National Drinking Water Database
National Drinking Water Database - Chemical Contaminants
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Status: Unregulated - EPA has not established a maximum legal limit in tapwater for this contaminant.
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane is a synthetic chemical used for metal degreasing and in the production of paint, cement, paint removers and moth-proofing products.
Detected |
Found above health guidelines |
Found above legal limit |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| States | 6 |
4 |
- |
| Water utilities | 10 |
8 |
- |
| People Served | 513,118 |
509,379 |
- |
Health Concerns for 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane:
- Cancer
- Organ system toxicity (non-reproductive)
- Occupational hazards
- Developmental/reproductive toxicity
- Ecotoxicology
- Persistence and bioaccumulation
- Neurotoxicity
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Exposure by State
Water utilities in 6 states have reported detecting 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane in treated tap water since 2004, according to EWG's analysis of water quality data supplied by state water agencies.
| State | Water Suppliers with 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane contamination | Water suppliers reporting 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane above health-based limits | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Systems | Population | Systems | Population | |
| Washington | 1 | 305,000 | 1 | 305,000 |
| Delaware | 1 | 201,000 | 1 | 201,000 |
| New York | 3 | 2,705 | 3 | 2,705 |
| North Carolina | 3 | 674 | 3 | 674 |
| Missouri | 1 | 2,779 | 0 | 0 |
| New Jersey | 1 | 960 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 513,118 | 8 | 509,379 |
The Most Polluted Communities
10 water utilities reported detecting 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane in tap water since 2004, according to EWG's analysis of water quality data supplied by state water agencies
Ranked by highest average 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane level
| Rank | System | Population Served | Positive test results of total reported tests | Average Level (Range) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wild Oaks Water Company Rockport, NY | 805 | 1 of 3 | 55.67 ppb (0 to 167 ppb) |
| 2 | Bedford Hills/Taconic Corr. Facilities Bedford Hills, NY | 1,100 | 1 of 1 | 0.5 ppb (0.5 ppb) |
| 3 | Mcwa, Genesee West Rochester, NY | 800 | 2 of 3 | 0.13 ppb (0 to 0.26 ppb) |
| 4 | Ham`s Mhp NO 2 Stanley, NC | 99 | 1 of 15 | 0.07 ppb (0 to 1.1 ppb) |
| 5 | Hillcrest/Mcbride Heights S/D Mt Airy, NC | 490 | 1 of 9 | 0.06 ppb (0 to 0.5 ppb) |
| 6 | Ridgeview S/D Garner, NC | 85 | 1 of 15 | 0.04 ppb (0 to 0.6 ppb) |
| 7 | Artesian Water Company Newark, DE | 201,000 | 1 of 134 | 0.01 ppb (0 to 1.63 ppb) |
| 8 | Harding Woods Mhp Pittsgrove Twp, NJ | 960 | 1 of 10 | < 0.01 ppb (0 to 0.08 ppb) |
| 9 | City of Tacoma Water Division Tacoma, WA | 305,000 | 1 of 34 | < 0.01 ppb (0 to 0.2 ppb) |
| 10 | Camdenton Camdenton, MO | 2,779 | 1 of 22 | < 0.01 ppb (< .01 to 7.0E-5 ppb) |
Health Based Limits for 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
| Standard | Description | Level |
|---|---|---|
| California Public Health Goals | Defined by the State of California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) as the level of contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. For acutely toxic substances, levels are set at which scientific evidence indicates that no known or anticipated adverse effects on health will occur, plus an adequate margin-of safety. PHGs for carcinogens or other substances which can cause chronic disease shall be based solely on health effects without regard to cost impacts and shall be set at levels which OEHHA has determined do not pose any significant risk to health. | 0.1 ppb |
| EPA Human Health Water Quality Criteria | Water quality criteria set by the US EPA provide guidance for states and tribes authorized to establish water quality standards under the Clean Water Act (CWA) to protect human health. These are non-enforceable standards based upon exposure by both drinking water and the contribution of water contamination to other consumed foods. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | 0.17 ppb |
| One in one million (10-6) Cancer Risk | The concentration of a chemical in drinking water corresponding to an excess estimated lifetime cancer risk of 1 in 1,000,000. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | 0.2 ppb |
