Who owns the west?

Summary of Mining Plans of Operation in New Mexico.

Jump to: Plan/Notice Owners | Claims | Patents | Map

Location:   

Currently on file with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) are 59 mining plans and notices filed by 7 companies and 9 individuals, encompassing a total estimated area of 3,549 acres of BLM-managed public land in New Mexico. These plans and notices are filed on public land laden with gold, silver, copper and other precious metals and minerals worth billions of dollars. And these operations are only those on BLM lands, not on Forest Service lands, for which mining plans and notices are not entered into the government's LR2000 database that forms the backbone of this site. But whether the mines are on BLM or Forest Service land, none of the corporate revenue is reimbursed to the public. Instead, companies leave behind unfathomable amounts of waste. In 2001 alone, the industry dumped enough mercury nationally to fill a billion thermometers and arsenic in quantities that would pollute all public drinking water supplies for 350 years. In 2001, mines generated 45 percent of all pollution reported in the U.S. while accounting for just 0.36 percent of all industrial facilities.

Quick facts about mining plans on BLM land in New Mexico

• Acres of U.S. public land (BLM land only) under mining plans and notices, estimated: 3,549

• Pollution from all US mining operations, ranking among all U.S. industries: : #1 in total toxic releases

• Pollution from top 89 mines in US: 5 times pollution from entire U.S. chemical industry (3,600 plants)

• Western water polluted by mine waste: 40 percent of Western headwaters

• Proposed mining operations that have been blocked by the Department of Interior because they posed a risk to public health or the environment: None

• Other land uses that supercede rights of mining companies to operate on public lands: None

EWG analysis of data compiled by the Bureau of Land Management.


Top Mining Plan/Notice Companies/Individuals on BLM land in New Mexico Ranked by Acres Affected

Companies have been consolidated to account for subsidiaries. View this table without consolidation.

 Company/IndividualHeadquartersNumber of Mining Plans & Notices on BLM landEstimated AcreagePlan Date(s)
1 Phelps Dodge Mining Co Phoenix, AZ 5 1,227 1995 to 2002
2 W E Haney Carlsbad, NM 1 80 0
3 Las Cruces Transit Mix Las Cruces, NM 1 40 0
4 Mayfield Mine Assoc Las Cruces, NM 1 40 1986
5 Uranium King Corp Peralta, NM 1 20 1987
6 ANP Inc Albuquerque, NM 4 0 1995 to 2001
7 Vincent J Lardner Albuquerque, NM 1 10 1990
8 Timothy J Lardner Albuquerque, NM 1 10 1990
9 Scott C Lardner Albuquerque, NM 1 10 1990
10 Lois M Lardner Albuquerque, NM 1 10 1990
See all plan/notice holders in New Mexico

 

Counties in New Mexico Ranked by Acres Affected by Plans and Notices

 CountyNumber of Mining Plans & Notices on BLM landEstimated Acreage  
1 Grant County 12 2,526 details map
2 McKinley County 1 480 details map
3 Luna County 5 219 details map
4 Dona Ana County 7 95 details map
5 Eddy County 1 80 details map
6 Sierra County 9 36 details map
7 Otero County 5 25 details map
8 Cibola County 5 23 details map
9 Sandoval County 1 20 details map
10 Santa Fe County 5 17 details map
See all counties

 

Examples of Mines in New Mexico

Name of MineLocation of MineMine StatusMetal MinedOwner or Parent Company of Owner
Questa Molybdenum MineTaos County, NMOpenMolybdenumMolycorp
Chino Copper MineGrant County, NMSuspendedCopper OrePhelps Dodge
Tyrone Copper (sx-ew) MineGrant County, NMOpenCopper OrePhelps Dodge
CrownpointMckinley County, NMProposedUraniumHydro Resources
ContinentalGrant County, NMSuspendedCopper OrePhelps Dodge

Source: EWG analysis.

 

Location:   


Source: EWG analysis of Bureau of Land Management's Land and Mineral Records 2000 (LR2000) data system. For claims, acreages are estimated based on maximum allowable size of claims. For patents, acreages are taken directly from the LR2000 database where available, and are estimated based on maximum allowable size of claim that preceded the patent where acreages are not noted in LR2000. All notices are assumed to be five acres in size, and the size of plans are calculated directly as the size of the land represented by the legal land description in the LR2000 database. The acreages we estimate through these methods would tend to overestimate the actual amount. We welcome corrections here, and would welcome a federal data management system that included the acreages involved in these important federal land transactions.