Sign up to receive email updates, action alerts & health tips from EWG. [Privacy]

Broken
Stream Banks

Failure to maintain buffer zones worsens farm pollution

 
Read more below

Broken Stream Banks

Broken Stream Banks

Failure to maintain buffer zones worsens farm pollution
Friday, April 25, 2014

Water pollution from farmland is a major problem in southern Minnesota and wherever row crops dominate the landscape across the United States. Much of this pollution can be prevented by the conscientious use of riparian buffers – strips of grass, trees or other permanent vegetation maintained along the banks of rivers, streams, lakes and other waterways.

Sign up to stay in touch with EWG Midwest:

Satellite Map
See interactive map
Vegetation along public waterways is scattered in agricultural areas. Click on the map to see where insufficient buffers exist along perennial waterways.
Watershed Map
See interactive map
Perennial rivers and stream are far better protected in some watersheds than in others. Click on the map to see how well stream banks are protected in your area.
County Map
See interactive map
Counties vary widely in perennial stream bank protection. Click on the map to get detailed about your county.
Download PDF

Minnesota is a national leader in recognizing the importance of these buffers in combatting agricultural pollution. The state’s Shoreland Management Act confers legal protection of riparian buffers between most waterways and farmland. Like any other law, however, it must be enforced to be effective.

In 2013, the Environmental Working Group used high-resolution aerial photography to assess how well the law is working and to help county and state officials in their efforts ensure the required buffers are maintained between row crops and public waterways.

This report and the interactive maps show what EWG found.

Only 18% of perennial river and stream banks in agricultural areas are fully protected.

Grade Percent of Required Buffer Present Missing Buffer Acres Number of Waterways Percent of Waterways
A 100% 0 87 18%
A- 99-90% 59.4 57 12%
B 89-80% 235.3 81 17%
C 79-70% 626.1 93 19%
D 69-60% 673.7 66 14%
F 59-0% 690.5 101 21%
  Total 2,285 485 100%

While sizeable numbers of landowners maintain the required 50-foot riparian buffers, many others do not. Buffers are often far narrower than required and in some cases are completely missing. Overall, about 72 percent of the required buffering acres were in place in agricultural areas. But the overall average is misleading, because there are large differences among waterways. Only 18 percent (87 waterways) earned an A, meaning 100 percent of the required buffer was maintained along the waterway. In contrast, 21 percent (101 waterways) got a failing grade – less than 60 percent of the buffer acreage was in place.

Waterways that earn top grades are frequently next door to areas with failing grades.

Read more

A-Grade

The wide-strip of vegetation along this stream filters out pollutants and keeps the stream bank from collapsing. Runoff and broken banks are a major source of pollution in southern Minnesota waterways.
 
Read more

F-Grade

The vegetation along this stream is far narrower than 50-feet – in some places crops are planted right up the stream edge. Poorly protected stream banks like this undo the water quality gains produced by other landowners maintaining wide buffers.
 
Key Issues: