National Drinking Water Database
National Drinking Water Database - Chemical Contaminants
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Status: Regulated - EPA has established a maximum legal limit in tapwater for this contaminant.
2,4,5-TP (Silvex) is an herbicide banned in 1985; it was formerly used in homes and on recreation areas, industrial sites, lumber yards, vacant lots, lawns and turf, and crops including rice. [read more]
Detected |
Found above health guidelines |
Found above legal limit |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| States | 10 |
1 |
- |
| Water utilities | 20 |
1 |
- |
| People Served | 3,218,735 |
50 |
- |
Health Concerns for 2,4,5-TP (Silvex):
- Occupational hazards
- Irritation (skin, eyes, or lungs)
- Organ system toxicity (non-reproductive)
- Cancer
- Ecotoxicology
2,4,5-TP (Silvex) Exposure by State
Water utilities in 10 states have reported detecting 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) in treated tap water since 2004, according to EWG's analysis of water quality data supplied by state water agencies.
| State | Water Suppliers with 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) contamination | Water suppliers reporting 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) above health-based limits | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Systems | Population | Systems | Population | |
| Florida | 8 | 2,629,910 | 1 | 50 |
| Indiana | 1 | 250,000 | 0 | 0 |
| Delaware | 1 | 201,000 | 0 | 0 |
| Connecticut | 3 | 39,897 | 0 | 0 |
| Virginia | 1 | 37,000 | 0 | 0 |
| Maryland | 2 | 32,194 | 0 | 0 |
| Wisconsin | 1 | 14,000 | 0 | 0 |
| South Dakota | 1 | 13,703 | 0 | 0 |
| New York | 1 | 800 | 0 | 0 |
| North Carolina | 1 | 231 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 3,218,735 | 1 | 50 |
The Most Polluted Communities
20 water utilities reported detecting 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) in tap water since 2004, according to EWG's analysis of water quality data supplied by state water agencies
Ranked by highest average 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) level
| Rank | System | Population Served | Positive test results of total reported tests | Average Level (Range) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Glen St. Mary Water System Glen St. Mary, FL | 50 | 1 of 10 | 2.8 ppb (0 to 28 ppb) |
| 2 | Yankton Yankton, SD | 13,703 | 1 of 2 | 1.05 ppb (0 to 2.1 ppb) |
| 3 | City of Manassas Manassas, VA | 37,000 | 1 of 2 | 0.7 ppb (0 to 1.4 ppb) |
| 4 | Florida City Florida City, FL | 9,445 | 1 of 3 | 0.33 ppb (0 to 1 ppb) |
| 5 | CTWC - Naugatuck Reg-Collinsville Sys Naugatuck, CT | 6,324 | 1 of 5 | 0.09 ppb (0 to 0.44 ppb) |
| 6 | Paradise Point S/D Gastonia, NC | 231 | 1 of 7 | 0.08 ppb (0 to 0.56 ppb) |
| 7 | Whitewater Waterworks Whitewater, WI | 14,000 | 1 of 1 | 0.05 ppb (0.05 ppb) |
| 8 | Town of Federalsburg Federalsburg, MD | 2,450 | 1 of 1 | 0.03 ppb (0.03 ppb) |
| 9 | Putnam Water Pollution Control Authority Putnam, CT | 7,300 | 1 of 11 | 0.02 ppb (0 to 0.22 ppb) |
| 10 | New London Dept. of Public Utilities New London, CT | 26,273 | 1 of 6 | 0.02 ppb (0 to 0.12 ppb) |
Health Based Limits for 2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
| Standard | Description | Level |
|---|---|---|
| EPA Human Health Water Quality Criteria | Water quality criteria set by the US EPA provide guidance for states and tribes authorized to establish water quality standards under the Clean Water Act (CWA) to protect human health. These are non-enforceable standards based upon exposure by both drinking water and the contribution of water contamination to other consumed foods. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | 10 ppb |
| California Public Health Goals | Defined by the State of California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) as the level of contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. For acutely toxic substances, levels are set at which scientific evidence indicates that no known or anticipated adverse effects on health will occur, plus an adequate margin-of safety. PHGs for carcinogens or other substances which can cause chronic disease shall be based solely on health effects without regard to cost impacts and shall be set at levels which OEHHA has determined do not pose any significant risk to health. | 25 ppb |
| Maximum Contaminant Limit (MCL) | The enforceable standard which defines the highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as close to health-based limits (Maximum Contaminant Level Goals, or MCLGs) as feasible using the best available analytical and treatment technologies and taking cost into consideration. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | 50 ppb |
