header graphic


EWG INVESTIGATION

 

Findings

About The Data

News Release

EWG Statement, 03/10/2008

Related News Clips


WHAT'S IN YOUR WATER?

 

Find Your Water Company


NATIONAL SUMMARY

 

Quality Varies Across the U.S.


CONTAMINANTS DATABASE

 

Find a Contaminant

 

 

Credits

 

Sign up to receive email updates from EWG






 

National Contaminant Report

1,2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP)

Return to National Report

Status: Regulated - EPA has established a maximum legal limit in tapwater for this contaminant.

1,2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) is a fumigant used on soybeans, cotton, pineapples and orchards. Potential health impacts associated with 1,2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) include cancer, developmental toxicity, endocrine toxicity, gastrointestinal or liver toxicity, kidney toxicity, neurotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, respiratory toxicity, and skin sensitivity. [read more]

Sources of 1,2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP):
AgricultureAgriculture (pesticides, fertilizer, factory farms)

An Environmental Working Group analysis of 1,2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) tests reported by 23,744 public water suppliers in 41 states shows that between 1998 and 2003, 6.5 million people in 178 communities drank water contaminated with 1,2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP). In 163 of these communities, tap water was contaminated at levels above health-based thresholds.

Exposure Summary

6,492,596

People drinking water contaminated with 1,2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP)

178

Communities served water contaminated with 1,2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP)

4,388,732

People drinking water contaminated with 1,2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) over health based limits

163

Communities served water with 1,2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) above health based limits


Table. 1,2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) Exposure by State

4.4 million Americans in 15 states were served tap water contaminated with 1,2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) at levels above health-based limits between 1998 and 2003.

StateWater suppliers with 1,2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) contaminationWater suppliers reporting 1,2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) above health-based limits
SystemsPopulationSystemsPopulation
California1213,981,9811113,440,467
Florida10538,75410538,754
Alabama9138,9979138,997
South Carolina676,205676,205
Kentucky251,270251,270
Arizona61,582,600240,600
New York428,079428,079
Illinois840,655720,305
North Carolina318,089318,089
Indiana313,920313,920
New Jersey213,885213,885
Pennsylvania16,00016,000
Colorado11,70011,700
Wisconsin13851385
New Mexico176176
Total1786,492,5961634,388,732

Table. The most polluted communities

4.4 million Americans in 163 communities were served tap water contaminated with 1,2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) above health based limits between 1998 and 2003

Ranked by highest average 1,2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) level

RankSystem Population Served Positive test results of total reported tests Average Level
(Range)
1Norwood Village
Norwood, NY
2,2001 of 13.13 ppb
(3.13 to 3.13 ppb)
2Happy Acres
MERCED, CA
241 of 11.5 ppb
(1.5 to 1.5 ppb)
3Western Sky Mobile Home Park
San Francisco, CA
1085 of 50.91 ppb
(0.73 to 1.18 ppb)
4Evergreen Hills Mhp
Blossvale, NY
781 of 10.7 ppb
(0.7 to 0.7 ppb)
5Stonegate Mobile Home Park
Roseville, CA
1251 of 30.63 ppb
(0 to 1.9 ppb)
6Lee Valley Trailer Park
Blossvale, NY
1261 of 10.5 ppb
(0.5 to 0.5 ppb)
7Central Valley Water Company
Tulare, CA
4001 of 10.45 ppb
(0.45 to 0.45 ppb)
8Son Shine Properties
Edison, CA
4003 of 30.37 ppb
(0.3 to 0.41 ppb)
9Sunnyside Estates Water System
Stockton, CA
761 of 10.36 ppb
(0.36 to 0.36 ppb)
10Valley Care and Guidance
Fresno, CA
1585 of 130.31 ppb
(0 to 1.92 ppb)

  Next -->

Health based limits for 1,2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP)

Health LimitLimit ValueLimit Description
Maximum Contaminant Limit (MCL)0.2 ppbThe enforceable standard which defines the highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as close to health-based limits (Maximum Contaminant Level Goals, or MCLGs) as feasible using the best available analytical and treatment technologies and taking cost into consideration. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Maximum Contaminant Limit Goal (MCLG)0 ppbA non-enforceable health goal that is set at a level at which no known or anticipated adverse effect on the health of persons occurs and which allows an adequate margin of safety. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
One in ten thousand (10-4) Cancer Risk3 ppbThe concentration of a chemical in drinking water corresponding to an excess estimated lifetime cancer risk of 1 in 10,000. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
California Public Health Goals<0.01 ppbDefined by the State of California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) as the level of contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. For acutely toxic substances, levels are set at which scientific evidence indicates that no known or anticipated adverse effects on health will occur, plus an adequate margin-of safety. PHGs for carcinogens or other substances which can cause chronic disease shall be based solely on health effects without regard to cost impacts and shall be set at levels which OEHHA has determined do not pose any significant risk to health.
Children's health-based limit for 1-day exposure200 ppbConcentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse, noncarcinogenic health effects for up to one day of exposure. The One-Day health-based limit (or Health Advisory, HA) is typically set to protect a 10-kg child consuming 1 liter of water per day. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Children's health-based limit for 10-day exposure50 ppbConcentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse, noncarcinogenic effects for up to ten days of exposure. The Ten-Day health-based limit (or Health Advisory, HA) is typically set to protect a 10-kg child consuming 1 liter of water per day. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Testing Summary for 1,2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP)

Water suppliers report an average of 0.6 1,2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) tests per year. 16,007 water suppliers failed to report any 1,2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) tests at all.

Are tests routinely required for 1,2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) by federal law?Yes
Water suppliers reporting tests for 1,2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) (1998-2003):23,744 of 39,751
Average testing rate for water supplier reporting tests (1998-2003):0.6 per year


1,2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) Violations

Table. 2.1 percent of all water suppliers violated safe drinking water standards for 1,2 Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) between 1998 and 2003

Violation TypeViolationsSystems
Any Violation (1998-2003)2,0641,175
(2.1% of all suppliers)
Testing violations (1998-2003)2,0561,175
(2.1% of all suppliers)
Reporting violations (1998-2003)77
(< 0.1% of all suppliers)
Violations of tap water pollution standards (1998-2003)11
(< 0.1% of all suppliers)