 >| 1: America's asbestos epidemic  >| 2: 'Business as Usual' Bankruptcies  >| 3: Industry hid dangers for decades  >| 4: Millions were exposed were you?  >| 5: Asbestos is still not banned  >| 6: Tiny amounts are deadly 
 >| Executive Summary/Recommendations  >| Case Study: Federal Mogul  >| News Release 04 MAR 2004  >| Media Advisory 15 APR 2004  >| Statement 22 APR 2004  >| Update: 'Reforms' Disregard Epidemic 
 >| Related News Coverage  >| Related Weblinks  >| View our TV commercial  >| About this report  >| Dedication  >| Printer Friendly Version
Banner photograph © Bill Ravanesi About the photographer
|
|
"Asbestos Litigation Reform" Reconsidered
This website provides the most thorough review to date of the size and scope of the public health tragedy caused by asbestos in the United States. For the first time ever, it provides the public with new, localized information on asbestos-related diseases, deaths, and contamination sources. This original research is combined with a detailed list of products that expose the public to asbestos, a review of the failed 1989 attempt by EPA to ban asbestos, and an analysis of businesses with the most deaths from the signature asbestos cancer, mesothelioma. It also includes a discussion of asbestos diseases and how even short-term exposures can produce tragic outcomes.
The site takes the visitor behind closed doors at asbestos companies and their insurers via internal documents showing that company after company was willing to let workers suffer and die long after it was clear that asbestos was killing them. It is precisely the callous behavior evidenced by these documents that is at the core of all asbestos litigation. This fact, however, has been largely buried beneath claims that the litigation has "bankrupted" dozens of large U.S. companies.
The companies, it turns out, have a much different take on these bankruptcies, calling them "good news" (Halliburton), with "little impact on day-to-day operations" (Babcock and Wilcox).
As the Senate prepares to consider a sweeping, high-stakes bailout plan for asbestos companies and their insurers, the data and documents presented here should remind decision-makers that asbestos is a public health epidemic first and foremost.
When viewed through the prism of public health, two clear principles emerge that should guide the current debate:
- Any solution to the asbestos epidemic, be it litigation, a trust fund, or a combination of the two, must help everyone hurt by asbestos. The current proposal by Senators Frist and Hatch does not come close to this goal.
- All uses of asbestos must be banned immediately. This is the only way to put an end to the ongoing tragedy of asbestos illness and death.
Next page > >
|