Golden Phoenix Miner

Jump to: Case Listings | Ownership Maps

Golden Phoenix Miner is one of 92,125 beneficiaries of a 132-year-old federal mining law that gives away precious metals, minerals, and even the title to the land itself for less than $10 an acre. Golden Phoenix Miner owns the minerals under an estimated 4,220 acres of claimed land giving Golden Phoenix Miner more total land holdings (claims and patents) than 99.5% of all other mining interests.

Information on subsidiaries and parent companies shown here represents our best estimate of corporate structure at the time of this website release, and are drawn from various publicly available sources. Please report any noted omissions and errors to EWG with a credible source or citation. Thank you.

Overview of Ownership

	Claims	Patents	Mining Plans & Notices
Number	205	0	3
Estimated Acreage	4,220	0	N/A
States

N/A = Not Available, data not supplied in BLM's LR2000 database

Find these features on a map.

Source: EWG analysis of US BLM data.

Examples of Mines

These mines are owned by Golden Phoenix Miner, its subsidiaries, or its parent company.

Source: EWG analysis.

Claims

Like all U.S. claimholders, Golden Phoenix Miner acquired ownership of precious metals and minerals on U.S. public land for about $2 per acre, and maintains possession of the claim with a small per-acre fee, typically $5 each year. Golden Phoenix Miner pays no royalties to the federal government for metals and minerals mined from this land.

For Golden Phoenix Miner:

• Ranking among U.S. claimholders: 454 for total acreage claimed of 28,405 total claimholders.
• Current claimed land holdings exceed total claimed acreage for: 98.4% of all other claimants
• Total acres of public lands claimed: 4,220 acres

Claims by State.

Find these features on the map.

Source: EWG analysis of US BLM data.

Mining Plans & Notices on BLM Land

Golden Phoenix Miner is one of the 3,323 mine operators in the U.S. with mining plans and notices on BLM land listed as currently active in government records, operating under laws that allow mining interests to extract and sell precious metals and minerals previously held by the public. Golden Phoenix Miner may also operate mines on Forest Service lands, which are not contained in the LR2000 database that is the backbone of this website. Because the government often fails to promptly close out records for mines no longer active, active mining may be completed for some of the operations represented by plans and notices in this website. The government frequently fails to promptly close out records for plans and notices no longer active. But regardless of the status of mining operations on a particular site, filings of plans and notices are indicative of mining on the property - whether past, present, or planned. Mining operations led by Golden Phoenix Miner may well have left behind permanent pollution. In 2001 mines generated 45 percent of all pollution in EPA's Toxic Release Reporting system while accounting for just 0.36 percent of all industrial facilities.

For Golden Phoenix Miner:

• Ranking among U.S. mine operators for total land encompassed by operation plans on BLM land: 0 of 3,323 U.S. mine operators.
• Land under plans exceeds total plan areas for: over 99.5% of all other operators (BLM-managed lands only)
• Mining plans include 2 notices for mines disturbing no more than five acres and 1 surface management plans for larger mines.

Plans and Notices on BLM land by State.

Find these features on the map.

Source: EWG analysis of US BLM data.

Source: EWG analysis of Bureau of Land Management's Land and Mineral Records 2000 (LR2000) data system. For claims, acreages are estimated based on maximum allowable size of claims. For patents, acreages are taken directly from the LR2000 database where available, and are estimated based on maximum allowable size of claim that preceded the patent where acreages are not noted in LR2000. All notices are assumed to be five acres in size, and the size of plans are calculated directly as the size of the land represented by the legal land description in the LR2000 database. The acreages we estimate through these methods would tend to overestimate the actual amount. We welcome corrections here, and would welcome a federal data management system that included the acreages involved in these important federal land transactions.