Menu Close Menu

Menu

FD&C YELLOW 5 (CI 19140) ALUMINUM LAKE

Score:

Data: None

  • Other Concerns
  • Functions
  • About the Chemical
  • Synonyms
  • Use restrictions (low), Neurotoxicity (moderate), Endocrine disruption (low), Persistence and bioaccumulation (moderate), Non-reproductive organ system toxicity (moderate), and Contamination concerns (high)

Cancer

Cancer concern is LOW

Developmental & Reproductive Toxicity

Developmental & reproductive toxicity concern is LOW

Allergies & Immunotoxicity

Allergies & immunotoxicity concern is LOW_MODERATE

Products with this Ingredient

Expand content Collapse content
lipstick967 products
eye shadow226 products
lip gloss174 products
nail polish140 products
lip liner122 products
lip balm99 products
blush89 products
eye liner82 products
bronzer/highlighter72 products
concealer55 products
facial powder55 products
brow liner55 products
foundation42 products
mascara16 products
lip balm with SPF11 products
bath oil/salts/soak10 products
lip plumper8 products
exfoliant/scrub6 products
nail treatment5 products
makeup primer5 products
glitter4 products
other eye makeup3 products
beach & sport sunscreen2 products
mouthwash2 products
hair color and bleaching2 products
bar soap2 products
fragrance for men1 products
BB cream1 products
serums & essences1 products
mask1 products
moisturizer1 products
body wash/cleanser1 products
toothpaste1 products
body oil1 products
body powder1 products
eyelash glue1 products

Contamination concerns

Expand content Collapse content

Persistence and bioaccumulation

Expand content Collapse content
Concern Reference
Deemed a human health priority even though it did not meet the strict criteria of the categorization exercise of CEPA. Flagged for persistence.Environment Canada 2015. Domestic Substance List. Appears as: listid: ECDSL-04455; Chemical_Name: 1H-Pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl) -4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-, trisodium salt; ; CAS: 1934-21-0
This chemical was NOT flagged by CEPA for further attention. Flagged for suspected persistence.Environment Canada 2015. Domestic Substance List. Appears as: listid: ECDSL-08070; Chemical_Name: C.I. Pigment yellow 100; ; CAS: 12225-21-7

Allergies/immunotoxicity

Expand content Collapse content
Concern Reference
Review article concluded that chemical caused hypersensitivity reactions.Peer Reviewed Literature 2020. Kobylewski, S. & Jacobson, M.F. 2012. Toxicology of food dyes. International journal of occupational and environmental health 18(3), 220-46.. Appears as: Substance Name: FD&C YELLOW 5;
EFSA concludes that some sensitive individuals may experience allergic reactions at dose levels within the ADI.European Food Safety Authority 2009. Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation Tartrazine (E 102). EFSA Journal 7(11), 1331.
Allergic reactions have been reported in humans.European Commission, Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) 2004. OPINION OF THE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON COSMETIC PRODUCTS AND NON-FOOD PRODUCTS INTENDED FOR CONSUMERS Concerning Acid Yellow 23. SCCNFP/0786/04.

Organ system toxicity (non-reproductive)

Expand content Collapse content
Concern Reference
Deemed a human health priority even though it did not meet the strict criteria of the categorization exercise of CEPA. Flagged for persistence.Environment Canada 2015. Domestic Substance List. Appears as: listid: ECDSL-04455; Chemical_Name: 1H-Pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl) -4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-, trisodium salt; ; CAS: 1934-21-0
Limited evidence of any toxicityKlaassen, C, M. Amdur and J. Doull (eds.). Casarett and Doull
Liver effects observed at high doses in mice.Stephanie K Meyer, George E. N. Kass, Peter G. Blain, Paul A. Jowsey, Faith M. Williams, Alistair C. Leitch, Andrew R. Axon, Anne F. Lakey, Philip M. E. Probert & Matthew C. Wright. 2017. Hepatic effects of tartrazine (E 102) after systemic exposure are independent of oestrogen receptor interactions in the mouse. Toxicology letters 273, 55-68.
This chemical was NOT flagged by CEPA for further attention. Flagged for suspected persistence.Environment Canada 2015. Domestic Substance List. Appears as: listid: ECDSL-08070; Chemical_Name: C.I. Pigment yellow 100; ; CAS: 12225-21-7

