National Drinking Water Database
National Drinking Water Database - Chemical Contaminants
Dicamba
Status: Unregulated - EPA has not established a maximum legal limit in tapwater for this contaminant.
Dicamba is an herbicide applied in agriculture, rangeland, pasture and industry; it is used for corn, wheat and other crops. [read more]
Detected |
Found above health guidelines |
Found above legal limit |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| States | 11 |
- |
- |
| Water utilities | 34 |
- |
- |
| People Served | 892,935 |
- |
- |
Health Concerns for Dicamba:
- Endocrine disruption
- Cancer
- Occupational hazards
- Organ system toxicity (non-reproductive)
- Developmental/reproductive toxicity
- Irritation (skin, eyes, or lungs)
- Ecotoxicology
- Multiple, additive exposure sources
Dicamba Exposure by State
Water utilities in 11 states have reported detecting Dicamba in treated tap water since 2004, according to EWG's analysis of water quality data supplied by state water agencies.
| State | Water Suppliers with Dicamba contamination | |
|---|---|---|
| Systems | Population | |
| Nebraska | 5 | 271,422 |
| New Jersey | 1 | 217,230 |
| Delaware | 1 | 201,000 |
| Illinois | 5 | 84,156 |
| Maryland | 11 | 70,407 |
| California | 2 | 17,110 |
| Wisconsin | 3 | 15,025 |
| Massachusetts | 3 | 11,150 |
| North Carolina | 1 | 2,500 |
| Maine | 1 | 2,135 |
| New York | 1 | 800 |
| Total | 34 | 892,935 |
The Most Polluted Communities
34 water utilities reported detecting Dicamba in tap water since 2004, according to EWG's analysis of water quality data supplied by state water agencies
Ranked by highest average Dicamba level
| Rank | System | Population Served | Positive test results of total reported tests | Average Level (Range) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City of North Bend North Bend, NE | 1,297 | 1 of 2 | 4.75 ppb (0 to 9.5 ppb) |
| 2 | Mci Shirley Prerelease Center Shirley, MA | 3,500 | 2 of 5 | 3.86 ppb (0 to 18.5 ppb) |
| 3 | Cedar-Knox Rwd Hartington, NE | 2,200 | 1 of 2 | 2.35 ppb (0 to 4.7 ppb) |
| 4 | Country Acres Mhp (La Salle County) Des Plaines, IL | 295 | 1 of 2 | 1.65 ppb (0 to 3.3 ppb) |
| 5 | Shirley Water District Shirley, MA | 3,850 | 1 of 2 | 1.11 ppb (0 to 2.23 ppb) |
| 6 | Rutland Water Department Rutland, MA | 3,800 | 1 of 4 | 0.78 ppb (0 to 3.1 ppb) |
| 7 | Decatur Decatur, IL | 81,860 | 1 of 1 | 0.71 ppb (0.71 ppb) |
| 8 | City of Lincoln Lincoln, NE | 203,000 | 1 of 5 | 0.6 ppb (0 to 3 ppb) |
| 9 | City of Grand Island Grand Island, NE | 40,036 | 1 of 6 | 0.27 ppb (0 to 1.6 ppb) |
| 10 | Town of White Lake White Lake, NC | 2,500 | 1 of 5 | 0.26 ppb (0 to 1.3 ppb) |
Health Based Limits for Dicamba
| Standard | Description | Level |
|---|---|---|
| Health-Based Screening Level | A benchmark concentration of contaminants in water that may be of potential concern for human health, if exceeded. For noncarcinogens, the HBSL represents the contaminant concentration in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse effects over a lifetime of exposure. For carcinogens, the HBSL range represents the contaminant concentration in drinking water that corresponds to an excess estimated lifetime cancer risk of 1 chance in 1 million to 1 chance in 10 thousand. Source: U.S. Geological Survey. | 3000 ppb |
| Lifetime health-based limit, non-cancer risk | Concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse, noncarcinogenic health effects for a lifetime of exposure. The Lifetime health-based limit (or Health Advisory, HA) is based on exposure for a a 70-kg adult consuming 2 liters of water per day. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | 4000 ppb |
| Drinking Water Equivalent Level | A lifetime exposure concentration protective of adverse, noncarcinogenic health effects, that assumes all of the exposure to a contaminant is from drinking water. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | 18000 ppb |
Testing Summary for Dicamba
| Are tests routinely required for Dicamba by federal law? | No |
| Water suppliers reporting tests for Dicamba (2004-2009): | 12,692 of 47,576 |
| Average testing rate for water supplier reporting tests (2004-2009): | 0.4 per year |
Endocrine disruption
| Type of concern: | Reference: |
| Possible human disruptor | FDA Food Additive Status |
Cancer
| Type of concern: | Reference: |
| Cancer - moderate evidence - immune system | CHE Toxicant and Disease Database |
| One or more in vitro tests on mammalian cells show positive mutation results | RTECS®- Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 1990 |
| One or more in vitro tests on mammalian cells show positive mutation results | RTECS®- Tsitologiya i Genetika 1982 |
| One or more in vitro tests on mammalian cells show positive mutation results | RTECS®- Mutation Research 2007 |
| One or more in vitro tests non-mammalian cells show positive mutation results | RTECS®- National Technical Information Service 3226 |
Occupational hazards
| Type of concern: | Reference: |
