EWG INVESTIGATION
Findings
About The Data
News Release
EWG Statement, 03/10/2008
Related News Clips
WHAT'S IN YOUR WATER?
Find Your Water Company
NATIONAL SUMMARY
Quality Varies Across the U.S.
CONTAMINANTS DATABASE
Find a Contaminant
Credits
Sign up to receive email updates from EWG
|
|
Status: Unregulated - EPA has not established a maximum legal limit in tapwater for this contaminant. Dicamba is an herbicide for agriculture, rangeland, pasture, industry; it is used for corn, wheat and other crops. Potential health impacts associated with Dicamba include developmental toxicity and reproductive toxicity. [read more] Sources of Dicamba:  | Agriculture (pesticides, fertilizer, factory farms) |
An Environmental Working Group analysis of Dicamba tests reported by 15,872 public water suppliers in 38 states shows that between 1998 and 2003, 341 thousand people in 48 communities drank water contaminated with Dicamba. Dicamba remains unregulated in tap water, without a maximum legal limit. Exposure Summary 340,569 | People drinking water contaminated with Dicamba | 48 | Communities served water contaminated with Dicamba |
|
Table. Dicamba Exposure by State341 thousand Americans in 11 states were served tap water contaminated with Dicamba between 1998 and 2003. | State | Water suppliers with Dicamba contamination |
|---|
| Systems | Population |
|---|
| Illinois | 18 | 112,659 | | North Carolina | 10 | 96,967 | | Ohio | 1 | 48,000 | | Wisconsin | 4 | 29,798 | | Iowa | 4 | 17,034 | | Washington | 2 | 14,584 | | Arizona | 2 | 11,316 | | New Mexico | 2 | 6,550 | | California | 3 | 3,525 | | Minnesota | 1 | 70 | | Pennsylvania | 1 | 66 | | Total | 48 | 340,569 |
|---|
Table. The most polluted communities341,000 Americans in 48 communities were served tap water contaminated with Dicamba between 1998 and 2003 Ranked by highest average Dicamba level | Rank | System
| Population Served
| Positive test results of total reported tests
| Average Level (Range) |
|---|
| 1 | Papillon S / D Cary, NC | 25 | 1 of 2 | 1.1 ppb (0 to 2.2 ppb) | | 2 | Roseland Coop Well Blomkest, MN | 70 | 1 of 11 | 1.09 ppb (0 to 12 ppb) | | 3 | USMC Lejeune - Hadnot Point Camp Lejeune, NC | 35,000 | 1 of 7 | 0.91 ppb (0 to 6.4 ppb) | | 4 | Magnolia Spring - Southfork S / D Denver, NC | 315 | 1 of 2 | 0.7 ppb (0 to 1.4 ppb) | | 5 | Barto's Trailer Court Hughesville, PA | 66 | 1 of 2 | 0.5 ppb (0 to 1 ppb) | | 6 | Beneficial Water Pasco, WA | 84 | 1 of 1 | 0.4 ppb (0.4 to 0.4 ppb) | | 7 | Sunset Hills S / D Denver, NC | 64 | 1 of 4 | 0.33 ppb (0 to 1.3 ppb) | | 8 | Shipman Shipman, IL | 690 | 2 of 2 | 0.32 ppb (0.25 to 0.39 ppb) | | 9 | Oakwood Oakwood, IL | 1,502 | 3 of 6 | 0.31 ppb (0 to 0.97 ppb) | | 10 | Ashley Hills North S / D Garner, NC | 430 | 1 of 4 | 0.25 ppb (0 to 1 ppb) |
Next --> Health based limits for Dicamba
| Health Limit | Limit Value | Limit Description |
|---|
| Children's health-based limit for 1-day exposure | 300 ppb | Concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse, noncarcinogenic health effects for up to one day of exposure. The One-Day health-based limit (or Health Advisory, HA) is typically set to protect a 10-kg child consuming 1 liter of water per day. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | | Children's health-based limit for 10-day exposure | 300 ppb | Concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse, noncarcinogenic effects for up to ten days of exposure. The Ten-Day health-based limit (or Health Advisory, HA) is typically set to protect a 10-kg child consuming 1 liter of water per day. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | | Lifetime health-based limit, non-cancer risk | 200 ppb | Concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse, noncarcinogenic health effects for a lifetime of exposure. The Lifetime health-based limit (or Health Advisory, HA) is based on exposure for a a 70-kg adult consuming 2 liters of water per day. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | | Drinking Water Equivalent Level | 1000 ppb | A lifetime exposure concentration protective of adverse, noncarcinogenic health effects, that assumes all of the exposure to a contaminant is from drinking water. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | Testing Summary for Dicamba Water suppliers report an average of 0.4 Dicamba tests per year. 23,879 water suppliers failed to report
any Dicamba tests at all. | Are tests routinely required for Dicamba by federal law? | No | | Water suppliers reporting tests for Dicamba (1998-2003): | 15,872 of 39,751 | | Average testing rate for water supplier reporting tests (1998-2003): | 0.4 per year |
|
Dicamba Violations Because Dicamba is unregulated in tap water, no violations are
recorded in EPA's violations database, the Safe Drinking Water Information
System. Under the federal tap water law, water suppliers are not required
to routinely test for Dicamba, and any level is legal in tap water.
|