| Lifetime health-based limit, non-cancer risk | Concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse, noncarcinogenic health effects for a lifetime of exposure. The Lifetime health-based limit (or Health Advisory, HA) is based on exposure for a a 70-kg adult consuming 2 liters of water per day. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | 0.3 ppb |
| Health-Based Screening Level | A benchmark concentration of contaminants in water that may be of potential concern for human health, if exceeded. For noncarcinogens, the HBSL represents the contaminant concentration in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse effects over a lifetime of exposure. For carcinogens, the HBSL range represents the contaminant concentration in drinking water that corresponds to an excess estimated lifetime cancer risk of 1 chance in 1 million to 1 chance in 10 thousand. Source: U.S. Geological Survey. | 0.3 ppb |
| Drinking Water Equivalent Level | A lifetime exposure concentration protective of adverse, noncarcinogenic health effects, that assumes all of the exposure to a contaminant is from drinking water. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | 2 ppb |
| One in ten thousand (10-4) Cancer Risk | The concentration of a chemical in drinking water corresponding to an excess estimated lifetime cancer risk of 1 in 10,000. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | 20 ppb |
| Children's health-based limit for 1-day exposure | Concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse, noncarcinogenic health effects for up to one day of exposure. The One-Day health-based limit (or Health Advisory, HA) is typically set to protect a 10-kg child consuming 1 liter of water per day. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | 40 ppb |
| Children's health-based limit for 10-day exposure | Concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse, noncarcinogenic effects for up to ten days of exposure. The Ten-Day health-based limit (or Health Advisory, HA) is typically set to protect a 10-kg child consuming 1 liter of water per day. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | 40 ppb |
Testing Summary for 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
| Are tests routinely required for 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane by federal law? | No |
| Water suppliers reporting tests for 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane (2004-2009): | 21,610 of 47,576 |
| Average testing rate for water supplier reporting tests (2004-2009): | 0.6 per year |
Cancer
| Type of concern: | Reference: |
| Possible human carcinogen | California EPA Proposition 65 |
| Cancer - strong evidence | Proposition 65 List of Carcinogens |
| Limited evidence of carcinogenicity | Amer Conf of Gov't Industrial Hygienists - Carcinogens |
| Limited evidence of carcinogenicity | EPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) |
| Limited evidence of carcinogenicity | NIOSH Occupational Carcinogens |
| One or more in vitro tests on mammalian cells show positive mutation results | RTECS®- Carcinogenesis (London) 1992 |
| One or more in vitro tests on mammalian cells show positive mutation results | RTECS®- Mutation Research 1995 |
| One or more in vitro tests on mammalian cells show positive mutation results | RTECS®- Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 1987 |
| One or more in vitro tests non-mammalian cells show positive mutation results | RTECS®- Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry 1987 |
| One or more in vitro tests non-mammalian cells show positive mutation results | RTECS®- Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 1992 |
| One or more in vitro tests non-mammalian cells show positive mutation results | RTECS®- Cancer Research 1974 |
| One or more in vitro tests non-mammalian cells show positive mutation results | RTECS®- Mutation Research 1988 |
| Cancer - not classifiable/not likely to be human carcinogen | Int'l Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) - Carcinogens |
Organ system toxicity (non-reproductive)
| Type of concern: | Reference: |
| Known human respiratory toxicant | EPA Hazardous Air Pollutants |
| Classified as very toxic or harmful | European Union - Classification & Labelling |
| Limited evidence of gastrointestinal or liver toxicity | National Library of Medicine HazMap |
| Limited evidence of respiratory toxicity | Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 2004 |
| Limited evidence of gastrointestinal or liver toxicity | Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 2004 |
| One or more animal studies show classified as toxic effects at moderate doses (low dose studies may be unavailable for this ingredient) | EPA Toxic Release Inventory PBTs |