Neurotoxicity

Expand content Collapse content
Concern Reference
Review article concluded that chemical can cause hyperactivity in children.Peer Reviewed Literature 2020. Kobylewski, S. & Jacobson, M.F. 2012. Toxicology of food dyes. International journal of occupational and environmental health 18(3), 220-46.. Appears as: Substance Name: FD&C YELLOW 5;
EFSA finds that there is "limited evidence" that Yellow 5 in a mixture with other synthetic colours and sodium benzoate has a "small and statistically significant effect on activity and attention in children selected from the general population."European Food Safety Authority 2009. Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation Tartrazine (E 102). EFSA Journal 7(11), 1331.
A peer-reviewed study found that this substance caused neurobehavioral effects in animals at high doses.Toyohito Tanaka 2006. Reproductive and neurobehavioural toxicity study of tartrazine administered to mice in the diet. Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association 44(2), 179-87.
A peer-reviewed study found that this substance caused neurobehavioral effects in animals at high doses.Kamel, MM. & El-lethey, H.S. 2011. The Potential Health Hazard of Tartrazine and Levels of Hyperactivity, Anxiety-Like Symptoms, Depression and Anti-social behaviour in Rats. Journal of American Science 7(6), 1211-8.

Cancer

Expand content Collapse content
Concern Reference
A review article conclused that this substance may be carcinogenic at high or cumulative exposures, which are unlikely to occur.Petra Amchova, Hana Kotolova & Jana Ruda-Kucerova 2015. Health safety issues of synthetic food colorants. Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP 73(3), 914-22.
Genotoxicity observed in in vitro testing with human cells.Bruno Moreira Soares, Taíssa Maíra Thomaz Araújo, Jorge Amando Batista Ramos, Laine Celestino Pinto, Bruna Meireles Khayat, Marcelo De Oliveira Bahia, Raquel Carvalho Montenegro, Rommel Mario Rodríguez Burbano & André Salim Khayat 2015. Effects on DNA repair in human lymphocytes exposed to the food dye tartrazine yellow. Anticancer research 35(3), 1465-74.
Little evidence of genotoxicity in in vitro testing.European Commission, Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) 2004. OPINION OF THE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON COSMETIC PRODUCTS AND NON-FOOD PRODUCTS INTENDED FOR CONSUMERS Concerning Acid Yellow 23. SCCNFP/0786/04.
Not found to be carcinogenic in animal testing.European Commission, Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) 2004. OPINION OF THE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON COSMETIC PRODUCTS AND NON-FOOD PRODUCTS INTENDED FOR CONSUMERS Concerning Acid Yellow 23. SCCNFP/0786/04.
No genotoxicity observed in an in vivo assay with mice.Martine Poul, Gérard Jarry, Mostafa Ould Elhkim & Jean-Michel Poul 2009. Lack of genotoxic effect of food dyes amaranth, sunset yellow and tartrazine and their metabolites in the gut micronucleus assay in mice. Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association 47(2), 443-8.

Endocrine disruption

Expand content Collapse content
Concern Reference
A peer-reviewed study reports this substance shows estrogenic activity in a human cell line.Andrew Axon, Felicity E B. May, Luke E. Gaughan, Faith M. Williams, Peter G. Blain & Matthew C. Wright. 2012. Tartrazine and sunset yellow are xenoestrogens in a new screening assay to identify modulators of human oestrogen receptor transcriptional activity. Toxicology 298(1-3), 40-51.
Possible endocrine activity suggested by cellular assays and models.National Toxicology Program (NTP) 2015. EWG Toxcast Analysis. Appears as: CAS: 1934-21-0; Chemical_Name: FD&C Yellow 5

