Press Release: Updated Tap Water Databases and Drinking Water Quality Analysis
WASHINGTON, DC - Tap water in many large metropolitan areas is polluted with a cocktail of chemical contaminants. These pollutants usually don't violate any legal standards, but they often come in potentially toxic combinations that raise serious questions about the long-term safety of drinking the water. Pensacola, Fla.; Riverside, Calif.; and Las Vegas top the list of major cities with the most contaminated tap water.
In an unprecedented analysis of 20 million tap water quality tests performed by water utilities between 2004 and 2009, Environmental Working Group (EWG) found that water suppliers detected a total of 316 contaminants in water delivered to the public. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has set enforceable standards for only 114 of these pollutants.
Another 202 chemicals with no mandatory safety standards were found in water supplied to approximately 132 million people in 9,454 communities across the country. These "unregulated" chemicals include the toxic rocket fuel component perchlorate, the industrial solvent acetone, the weed killer metolachlor, the refrigerant Freon and radon, a highly radioactive gas.
"The nation's tap water has been compromised by weak federal safeguards and pitiful protection of drinking water supplies," said Jane Houlihan, Senior Vice President for Research at EWG.
By failing to clean up rivers and reservoirs that provide drinking water for hundreds of millions of Americans, EPA and the Congress force water utilities to spend heavily to make contaminated water drinkable. According to industry market studies, utilities spend more than $4 billion a year on water treatment chemicals alone. Less than one-twentieth that amount is invested in source water protection and pollution prevention, an average of $207 million a year.
"Utilities do the best job that they can treating a big problem with limited resources," said Houlihan, "but we must do better. It is not uncommon for people to drink tap water laced with 20 or 30 chemical contaminants. This water may be legal, but it raises serious health concerns. People expect better water than that, and they deserve it."
Federal law does not require tap water to be safe for long-term consumption; the long-term risks of cancer and other health threats are balanced against the cost and feasibility of purification. As a result, health officials acknowledge that legally binding contamination limits typically allow exposure to levels of pollutants that present real health risks. For hundreds of other contaminants there are no legal limits at all -- any amount is legal.
Some communities have made the commitment to deliver safer water, with dramatic results. Boston had a serious contamination problem that peaked in 2004-2005. After installing a new filtration system and changing treatment techniques, the regional water system now delivers some of the highest-rated big city water in the country. It has also committed to a well-protected reservoir system, a key to preserving the long-term effectiveness of the new techniques.
Tap water contaminants come from a wide variety of sources. EWG's analysis revealed 97 agricultural pollutants, including pesticides and chemicals from fertilizer- and manure-laden runoff; 205 industrial chemicals linked to factory discharges and consumer products; 86 contaminants that originate in polluted runoff and wastewater treatment plants; and 42 byproducts of water treatment processes or pollutants that leach from pipes and storage tanks.
"In most U.S. households, pouring a glass of tap water means exposing families to hundreds of distinct chemicals and pollutants, many of them completely unregulated," said Houlihan.
Across the country, consumers are seeing higher bills for their water even as the number of unregulated pollutants, from pharmaceuticals to fuel additives, is also rising.
There is plenty of evidence that Americans already have doubts about the safety of their water. In March 2009, a Gallup poll found that Americans rank water pollution as their number one environmental concern. A startling 84 percent reported being worried "a great deal" or "a fair amount" about pollution in their drinking water.
As a result, millions of Americans have taken to buying bottled water in the misguided belief that it's safer, even though the source of many very popular brands is nothing more than treated tap water.
Until the federal government invests significant resources on modernizing infrastructure and enforcing tough safety standards, the only option left to most Americans is to filter their own tap water.
EWG's searchable database of water test results allows the public to check out the quality of the water in their community, and EWG researchers have also compiled an easy-to-use guide to water filtration systems currently on the market, giving consumers some help when deciding which one works best for themselves and their families. Available online at http://www.ewg.org/tap-water.
Statement from Environmental Working Group on its Tap Water Database
CONTACT: EWG Public Affairs, (202) 667-6982
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: For Immediate Release, December 15, 2009
WASHINGTON, DC-- Environmental Working Group (EWG) would like to expand on the methodology and results of its recent national tap water quality report.
We appreciate the great interest that the study has generated, which confirms our belief that people are concerned about the quality of their tap water.
- All of the data included in the study came directly from the state agencies responsible for drinking water, which obtained the data directly from utilities or state laboratories.
- Prior to the release of the report, EWG worked with the national water utility trade association, the American Water Works Association (AWWA) to provide the utilities represented in the study an opportunity to review and revise the data prior to their release. Many utilities responded, assisting EWG in making adjustments to the state data as needed.
- Since the release of the report this past Saturday, not a single municipal water utility has contacted EWG with data corrections. EWG researchers continue to welcome utilities’ comments and we will revise the results whenever valid data are provided to us.