| Classified as not expected to be potentially toxic or harmful | Environment Canada Domestic Substance List |
| Classified as a low human health priority | Environment Canada Domestic Substance List |
Occupational hazards
| Type of concern: | Reference: |
| Allowed workplace exposures restricted to very low doses | European Union - Classification & Labelling |
| Allowed workplace exposures restricted to moderate doses | RTECS®- TLV/BEI,2007 |
| Allowed workplace exposures restricted to high doses | RTECS®- MSHA STANDARD-air: 3,249,1971 |
| Allowed workplace exposures restricted to high doses | RTECS®- OSHA PEL (Gen Indu): 29,1910 1994 |
| Allowed workplace exposures restricted to high doses | RTECS®- OSHA PEL (Construc): 29,1926 1994 |
| Allowed workplace exposures restricted to high doses | RTECS®- OSHA PEL (Shipyard): 29,1915 1993 |
| Allowed workplace exposures restricted to high doses | RTECS®- OSHA PEL (Fed Cont): 41,50-204 1994 |
Developmental/reproductive toxicity
| Type of concern: | Reference: |
| Limited evidence of developmental toxicity | US EPA, 9204 |
Ecotoxicology
| Type of concern: | Reference: |
| Wildlife and environmental toxicity | European Union - Classification & Labelling |
| Wildlife and environmental toxicity | EPA Clean Water Act - Priority Pollutants |
| Not suspected to be an environmental toxin | Environment Canada Domestic Substance List |
Persistence and bioaccumulation
| Type of concern: | Reference: |
| Not suspected to be bioaccumulative | Environment Canada Domestic Substance List |
Neurotoxicity
| Type of concern: | Reference: |
| nervous system - weight of evidence unknown/unassessed/unreview: published lit review or major tox study | National Library of Medicine HazMap |
Government, industry, academic studies and classifications
| government/industry list/academic study | appears on list as | classification(s) |
| European Union - Classification & Labelling | 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE | •Very toxic •Very toxic by inhalation and in contact with skin •Dangerous for the environment •Toxic to aquatic organisms |
| Amer Conf of Gov't Industrial Hygienists - Carcinogens | 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE | •Confirmed animal carcinogen with unknown relevance to humans (ACGIH classification A3) |
| EPA Clean Water Act - Priority Pollutants | 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE | •Priority water pollutant under the Clean Water Act |
| Environment Canada Domestic Substance List | ETHANE, 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLORO- | •This chemical was deemed a low human health priority and was NOT flagged by CEPA for further attention. The chemical was flagged for suspected persistence. |
| EPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) | 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE | •Group C: Possible human carcinogen (EPA classification) |
| EPA Hazardous Air Pollutants | 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE | •Hazardous air pollutant under Clean Air Act |
| National Library of Medicine HazMap | 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE | •Skin Designation (ACGIH) - Danger of cutaneous absorption (ACGIH): Yes; •Hepatotoxin: Hepatotoxin, Primary; •Neurotoxin: CNS Solvent Syndrome; •PEL (OSHA) - Permissible exposure limit (OSHA): 5 ppm; •LC50 - Lethal concentration in 50% of animals tested: 1029 ppm; •TLV (ACGIH) - Threshold limit value (ACGIH): 1 ppm; •Flammability (NFPA) - NFPA flammability code: 0 = will not burn; 1 = must be preheated; 2 = high ambient temp required; 3 = may ignite at ambient temp; 4 = burn readily: 0: will not burn; •IDLH (NIOSH) - Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health: 100 ppm; •Lacrimator - A substance that irritates the eyes and induces the flow of tears: Yes; •Odor Threshold High - The lowest concentration at which a substance can be detected or recognized using the sense of smell: 7.9 ppm; •Odor Threshold Low - The lowest concentration at which a substance can be detected or recognized using the sense of smell: 0.23 ppm; •MAK - Maximum Allowable Concentration (Federal Republic of Germany): 1 ppm; |
| Int'l Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) - Carcinogens | 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE | •IARC Group 3 (no cancer link) |
| NIOSH Occupational Carcinogens | 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE | •Potential occupational carcinogen according to NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) |
