Who owns the west?

Equatorial Mining Limited

Jump to: Case Listings | Ownership Maps

Equatorial Mining Limited and its subsidiaries are a few of 92,125 beneficiaries of a 131-year-old federal mining law that gives away precious metals, minerals, and even the title to the land itself for less than $10 an acre. Equatorial Mining Limited and its subsidiaries own the minerals under an estimated 6,112 acres of claimed land giving Equatorial Mining Limited and its subsidiaries more total land holdings (claims and patents) than over 99.5% of all other mining interests.

World Headquarters

Level 4
Sydney, NSW,
CANADA

Subsidiaries Include

Equatorial Min Park (100%)
Equitorial (100%)

Information on subsidiaries and parent companies shown here represents our best estimate of corporate structure at the time of this website release, and are drawn from various publicly available sources. Please report any noted omissions and errors to EWG with a credible source or citation. Thank you.

Overview of Ownership

Statistics on this page include the ownership of subsidiaries. This company does not have any features in their own name.

 ClaimsPatentsMining Plans & Notices
Number336 0 2
Estimated Acreage6,112 0 N/A
States
11111111
11111111
11111111

N/A = Not Available, data not supplied in BLM's LR2000 database

Find these features on a map.

Source: EWG analysis of US BLM data.

Examples of Mines

These mines are owned by Equatorial Mining Limited, its subsidiaries, or its parent company.

Name of MineLocation of MineMine StatusMetal MinedMap Link
Equatorial TonopahNye County, NVClosedCopper Oremap
Equatorial Mineral Park IncMohave County, AZOpenCopper Oremap

Source: EWG analysis.

 

Claims

Like all U.S. claimholders, Equatorial Mining Limited and its subsidiaries acquired ownership of precious metals and minerals on U.S. public land for about $2 per acre, and maintains possession of the claim with a small per-acre fee, typically $5 each year. Equatorial Mining Limited pays no royalties to the federal government for metals and minerals mined from this land.

For Equatorial Mining Limited and its subsidiaries:

Claims by State.

StateNumber of ClaimsEstimated AcreageDate(s)
Arizona 2253,8191881 - 2000
Nevada 1112,2931948 - 1999
U.S. Total 3366,1121881 - 2000

Find these features on the map.

Source: EWG analysis of US BLM data.


Mining Plans & Notices on BLM Land

Equatorial Mining Limited and its subsidiaries are some of the 3,323 mine operators on U.S. BLM lands with mining plans and notices listed as currently active in government records, operating under laws that allow mining interests to extract and sell precious metals and minerals previously held by the public. Equatorial Mining Limited may also operate mines on Forest Service lands, which are not contained in the LR2000 database that is the backbone of this website. Because the government often fails to promptly close out records for mines no longer active, active mining may be completed for some of the operations represented by plans and notices in this website. But regardless of the status of mining operations on a particular site, filings of plans and notices are indicative of mining on the property - whether past, present, or planned. Mining operations led by Equatorial Mining Limited may well have left behind permanent pollution. In 2001 mines generated 45 percent of all pollution in EPA's Toxic Release Reporting system while accounting for just 0.36 percent of all industrial facilities.

For Equatorial Mining Limited and its subsidiaries:

Plans and Notices on BLM land by State.

StateNumber of Plans and Notices on BLM landEstimated AcreageDate(s)
Nevada 201980 - 1991
U.S. Total 201980 - 1991

Find these features on the map.

Source: EWG analysis of US BLM data.



Source: EWG analysis of Bureau of Land Management's Land and Mineral Records 2000 (LR2000) data system. For claims, acreages are estimated based on maximum allowable size of claims. For patents, acreages are taken directly from the LR2000 database where available, and are estimated based on maximum allowable size of claim that preceded the patent where acreages are not noted in LR2000. All notices are assumed to be five acres in size, and the size of plans are calculated directly as the size of the land represented by the legal land description in the LR2000 database. The acreages we estimate through these methods would tend to overestimate the actual amount. We welcome corrections here, and would welcome a federal data management system that included the acreages involved in these important federal land transactions.