Limited evidence of dermal toxicity or allergies | European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) |
Informational
| CONCERN | REFERENCE |
|---|---|
| Industry or government recommendations for safe use: restrictions on concentration, impurities, product types, or manufacturing methods - any | Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) |
| Industry or government recommendations for safe use: restrictions on concentration, impurities, product types, or manufacturing methods - Color Additives - Hair Dye | Personal Care Products Council |
Use restrictions
| CONCERN | REFERENCE |
|---|---|
| Violation of government restrictions - Restricted in cosmetics; use, concentration, or manufacturing restrictions - any | EU Cosmetics Directive |
| Determined safe for use in cosmetics, subject to concentration or use limitations - any | Personal Care Products Council |
Persistence and bioaccumulation
| CONCERN | REFERENCE |
|---|---|
| Not suspected to be persistent | Environment Canada |
| Not suspected to be bioaccumulative | Environment Canada |
- EU GHS Hazard Labeling Codes
- Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR)
- Peer Reviewed Literature
- Personal Care Products Council
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)
- Environment Canada
- US National Library of Medicine,
- European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)
- EU Cosmetics Directive
Understanding scores
Cosmetics and personal care products are not required to be tested for safety before being allowed on the market. The Skin Deep® scoring system was designed to help the public understand whether a product is safe to use or whether it contains ingredients of concern.
Every product and ingredient in Skin Deep gets a two-part score – one for hazard and one for data availability. The safest products score well by both measures, with a low hazard rating and a fair or better data availability rating.
HOW WE DETERMINE SCORES
Hazard score
The Skin Deep ingredient hazard score, from 1 to 10, reflects known and suspected hazards linked to the ingredients. The EWG VERIFIED® mark means a product meets EWG’s strictest criteria for transparency and health.
Data availability
The Skin Deep data availability rating reflects the number of scientific studies about the product or ingredient in the published scientific literature.