| EPA Toxic Release Inventory PBTs | 1,1,2,2TETRACHLOROETHANE | •Toxic, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Toxics Release Inventory programs |
| California EPA Proposition 65 | 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE | •Carcinogen: California Proposition 65 |
| Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 2004 | 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE | •Respiratory toxicity hazards: suspected |
| Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 2004 | 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE | •Gastrointestinal or liver toxicity hazards: suspected |
| US EPA, 9204 | 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE | •Developmental toxicity hazards: suspected |
| Proposition 65 List of Carcinogens | 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE | •Cancer hazards: recognized |
| RTECS®- TLV/BEI,2007 | 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE | • occupationally related - ACGIH TLV (human TWA) |
| RTECS®- Cancer Research 1974 | 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE | • mutagenic - Positive mutation assay: DNA repair (Escherichia coli ) |
| RTECS®- Carcinogenesis (London) 1992 | 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE | • mutagenic - Positive mutation assay: DNA Inhibition ( human hla) |
| RTECS®- Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 1987 | 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE | • mutagenic - Positive mutation assay: Sister Chromatid Exchange (hamster ovr) |
| RTECS®- Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 1992 | 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE | • mutagenic - Positive mutation assay: other mutation test systems (Escherichia coli ) |
| RTECS®- MSHA STANDARD-air: 3,249,1971 | 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE | • occupationally related - MSHA STANDARD-air (human TWA) |
| RTECS®- Mutation Research 1988 | 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE | • mutagenic - Positive mutation assay: Sex Chromosome Loss and Nondisjunction ( Aspergillis nidulans ) |
| RTECS®- Mutation Research 1995 | 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE | • mutagenic - Positive mutation assay: other mutation test systems (mouse orl) |
| RTECS®- OSHA PEL (Construc): 29,1926 1994 | 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE | • occupationally related - OSHA PEL (Construc) (human TWA) |
| RTECS®- OSHA PEL (Fed Cont): 41,50-204 1994 | 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE | • occupationally related - OSHA PEL (Fed Cont) (human TWA) |
| RTECS®- OSHA PEL (Gen Indu): 29,1910 1994 | 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE | • occupationally related - OSHA PEL (Gen Indu) (human TWA) |
| RTECS®- OSHA PEL (Shipyard): 29,1915 1993 | 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE | • occupationally related - OSHA PEL (Shipyard) (human TWA) |
| RTECS®- Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry 1987 | 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE | • mutagenic - Positive mutation assay: Mutation in Micro-organism (Salmonella typhimurium ) |
references
| government/industry list/academic study | reference |
| European Union - Classification & Labelling | CPS&Q (Consumer Products Safety & Quality) formely known as ECB (European Chemicals Bureau). 2008. Classification and Labelling: Chemicals: Annex VI of Directive 67/548/EEC through the 31st ATP. |
| Amer Conf of Gov't Industrial Hygienists - Carcinogens | ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists) 2008. ACGIH cancer classification system. www.acgih.org. |
| EPA Clean Water Act - Priority Pollutants | |
| Environment Canada Domestic Substance List | EC (Environment Canada). 2008. Domestic Substances List Categorization. Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) Environmental Registry. |
| EPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) | EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2008. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). Evidence for human carcinogenicity based on 1986-2005 guidelines. |
| EPA Hazardous Air Pollutants | EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2005. Office of Air. The 112(b)1 Hazardous Air Pollutants List (as modified). Last modified: 12 Dec 2005. |
| National Library of Medicine HazMap | NLM (National Library of Medicine). 2006. HazMap — Occupational Exposure to Hazardous Agents. |
| Int'l Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) - Carcinogens | IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). 2008. Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity to Humans, as evaluated in IARC Monographs Volumes 1-99 (a total of 935 agents, mixtures and exposures). |
