Letter Supporting Farm Bill Proposed $4.951 Billion Conservation Increase

Download this letter as a PDF March 21, 2008
The Honorable Harry M. Reid Majority Leader The Honorable Mitch McConnell Minority Leader The Honorable Tom Harkin Chairman Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry The Honorable Saxby Chambliss Ranking Member Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry The Honorable Max Baucus Chairman Committee on Finance The Honorable Chuck Grassley Ranking Member Committee on Finance United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi Speaker The Honorable John Boehner Minority Leader The Honorable Collin Peterson Chairman Committee on Agriculture The Honorable Bob Goodlatte Ranking Member Committee on Agriculture The Honorable Charles Rangel Chairman Committee on Ways and Means The Honorable Jim McCrery Ranking Member Committee on Ways and Means United States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515
Dear Leader Reid, Madame Speaker, Chairmen and Ranking Members: The undersigned organizations respectfully and urgently request your strong support of the March 18, 2008, Farm Bill “Framework’s” $4.951 billion increase in new funds above baseline for the Bill’s voluntary, incentives-based conservation programs. While substantially more is truly needed to address the country’s conservation needs, this level of investment is essential. Any less risks irreparable damage to our agricultural lands and other natural resources. The ethanol boom, propelled in large measure by energy bill mandates Congress enacted in 2005 and dramatically expanded last year, is one of many factors putting enormous pressure on America’s land, water and wildlife resources. As a consequence, it is our expert judgment that a generation of conservation accomplishments could be severely diminished and, in some areas, may be erased altogether. The consequences for water quality, wildlife, wetlands, soil erosion control, flood prevention and management, and other vital natural systems and functions, could be profound, underscoring the need for substantial new funding of conservation programs. Much of the conservation legacy now in jeopardy was made possible by American taxpayers, who invested billions of dollars through Farm Bill conservation programs that our organizations worked with Congress to invent, propose, and, over decades of effort, persuade Congress to enact and fund. We are enormously proud that Farm Bill conservation programs have forged literally thousands of partnerships nationwide between conservation and agriculture interests. To a large degree, these programs are the only available tools to cope with the conservation pressures our organizations are observing around the country. In fact, the programs are so popular with farmers and ranchers that thousands of applicants are turned away every year for lack of funds. Over the 5 year term of the 2002 Farm Bill, $13.5 billion in requests from more than 487,000 farmers and ranchers went unfunded. A major reason for this funding gap is that Congress routinely cuts funding for the conservation programs. For the current fiscal year, Congress eliminated nearly $1 billion in mandatory conservation funding and, since passage of the 2002 Farm Bill, net cuts to mandatory conservation programs have totaled almost $4.5 billion. Thus we urge your support of the Framework’s conservation funding level. A minimum increase of $5 billion in new funds over baseline spending for conservation is needed to replace funding that has been slashed in recent years, and to cope with the conservation crisis that is looming in farm country. Any funds “saved” as a result of changes to conservation programs must be retained and reinvested in the Conservation Title. According to the Congressional Budget Office, crop subsidy payments will decline by billions due to high prices over the course of the next farm bill. Net farm income, at a record level this year, is projected to remain robust. The farm economy’s unprecedented prosperity makes this an ideal time for tens of thousands of farmers to invest in overdue conservation measures through federal programs that share the costs. We look forward to working with you to ensure that the Framework’s conservation level is the minimum included in the final Farm Bill. We welcome the opportunity to discuss this urgent matter with you further during this pivotal period in the Farm Bill debate. Respectfully, American Rivers American Society of Agronomy Center for Native Ecosystems Chesapeake Bay Commission Coevolution Institute Crop Science Society of America Defenders of Wildlife Environmental and Energy Study Institute Environmental Defense Fund Environmental Working Group Izaak Walton League of America Land Trust Alliance The Minnesota Project National Audubon Society National Wildlife Federation Natural Resources Defense Council Soil Science Society of America Soil and Water Conservation Society Sustainable Agriculture Coalition Union of Concerned Scientists Water Environment Federation World Wildlife Fund
Areas of Focus
Disqus Comments

Related News

Continue Reading

Do billionaires get farm subsidies?

A blockbuster report by the Government Accountability Office revealed that more than 1,300 “high-income” farmers received subsidies from the federal crop insurance program. But Congress has barred the...