EWG INVESTIGATION
Findings
About The Data
News Release
EWG Statement, 03/10/2008
Related News Clips
WHAT'S IN YOUR WATER?
Find Your Water Company
NATIONAL SUMMARY
Quality Varies Across the U.S.
CONTAMINANTS DATABASE
Find a Contaminant
Credits
Sign up to receive email updates from EWG
|
|
Status: Regulated - EPA has established a maximum legal limit in tapwater for this contaminant. Asbestos is a mineral fiber from decay of asbestos cement in water mains. Potential health impacts associated with Asbestos include cancer, immunotoxicity, and respiratory toxicity. [read more] Sources of Asbestos:  | Water Treatment and Distribution Byproducts (pipes and fixtures, treatment chemicals and byproducts) |
An Environmental Working Group analysis of Asbestos tests reported by 2,533 public water suppliers in 26 states shows that between 1998 and 2003, 8.6 million people in 147 communities drank water contaminated with Asbestos. In 2 of these communities, tap water was contaminated at levels above health-based thresholds. Exposure Summary 8,582,708 | People drinking water contaminated with Asbestos | 147 | Communities served water contaminated with Asbestos | 6,748 | People drinking water contaminated with Asbestos over health based limits | 2 | Communities served water with Asbestos above health based limits |
|
Table. Asbestos Exposure by State6,748 Americans in 2 states were served tap water contaminated with Asbestos at levels above health-based limits between 1998 and 2003. | State | Water suppliers with Asbestos contamination | Water suppliers reporting Asbestos above health-based limits |
|---|
| Systems | Population | Systems | Population |
|---|
| Arizona | 6 | 1,896,905 | 1 | 6,695 | | California | 21 | 4,431,881 | 1 | 53 | | Tennessee | 37 | 1,158,987 | 0 | 0 | | Florida | 32 | 782,164 | 0 | 0 | | Washington | 27 | 215,853 | 0 | 0 | | South Carolina | 8 | 43,971 | 0 | 0 | | Utah | 1 | 17,500 | 0 | 0 | | Alaska | 2 | 9,647 | 0 | 0 | | Pennsylvania | 1 | 6,000 | 0 | 0 | | Nevada | 1 | 5,800 | 0 | 0 | | Iowa | 2 | 4,694 | 0 | 0 | | New York | 1 | 4,200 | 0 | 0 | | Idaho | 1 | 2,340 | 0 | 0 | | Maine | 1 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | | Wisconsin | 4 | 841 | 0 | 0 | | Indiana | 2 | 200 | 0 | 0 | | Total | 147 | 8,582,708 | 2 | 6,748 |
|---|
Table. The most polluted communities6,748 Americans in 2 communities were served tap water contaminated with Asbestos above health based limits between 1998 and 2003 Ranked by highest average Asbestos level Health based limits for Asbestos
| Health Limit | Limit Value | Limit Description |
|---|
| Maximum Contaminant Limit (MCL) | 7 MFL | The enforceable standard which defines the highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as close to health-based limits (Maximum Contaminant Level Goals, or MCLGs) as feasible using the best available analytical and treatment technologies and taking cost into consideration. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | | Maximum Contaminant Limit Goal (MCLG) | 7 MFL | A non-enforceable health goal that is set at a level at which no known or anticipated adverse effect on the health of persons occurs and which allows an adequate margin of safety. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | | One in ten thousand (10-4) Cancer Risk | 700 MFL | The concentration of a chemical in drinking water corresponding to an excess estimated lifetime cancer risk of 1 in 10,000. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | | California Public Health Goals | 7 MFL | Defined by the State of California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) as the level of contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. For acutely toxic substances, levels are set at which scientific evidence indicates that no known or anticipated adverse effects on health will occur, plus an adequate margin-of safety. PHGs for carcinogens or other substances which can cause chronic disease shall be based solely on health effects without regard to cost impacts and shall be set at levels which OEHHA has determined do not pose any significant risk to health. | | EPA Human Health Water Quality Criteria | 7 MFL | Water quality criteria set by the US EPA provide guidance for states and tribes authorized to establish water quality standards under the Clean Water Act (CWA) to protect human health. These are non-enforceable standards based upon exposure by both drinking water and the contribution of water contamination to other consumed foods. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | Testing Summary for Asbestos Water suppliers report an average of 0.3 Asbestos tests per year. 37,218 water suppliers failed to report
any Asbestos tests at all. | Are tests routinely required for Asbestos by federal law? | Yes | | Water suppliers reporting tests for Asbestos (1998-2003): | 2,533 of 39,751 | | Average testing rate for water supplier reporting tests (1998-2003): | 0.3 per year |
|
Asbestos Violations Table. 0.1 percent of all water suppliers violated safe drinking water standards for Asbestos between 1998 and 2003 | Violation Type | Violations | Systems |
|---|
| Any Violation (1998-2003) | 78 | 60 | | (0.1% of all suppliers) | | Testing violations (1998-2003) | 66 | 53 | | (< 0.1% of all suppliers) | | Violations of tap water pollution standards (1998-2003) | 12 | 8 | | (< 0.1% of all suppliers) |
|