| Allowed workplace exposures restricted to low doses | European Union - Classification & Labelling |
Organ system toxicity (non-reproductive)
| Type of concern: | Reference: |
| Limited evidence of eye toxicity | European Union - Classification & Labelling |
| Classified as toxic or harmful | European Union - Classification & Labelling |
| One or more animal studies show classified as toxic effects at moderate doses (low dose studies may be unavailable for this ingredient) | EPA Toxic Release Inventory PBTs |
Developmental/reproductive toxicity
| Type of concern: | Reference: |
| Limited evidence of developmental toxicity | US EPA, 1788 |
| Limited evidence of reproductive toxicity | Frazier , L, 1998 |
Irritation (skin, eyes, or lungs)
| Type of concern: | Reference: |
| Classified as irritant | European Union - Classification & Labelling |
Ecotoxicology
| Type of concern: | Reference: |
| Wildlife and environmental toxicity | European Union - Classification & Labelling |
Multiple, additive exposure sources
| Type of concern: | Reference: |
| Designated as safe for general or specific, limited use in food | FDA Food Additive Status |
Government, industry, academic studies and classifications
| government/industry list/academic study | appears on list as | classification(s) |
| European Union - Classification & Labelling | DICAMBA | •Harmful •Harmful if swallowed •Irritant (eyes, skin, or lungs) •Risk of serious damage to eyes •Harmful to aquatic organisms |
| FDA Food Additive Status | DICAMBA | • Food additive: herbicide • Food additive: food additive for which a petition has been filed and a regulation issued • Tolerances for Residues - 40 Code of Federal Regulations 180.227 |
| EPA Toxic Release Inventory PBTs | 3,6-DICHLORO-2-METHYOXYBENZOIC ACID | •Toxic, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Toxics Release Inventory programs |
| US EPA, 1788 | DICAMBA | •Developmental toxicity hazards: suspected |
| Frazier , L, 1998 | DICAMBA | •Reproductive toxicity hazards: suspected |
| RTECS®- Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 1990 | DICAMBA | • mutagenic - Positive mutation assay: DNA Damage (rat ipr) • mutagenic - Positive mutation assay: Unscheduled DNA Synthesis (rat lym) |
| RTECS®- Mutation Research 2007 | DICAMBA | • mutagenic - Positive mutation assay: DNA Damage (hamster ovr) • mutagenic - Positive mutation assay: Sister Chromatid Exchange (hamster ovr) |
| RTECS®- National Technical Information Service 3226 | DICAMBA | • mutagenic - Positive mutation assay: DNA repair (Escherichia coli ) |
| RTECS®- Tsitologiya i Genetika 1982 | DICAMBA | • mutagenic - Positive mutation assay: Cytogenetic Analysis (mouse unr) |
references
| government/industry list/academic study | reference |
| European Union - Classification & Labelling | CPS&Q (Consumer Products Safety & Quality) formely known as ECB (European Chemicals Bureau). 2008. Classification and Labelling: Chemicals: Annex VI of Directive 67/548/EEC through the 31st ATP. |
| FDA Food Additive Status | FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) 2006. Food Additive Status List. Downloaded from http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/%7Edms/opa-appa.html, Oct 16, 2006. |
| EPA Toxic Release Inventory PBTs | EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1999. Toxics Release Inventory Program. PBT Chemical Rule. |
| Scorecard.org Toxicity Information | US EPA. Addition of Certain Chemicals; Toxic Chemical Release Reporting; Community Right to Know. Proposed and Final Rules. 59 Federal Register 1788 (Jan 12, 1994); 59 Federal Register 61432 (November 30, 1994). Summarized in Hazard Information on Toxic Chemicals Added to EPCRA Section 313 Under Chemical Expansion. http://www.epa.gov/tri/chemical/hazard_cx.htm |
| Scorecard.org Toxicity Information | Frazier , L. and M. L. Hage (eds.). Reproductive Hazards of the Workplace, Wiley Europe, 1998. Table 10 (Partial List of Reproductive Toxicants) available at http://www.pharmacy.ohio-state.edu/homepage/safety/chemhygiene_table_repro.pdf. |
| RTECS®- Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 1990 | RTECS®- Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis. (Alan R. Liss, Inc., 41 E. 11th St., New York, NY 10003) V.10- 15,131,1990 |
| RTECS®- Mutation Research 2007 | RTECS®- Mutation Research. (Elsevier Science Pub. B.V., POB 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands) V.1- 634,60,2007 |
| RTECS®- National Technical Information Service 3226 | RTECS®- National Technical Information Service. (Springfield, VA 22161) Formerly U.S. Clearinghouse for Scientific & Technical Information. PB80-133226 |
| RTECS®- Tsitologiya i Genetika 1982 | RTECS®- Tsitologiya i Genetika. Cytology and Genetics. For English translation, see CYGEDX. (V/O Mezhdunarodnaya Kniga, 113095 Moscow, USSR) V.1- 16(1),45,1982 |
"RTECS®" is a United States trademark owned and licensed under authority of the U.S. Government, by and through MDL Information Systems, Inc.
