Sign up to receive email updates, action alerts, health tips, promotions to support our work and more from EWG. You can opt-out at any time. [Privacy]

 

5 People Who Shouldn’t Be in Charge of Protecting Us From Toxic Chemicals

Friday, January 26, 2018

You wouldn’t want an arsonist running the fire department. You wouldn’t hire a builder who’s never raised a hammer. But President Trump has put people in charge of protecting Americans from toxic chemicals who have either spent their careers working against stronger public health regulations, or who have no environmental qualifications or experience at all.  

As Oklahoma attorney general, Scott Pruitt repeatedly sued the Environmental Protection Agency to block clean air rules. Now he’s running it. Pruitt’s top deputy for chemical safety, a former bigwig with the chemical industry’s powerful lobbying group, was called out by a House committee for her “very disturbing” attempts to undermine EPA science. And when Trump’s pick for White House environmental czar was the top environmental regulator in Texas, her commission falsified test data to bring small towns into “compliance” with federal drinking water safety standards – in fact, they were in violation.

Theirs aren’t the only faces in Trump’s gallery of regulatory rogues. One year into Trump’s war on public health, here’s a closer look.

Scott Pruitt, EPA Administrator

Pruitt has already proven to be the most hostile head of the EPA in its nearly 50-year history. Carol Browner, who ran the EPA during the Clinton administration, predicts it will take “20 to 30” years to rebuild the agency’s full capacity in the wake of Pruitt and Trump’s tenure.

Nancy Beck, Deputy Assistant Administrator for EPA’s Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention Division

When she was appointed last spring, EWG called Beck “the scariest Trump appointee you’ve never heard of.” The National Academy of Sciences once called her proposed approach to chemical safety “fundamentally flawed.”

  • As the top lobbyist for the American Chemistry Council, Beck consistently fought for weaker chemical safety laws.
  • Since her appointment, Beck has significantly weakened proposed rules to assess chemical safety in favor of the chemical industry.
  • Also to favor industry interests, she has fundamentally changed the way the EPA approves new chemicals before they come on the market.

Kathleen Hartnett White, nominated to run the White House Council on Environmental Quality

During her Senate confirmation hearing, Hartnett White was unable to answer the most rudimentary questions around the science of climate change, despite years of speaking out as a skeptic. She thinks more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is a good thing. 

  • When Hartnett White was the top environmental regulator in Texas, her commission falsified data showing that tens of thousands of people were drinking tap water with dangerous levels of radiation.
  • In a news interview, she defended the decision to ignore the EPA’s radiation standards for drinking water, saying, “I believe local first, state second, federal government third.”
  • In her confirmation process, Hartnett White likely plagiarized answers to written questions from members of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.

Albert “Kell” Kelly, Senior Advisor in charge of EPA’s Superfund Task Force

Dana Baiocco, Trump-appointed member of the Consumer Product Safety Commission

As far as we can tell, none of them has ever advocated on behalf of stronger public health or environmental laws. You could stand on a sidewalk in any city and have a good chance of finding people more qualified and committed to protecting Americans from toxic chemicals than these folks.

--

Photos courtesy of Gage Skidmore via Flickr.com, U.S. Senate Committee Channel, AP Images, C-SPAN and Consumer Product Safety Commission