Who owns the west?

Summary of Mining Plans of Operation in Wyoming.

Jump to: Plan/Notice Owners | Claims | Patents | Map

Location:   

Currently on file with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) are 148 mining plans and notices filed by 23 companies and 20 individuals, encompassing a total estimated area of 34,305 acres of BLM-managed public land in Wyoming. These plans and notices are filed on public land laden with gold, silver, copper and other precious metals and minerals worth billions of dollars. And these operations are only those on BLM lands, not on Forest Service lands, for which mining plans and notices are not entered into the government's LR2000 database that forms the backbone of this site. But whether the mines are on BLM or Forest Service land, none of the corporate revenue is reimbursed to the public. Instead, companies leave behind unfathomable amounts of waste. In 2001 alone, the industry dumped enough mercury nationally to fill a billion thermometers and arsenic in quantities that would pollute all public drinking water supplies for 350 years. In 2001, mines generated 45 percent of all pollution reported in the U.S. while accounting for just 0.36 percent of all industrial facilities.

Quick facts about mining plans on BLM land in Wyoming

• Acres of U.S. public land (BLM land only) under mining plans and notices, estimated: 34,305

• Foreign-owned corporations among top BLM land mine operators: 1 of 10

• Pollution from all US mining operations, ranking among all U.S. industries: : #1 in total toxic releases

• Pollution from top 89 mines in US: 5 times pollution from entire U.S. chemical industry (3,600 plants)

• Western water polluted by mine waste: 40 percent of Western headwaters

• Proposed mining operations that have been blocked by the Department of Interior because they posed a risk to public health or the environment: None

• Other land uses that supercede rights of mining companies to operate on public lands: None

EWG analysis of data compiled by the Bureau of Land Management.


Top Mining Plan/Notice Companies/Individuals on BLM land in Wyoming Ranked by Acres Affected

Companies have been consolidated to account for subsidiaries. View this table without consolidation.

 Company/IndividualHeadquartersNumber of Mining Plans & Notices on BLM landEstimated AcreagePlan Date(s)
1 Total Minerals Corp Casper, WY 1 5,142 1978
2 Bentonite Corp Belle Fourche, SD 5 4,805 1997 to 2000
3 M-I LLC Greybull, WY 2 4,423 2000 to 2003
4 Black Hills Ben LLC Mills, WY 7 3,465 1975 to 1998
5 Cameco Corp World HQ in Canada 15 3,431 1990 to 1997
6 AMCOL International Corp Arlington Heights, IL 11 3,296 1994 to 2003
7 Wyo Ben Inc Billings, MT 12 2,040 1992 to 2003
8 UMETCO Minerals Corp Grand Junction, CO 9 1,967 1982 to 1991
9 Georgia-Pacific Corp Atlanta, GA 3 1,380 1984 to 2002
10 BPB Celotex Corp Cody, WY 1 530 1999
See all plan/notice holders in Wyoming

 

Counties in Wyoming Ranked by Acres Affected by Plans and Notices

 CountyNumber of Mining Plans & Notices on BLM landEstimated Acreage  
1 Big Horn County 20 10,630 details map
2 Crook County 11 5,495 details map
3 Campbell County 1 5,142 details map
4 Natrona County 12 4,914 details map
5 Converse County 7 3,432 details map
6 Johnson County 5 2,970 details map
7 Park County 3 575 details map
8 Fremont County 63 401 details map
9 Lincoln County 2 245 details map
10 Carbon County 3 163 details map
See all counties

 

Examples of Mines in Wyoming

Name of MineLocation of MineMine StatusMetal MinedOwner or Parent Company of Owner
Smith Ranch - HighlandConverse County, WYOpenUraniumPower Resouces Inc.

Source: EWG analysis.

 

Location:   


Source: EWG analysis of Bureau of Land Management's Land and Mineral Records 2000 (LR2000) data system. For claims, acreages are estimated based on maximum allowable size of claims. For patents, acreages are taken directly from the LR2000 database where available, and are estimated based on maximum allowable size of claim that preceded the patent where acreages are not noted in LR2000. All notices are assumed to be five acres in size, and the size of plans are calculated directly as the size of the land represented by the legal land description in the LR2000 database. The acreages we estimate through these methods would tend to overestimate the actual amount. We welcome corrections here, and would welcome a federal data management system that included the acreages involved in these important federal land transactions.