| Maximum Contaminant Limit Goal (MCLG) | A non-enforceable health goal that is set at a level at which no known or anticipated adverse effect on the health of persons occurs and which allows an adequate margin of safety. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | 50 ppb |
| Lifetime health-based limit, non-cancer risk | Concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse, noncarcinogenic health effects for a lifetime of exposure. The Lifetime health-based limit (or Health Advisory, HA) is based on exposure for a a 70-kg adult consuming 2 liters of water per day. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | 50 ppb |
| Children's health-based limit for 1-day exposure | Concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse, noncarcinogenic health effects for up to one day of exposure. The One-Day health-based limit (or Health Advisory, HA) is typically set to protect a 10-kg child consuming 1 liter of water per day. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | 200 ppb |
| Children's health-based limit for 10-day exposure | Concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse, noncarcinogenic effects for up to ten days of exposure. The Ten-Day health-based limit (or Health Advisory, HA) is typically set to protect a 10-kg child consuming 1 liter of water per day. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | 200 ppb |
| Drinking Water Equivalent Level | A lifetime exposure concentration protective of adverse, noncarcinogenic health effects, that assumes all of the exposure to a contaminant is from drinking water. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | 300 ppb |
Testing Summary for 2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
| Are tests routinely required for 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) by federal law? | Yes |
| Water suppliers reporting tests for 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) (2004-2009): | 19,454 of 47,576 |
| Average testing rate for water supplier reporting tests (2004-2009): | 0.4 per year |
Violation Summary for 2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency includes the following violations of federal standards for 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) since 2004
| Maximum Contaminant Level Exceedance Violations | 0 |
| Monitoring Violations | 1,676 |
| Reporting Violations | 0 |
Occupational hazards
| Type of concern: | Reference: |
| Allowed workplace exposures restricted to low doses | European Union - Classification & Labelling |
Irritation (skin, eyes, or lungs)
| Type of concern: | Reference: |
| Classified as irritant | European Union - Classification & Labelling |
Organ system toxicity (non-reproductive)
| Type of concern: | Reference: |
| Classified as toxic or harmful | European Union - Classification & Labelling |
Cancer
| Type of concern: | Reference: |
| Cancer - not classifiable/not likely to be human carcinogen | EPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) |
Ecotoxicology
| Type of concern: | Reference: |
| Wildlife and environmental toxicity | European Union - Classification & Labelling |
Government, industry, academic studies and classifications
| government/industry list/academic study | appears on list as | classification(s) |
| European Union - Classification & Labelling | FENOPROP | •Harmful •Harmful if swallowed •Irritant (eyes, skin, or lungs) •Irritating to skin •Dangerous for the environment •Very toxic to aquatic organisms |
| EPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) | 2(2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOXY) PROPIONIC ACID (2,4,5-TP) | •Group D: Not classifiable as to human carcinogenicity (EPA classification) |
references
| government/industry list/academic study | reference |
| European Union - Classification & Labelling | CPS&Q (Consumer Products Safety & Quality) formely known as ECB (European Chemicals Bureau). 2008. Classification and Labelling: Chemicals: Annex VI of Directive 67/548/EEC through the 31st ATP. |
| EPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) | EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2008. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). Evidence for human carcinogenicity based on 1986-2005 guidelines. |
"RTECS®" is a United States trademark owned and licensed under authority of the U.S. Government, by and through MDL Information Systems, Inc.