Use restrictions

Expand content Collapse content
Concern Reference
Color additive provisionally approved for use in cosmeticsUS. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2015. Color Additive Status. Appears as: listid: COLOR-099; Chemical_Name: D&C Lakes; ;

Developmental/reproductive toxicity

Expand content Collapse content
Concern Reference
Developmental neurotoxicity observed in chicken embryos.Aysegul Ozdemir Ovalioglu, Talat Cem Ovalioglu, Gokhan Canaz, Aysegul Esen Aydin, Sema Arslan, Mehmet Sar & Erhan Emel 2020. Effects of Tartrazine on Neural Tube Development in the Early Stage of Chicken Embryos. Turkish neurosurgery 30(4), 583-587.
No developmental toxicity was observed in fish.Vani Joshi & Pancharatna Katti 1900. Developmental Toxicity Assay for Food Additive Tartrazine Using Zebrafish ( Danio rerio) Embryo Cultures. International journal of toxicology 37(1), 38-44.

Data gaps

Expand content Collapse content
Concern Reference
0 studies in PubMed science library may include information on the toxicity of this chemicalNLM PubMed

Ecotoxicology

Expand content Collapse content
Concern Reference
This chemical was NOT flagged by CEPA for further attention. Flagged for suspected persistence.Environment Canada 2015. Domestic Substance List. Appears as: listid: ECDSL-08070; Chemical_Name: C.I. Pigment yellow 100; ; CAS: 12225-21-7

Multiple, additive exposure sources

Expand content Collapse content
Concern Reference
Designated as safe for general or specific, limited use in foodFDA Everything Added to Food

Informational

Expand content Collapse content
Concern Reference
Industry or government recommendations for safe use: restrictions on concentration, impurities, product types, or manufacturing methods - Color additive approved by FDA for use in cosmeticsFDA Color Additive Status
Industry or government recommendations for safe use: restrictions on concentration, impurities, product types, or manufacturing methods - Color Additives Lakes - Batch Certified by the U.S. Food and Drug AdministrationCTFA International Cosmetic Ingredient Dictionary and Handbook