| NIOSH Occupational Carcinogens | NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health). 2006. NIOSH Carcinogens List (Potential occupational carcinogens). http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npotocca.html. |
| EPA Toxic Release Inventory PBTs | EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1999. Toxics Release Inventory Program. PBT Chemical Rule. |
| California EPA Proposition 65 | California EPA (California Environmental Protection Agency). 9/2008. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986. Chemicals known to the State to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity. |
| Scorecard.org Toxicity Information | Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Minimal risk Levels for Hazardous Substances. January 2004. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/mrls.html, US EPA, Air Risk Information Support Center. Health Effects Notebook for Hazardous Air Pollutants. http://www.epa.gov/ttnatw01/hlthef/hapindex.html |
| Scorecard.org Toxicity Information | Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Minimal risk Levels for Hazardous Substances. January 2004. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/mrls.html, US EPA, Air Risk Information Support Center. Health Effects Notebook for Hazardous Air Pollutants. http://www.epa.gov/ttnatw01/hlthef/hapindex.html, A Relational Database of Hazardous Chemicals and Occupational Diseases. Browse Haz-Map by Adverse Effects http://hazmap.nlm.nih.gov/hazmapadv.html, LaDou, J. (ed.). Occupational Medicine. Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, CN. 1990., National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. See Environmental Defense's Suspect Hazard Identification documentation., Zimmerman, H.J. and J.H. Lewis. Chemical- and Toxin-Induced Hepatotoxicity. Gastroenterology Clinics of North America. 24(4): 1027-1045. 1995. (Table 3: Forms of environmental hepatic injury). |
| Scorecard.org Toxicity Information | US EPA. Roadmaps to Sources of Information on Chemicals Listed in the Emergency Planning Community and Community Right-to-Know Act (Also Known as SARA Title 3), Section 313 Toxic Release Inventory (for Microcomputers). (Report Number EPADFDK92040). 1991. Data file distributed in 2 diskettes by Office of Pollution, Prevention, and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. NOTE: Datasource no longer being maintained by EPA; not currently available online. |
| Scorecard.org Toxicity Information | Proposition 65 List of Carcinogens (July 2004) can be obtained from http://www.oehha.ca.gov/prop65/prop65_list/Newlist.html. |
| RTECS®- TLV/BEI,2007 | RTECS®- TLV/BEI,2007 |
| RTECS®- Cancer Research 1974 | RTECS®- Cancer Research. (Public Ledger Building, Suit 816, 6th & Chestnut Sts., Philadelphia, PA 19106) V.1- 34,2576,1974 |
| RTECS®- Carcinogenesis (London) 1992 | RTECS®- Carcinogenesis (London). (Oxford Univ. Press, Pinkhill House, Southfield Road, Eynsham, Oxford OX8 1JJ, UK) V.1- 13,2389,1992 |
| RTECS®- Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 1987 | RTECS®- Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis. (Alan R. Liss, Inc., 41 E. 11th St., New York, NY 10003) V.10- 10(Suppl 10),1,1987 |
| RTECS®- Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 1992 | RTECS®- Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis. (Alan R. Liss, Inc., 41 E. 11th St., New York, NY 10003) V.10- 19,98,1992 |
| RTECS®- MSHA STANDARD-air: 3,249,1971 | RTECS®- MSHA STANDARD-air: 3,249,1971 |
| RTECS®- Mutation Research 1988 | RTECS®- Mutation Research. (Elsevier Science Pub. B.V., POB 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands) V.1- 201,401,1988 |
| RTECS®- Mutation Research 1995 | RTECS®- Mutation Research. (Elsevier Science Pub. B.V., POB 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands) V.1- 343,157,1995 |
| RTECS®- OSHA PEL (Construc): 29,1926 1994 | RTECS®- OSHA PEL (Construc): 29,1926.55,1994 |
| RTECS®- OSHA PEL (Fed Cont): 41,50-204 1994 | RTECS®- OSHA PEL (Fed Cont): 41,50-204.50,1994 |
| RTECS®- OSHA PEL (Gen Indu): 29,1910 1994 | RTECS®- OSHA PEL (Gen Indu): 29,1910.1000,1994 |
| RTECS®- OSHA PEL (Shipyard): 29,1915 1993 | RTECS®- OSHA PEL (Shipyard): 29,1915.1000,1993 |
| RTECS®- Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry 1987 | RTECS®- Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry. (Gordon & Breach Science Pub. Inc., 1 Park Ave., New York, NY 10016) V.3(3/4)- 15,101,1987 |
"RTECS®" is a United States trademark owned and licensed under authority of the U.S. Government, by and through MDL Information Systems, Inc.
