Connect with Us:
The Power of Information
Facebook Page Twitter @enviroblog Youtube Channel Our RSS Feeds
At EWG,
our team of scientists, engineers, policy experts, lawyers and computer programmers pores over government data, legal documents, scientific studies and our own laboratory tests to expose threats to your health and the environment, and to find solutions. Our research brings to light unsettling facts that you have a right to know.
Privacy Policy
(Updated Sept. 19, 2011)
Terms & Conditions
Reprint Permission Information
A crucial section of the Partial Consent Decree changed significantly just one week after EPA Administrator Whitman received a briefing from her staff on the Anniston PCB situation.
With this change, EPA usurped control from the State of Alabama, taking charge of the entire scope of PCB contamination in Anniston. Monsanto's defense attorneys used this Partial Consent Decree in an attempt to thwart a much tougher cleanup being ordered by the State Court.
1/22/02 Draft Partial Consent Decree definition of "site" on page 7 indicates that EPA will have control of all the areas "exclusive of the operating facility." The "operating facility" is governed by the state under RCRA permitting authority. With the Abernathy v. Monsanto trial just getting underway, Monsantos outside counsel writes EPA explaining that resolving the Anniston issue with EPA is a "top priority" for Solutia/Monsanto. [View document]
3/13/02 Partial Consent Decree definition of "site" on page 7 changes to include the operating facility under EPAs jurisdiction: "The Site includes, but is not limited to, the area covered by the RCRA permit." (Whitman briefing was March 6, 2002.) [Excerpt | Full document]