Data Sources

  • Environment Canada 2015. Domestic Substance List. Appears as: listid: ECDSL-04455; Chemical_Name: 1H-Pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl) -4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-, trisodium salt; ; CAS: 1934-21-0
  • Environment Canada 2015. Domestic Substance List. Appears as: listid: ECDSL-08070; Chemical_Name: C.I. Pigment yellow 100; ; CAS: 12225-21-7
  • Peer Reviewed Literature 2020. Kobylewski, S. & Jacobson, M.F. 2012. Toxicology of food dyes. International journal of occupational and environmental health 18(3), 220-46.. Appears as: Substance Name: FD&C YELLOW 5;
  • European Food Safety Authority 2009. Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation Tartrazine (E 102). EFSA Journal 7(11), 1331.
  • European Commission, Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) 2004. OPINION OF THE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON COSMETIC PRODUCTS AND NON-FOOD PRODUCTS INTENDED FOR CONSUMERS Concerning Acid Yellow 23. SCCNFP/0786/04.
  • Klaassen, C, M. Amdur and J. Doull (eds.). Casarett and Doull
  • Stephanie K Meyer, George E. N. Kass, Peter G. Blain, Paul A. Jowsey, Faith M. Williams, Alistair C. Leitch, Andrew R. Axon, Anne F. Lakey, Philip M. E. Probert & Matthew C. Wright. 2017. Hepatic effects of tartrazine (E 102) after systemic exposure are independent of oestrogen receptor interactions in the mouse. Toxicology letters 273, 55-68.
  • Toyohito Tanaka 2006. Reproductive and neurobehavioural toxicity study of tartrazine administered to mice in the diet. Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association 44(2), 179-87.
  • Kamel, MM. & El-lethey, H.S. 2011. The Potential Health Hazard of Tartrazine and Levels of Hyperactivity, Anxiety-Like Symptoms, Depression and Anti-social behaviour in Rats. Journal of American Science 7(6), 1211-8.
  • Petra Amchova, Hana Kotolova & Jana Ruda-Kucerova 2015. Health safety issues of synthetic food colorants. Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP 73(3), 914-22.
  • Bruno Moreira Soares, Taíssa Maíra Thomaz Araújo, Jorge Amando Batista Ramos, Laine Celestino Pinto, Bruna Meireles Khayat, Marcelo De Oliveira Bahia, Raquel Carvalho Montenegro, Rommel Mario Rodríguez Burbano & André Salim Khayat 2015. Effects on DNA repair in human lymphocytes exposed to the food dye tartrazine yellow. Anticancer research 35(3), 1465-74.
  • Martine Poul, Gérard Jarry, Mostafa Ould Elhkim & Jean-Michel Poul 2009. Lack of genotoxic effect of food dyes amaranth, sunset yellow and tartrazine and their metabolites in the gut micronucleus assay in mice. Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association 47(2), 443-8.
  • Andrew Axon, Felicity E B. May, Luke E. Gaughan, Faith M. Williams, Peter G. Blain & Matthew C. Wright. 2012. Tartrazine and sunset yellow are xenoestrogens in a new screening assay to identify modulators of human oestrogen receptor transcriptional activity. Toxicology 298(1-3), 40-51.
  • National Toxicology Program (NTP) 2015. EWG Toxcast Analysis. Appears as: CAS: 1934-21-0; Chemical_Name: FD&C Yellow 5
  • US. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2015. Color Additive Status. Appears as: listid: COLOR-099; Chemical_Name: D&C Lakes; ;
  • Aysegul Ozdemir Ovalioglu, Talat Cem Ovalioglu, Gokhan Canaz, Aysegul Esen Aydin, Sema Arslan, Mehmet Sar & Erhan Emel 2020. Effects of Tartrazine on Neural Tube Development in the Early Stage of Chicken Embryos. Turkish neurosurgery 30(4), 583-587.
  • Vani Joshi & Pancharatna Katti 1900. Developmental Toxicity Assay for Food Additive Tartrazine Using Zebrafish ( Danio rerio) Embryo Cultures. International journal of toxicology 37(1), 38-44.
  • NLM (National Library of Medicine). 2012. PubMed online scientific bibliography data. http://www.pubmed.gov.
  • FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration). 2008. EAFUS [Everything Added to Food]: A Food Additive Database. FDA Office of Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.
  • FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) 2006. Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. Color Additive Status List. September 2006.
  • CTFA (Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association). 2006. International Cosmetic Ingredient Dictionary and Handbook, 11th Edition. Color Additive Information. Washington, DC.

About this Ingredient's Score Range

  • Products with the EWG VERIFIED mark have met the program’s impurity and use restrictions based on EWG's review of the company's data.

ABOUT THE SKIN DEEP® RATINGS

EWG provides information on personal care product ingredients from the published scientific literature, to supplement incomplete data available from companies and the government. The ratings below indicate the relative level of concern posed by exposure to the ingredients in this product - not the product itself - compared to other product formulations. The ratings reflect potential health hazards but do not account for the level of exposure or individual susceptibility, factors which determine actual health risks, if any. Learn more | Legal Disclaimer

ABOUT EWG VERIFIED™

Beyond providing Skin Deep® as an educational tool for consumers, EWG offers its EWG VERIFIED™ mark as a quick and easily identifiable way of conveying personal care products that meet EWG's strict health criteria. Before a company can use EWG VERIFIED™ on such products, the company must show that it fully discloses the products' ingredients on their labels or packaging, they do not contain EWG ingredients of concern, and are made with good manufacturing practices, among other criteria. Note that EWG receives licensing fees from all EWG VERIFIED™ member companies that help to support the important work we do. Learn more | Legal Disclaimer