Who owns the west?

Summary of Mining Plans of Operation in Oregon.

Jump to: Plan/Notice Owners | Claims | Patents | Map

Location:   

Currently on file with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) are 646 mining plans and notices filed by 15 companies and 7 individuals, encompassing a total estimated area of 11,753 acres of BLM-managed public land in Oregon. These plans and notices are filed on public land laden with gold, silver, copper and other precious metals and minerals worth billions of dollars. And these operations are only those on BLM lands, not on Forest Service lands, for which mining plans and notices are not entered into the government's LR2000 database that forms the backbone of this site. But whether the mines are on BLM or Forest Service land, none of the corporate revenue is reimbursed to the public. Instead, companies leave behind unfathomable amounts of waste. In 2001 alone, the industry dumped enough mercury nationally to fill a billion thermometers and arsenic in quantities that would pollute all public drinking water supplies for 350 years. In 2001, mines generated 45 percent of all pollution reported in the U.S. while accounting for just 0.36 percent of all industrial facilities.

Quick facts about mining plans on BLM land in Oregon

• Acres of U.S. public land (BLM land only) under mining plans and notices, estimated: 11,753

• Pollution from all US mining operations, ranking among all U.S. industries: : #1 in total toxic releases

• Pollution from top 89 mines in US: 5 times pollution from entire U.S. chemical industry (3,600 plants)

• Western water polluted by mine waste: 40 percent of Western headwaters

• Proposed mining operations that have been blocked by the Department of Interior because they posed a risk to public health or the environment: None

• Other land uses that supercede rights of mining companies to operate on public lands: None

EWG analysis of data compiled by the Bureau of Land Management.


Top Mining Plan/Notice Companies/Individuals on BLM land in Oregon Ranked by Acres Affected

Companies have been consolidated to account for subsidiaries. View this table without consolidation.

 Company/IndividualHeadquartersNumber of Mining Plans & Notices on BLM landEstimated AcreagePlan Date(s)
1 Newmont Mining Corp Denver, CO 4 7,394 1988 to 2003
2 Atlas Precious Metal Vale, OR 2 7,394 1988 to 1990
3 Eagle Picher Minerals Inc Reno, NV 2 811 1985 to 1986
4 Eldorado Resources Durkee, OR 2 746 1997
5 Ironside Mining Co LLC Elko, NV 1 746 0
6 Cornerstone Ind Min Lakeview, OR 2 701 1996
7 Teague Mineral Prod Adrian, OR 8 33 1982 to 2003
8 Amer Absorb Nat Prod Austin, TX 1 40 1997
9 Ron Kemnow Plush, OR 8 0 1998 to 2003
10 Christopher H Rose Reno, NV 6 0 1999 to 2002
See all plan/notice holders in Oregon

 

Counties in Oregon Ranked by Acres Affected by Plans and Notices

 CountyNumber of Mining Plans & Notices on BLM landEstimated Acreage  
1 Malheur County 155 9,241 details map
2 Lake County 75 1,046 details map
3 Baker County 202 503 details map
4 Josephine County 83 410 details map
5 Jackson County 49 246 details map
6 Douglas County 53 149 details map
7 Harney County 10 93 details map
8 Grant County 8 32 details map
9 Deschutes County 2 10 details map
10 Crook County 2 10 details map
See all counties

 

Examples of Mines in Oregon

Name of MineLocation of MineMine StatusMetal MinedOwner or Parent Company of Owner
Ken Snyder MineWallowa County, NVOpenGoldNormandy Midas Operations, Inc.

Source: EWG analysis.

 

Location:   


Source: EWG analysis of Bureau of Land Management's Land and Mineral Records 2000 (LR2000) data system. For claims, acreages are estimated based on maximum allowable size of claims. For patents, acreages are taken directly from the LR2000 database where available, and are estimated based on maximum allowable size of claim that preceded the patent where acreages are not noted in LR2000. All notices are assumed to be five acres in size, and the size of plans are calculated directly as the size of the land represented by the legal land description in the LR2000 database. The acreages we estimate through these methods would tend to overestimate the actual amount. We welcome corrections here, and would welcome a federal data management system that included the acreages involved in these important federal land transactions.