Connect with Us:

The Power of Information

Facebook Page Twitter @enviroblog Youtube Channel Our RSS Feeds

At EWG,
our team of scientists, engineers, policy experts, lawyers and computer programmers pores over government data, legal documents, scientific studies and our own laboratory tests to expose threats to your health and the environment, and to find solutions. Our research brings to light unsettling facts that you have a right to know.

Privacy Policy
(Updated Sept. 19, 2011)
Terms & Conditions
Reprint Permission Information

Charity Navigator 4 Star

sign up
Optional Member Code

support ewg

Moms should still breast-feed despite chemicals

Categories


Published September 21, 2003

Even though fire-retardant chemicals have been found in the breast milk of nursing mothers, breast-feeding is still healthier for infants than bottle-feeding, according to a national environmental group that has drawn attention to the chemical contaminant issue.

"Even women with very high levels of flame retardants in their breast milk should continue to breast-feed their babies," the Environmental Working Group said in its report, "Mother's Milk."

One reason is that the adverse effects on learning and behavior are strongly associated with fetal exposure to persistent pollutants, not with breast-milk exposure, the report said.

The reason scientists test breast milk for the presence of contaminants like fire retardants is because it's a good indicator of the fetus' level of exposure during gestation.

Another reason to continue breast-feeding is that breast milk appears to help babies overcome some of the harmful effects of high fetal exposure to flame retardants and similar chemicals, the report said.