Sign up to receive email updates, action alerts, health tips, promotions to support our work and more from EWG. You can opt-out at any time. [Privacy]

 

U.S. Forest Service: Fracking Killed Trees

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Figure 9.-- Fluid application site 1, with non-treated forest in background, Fernow Experimental Forest. Photo taken May 17, 2009. Photo by U.S. Forest Service.

By Justine Chow, Natural Resources Summer Researcher Chemical-laden wastewater generated by a natural gas hydraulic fracturing operation killed more than half a stand of trees in a field study at the Monongahela National Forest, according to a new report from the U.S. Forest Service.

In a study of possible environmental impacts of gas drilling, published in this month's Journal of Environmental Quality, in June 2008, Forest Service researchers sprayed more than 80,000 gallons of fracking fluid on a half-acre area of hardwood trees in the Fernow Experimental Forest, a plot within the Monongahela Forest in West Virginia. They immediately observed "severe damage and mortality of ground vegetation" and, 10 days later, premature leaf drop. Two years after spraying, 56 percent of the large trees were dead.

The author, Mary Beth Adams, wrote that she and her fellow researchers were surprised by the dramatic die-off. "The risk to vegetation was assumed to be minimal," she wrote. " However, obvious and measurable damage to vegetation did occur from these fluids at three different locations."

According to Businessweek Magazine, some drilling industry personnel countered that the study did not accurately reflect normal disposal practices, which they said would have involved spreading that much wastewater over a much larger area.

Though dilution may have been able to save a few of the trees in the Forest Service experiment, as critics suggest, the study fully demonstrates the power of intensely saline wastewater associated with fracking. Fracking fluid may contain other destructive chemicals as well. With permits from the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, companies regularly and legally spray such fluids into forests and, in some cases, near residential areas.

The Forest Service study raises serious questions about the toxicity of fracking fluid. Natural gas drilling, including fracking, has boomed in recent years as more companies find natural gas extraction increasingly profitable.

Where is the research on the effects of this technology? It's troubling that this study is one of the very few published environmental papers on modern fracking processes and the only one so far that seemed to do a long-term, start-to-finish study at a drilling site. A recent May 2011 study by scientists at the Duke University Nicholas School of the Environment examined methane contamination in water wells near gas drilling operations. The Forest Service study was the first to deal with land contamination, and judging from the paper's findings, there is still a lot of ground (excuse the pun) to cover.

There is plenty of debate about natural gas markets and geological formations among research institutions but not enough empirical evidence concerning what happens to water and vegetation once drilling begins.

The U.S. Environmental Protection has only just started a larger long-term study that may address the potential environmental impacts described by the Forest Service paper.

While the U.S. needs to shift dependence away from foreign oil and dirty coal, let's make sure that we're not blindly fleeing down an unknown path. Without adequate research, the unforeseen obstacles along the way may render domestic natural gas as unsavory as its "dirtier" fossil fuel counterparts.

 

 

Key Issues: