Who owns the west?

Mining claims in California

Jump to: Claim Owners | Patents | Mines | Map

Location:   

The hardrock mining industry owns gold, silver, and other precious metals and minerals beneath an estimated 635,225 acres of U.S. public land in California, resources worth millions of dollars a year, acquired for as little as $0.84 per acre and held in perpetuity for a yearly rental fee as low as $0.62 an acre. Under a 132-year-old law originally intended to spur development of the West, an industry dominated by a handful of multinational corporations pays no federal royalties, and leaves behind a landscape of dramatically diminished value, scarred with tunnels, pits, and toxic waste piles.

Quick facts about mining claims in California

• Total number of claim-holders: 7,792

• Acres of public land claimed by the mining industry, estimated: 635,225 (86% of Yosemite National Park)

• Dollars paid for each acre: as little as $0.84, and as little as $0.62 yearly rental fee

• Reimbursement to the federal government for gold, silver and other precious metals taken from public land: $0

• Companies owning minerals on at least 10,000 public acres: 28

• Percentage of claims held by foreign companies: 8%

• Land area ever claimed by the mining industry nationally, estimated: 79 million acres (the size of New Mexico)

EWG analysis of data compiled by the Bureau of Land Management.


Top Mining Claim Owners in California Ranked by Acres Claimed

Companies have been consolidated to account for subsidiaries. View this table without consolidation.

 Company/IndividualHeadquartersNumber of ClaimsAcreage ClaimedDate(s) Filed
1 Glamis Gold LTD World HQ in Canada 1,011 16,564 1896 to 2003
2 Alma K Iverson Costa Mesa, CA 96 15,360 1999 to 2002
3 John E Gates Costa Mesa, CA 95 15,200 2002
4 James M Mills Costa Mesa, CA 95 15,200 2002
5 James R Teed Costa Mesa, CA 95 15,200 2002
6 Priscilla K Gates Costa Mesa, CA 95 15,200 2002
7 Robert Slotten Costa Mesa, CA 95 15,200 2002
8 Mary Ann Mills Costa Mesa, CA 95 15,200 2002
9 James C Teed Costa Mesa, CA 81 12,960 2002
10 Tetra Technologies Inc The Woodlands, TX 562 11,240 1992 to 2001
See all claim holders in California

Some of the claimants in this table may be in partnership with other individuals or companies with a claim to the same land.

 

Counties in California Ranked by Acres Claimed

 CountyNumber of ClaimsEstimated Acreage  
1 San Bernardino County 5,720 175,119 details map
2 Inyo County 2,007 62,398 details map
3 Sierra County 1,264 43,783 details map
4 Kern County 1,242 41,463 details map
5 Plumas County 963 39,636 details map
6 Siskiyou County 1,059 38,251 details map
7 Imperial County 1,505 33,204 details map
8 Placer County 505 25,037 details map
9 Trinity County 540 21,632 details map
10 Nevada County 579 20,217 details map
See all counties

 

Examples of Mines in California

Name of MineLocation of MineMine StatusMetal MinedOwner or Parent Company of Owner
Rand MineSan Bernardino County, CAOpenGoldGlamis Gold Ltd
Briggs Gold MineInyo County, CAOpenGoldCanyon Resources Corporation
Castle Mountain MineSan Bernardino County, CAClosedGoldViceroy Resource Corporation
JamestownStanislaus County, CAClosedGoldSonora Mining Corporation
Mclaughlin Gold MineLake County, CAClosedGoldBarrick Gold Corporation
Mt. Pass Mine & MillSan Bernardino County, CAOpenRare earthsMolycorp
PicachoImperial County, CAClosedGoldGlamis Gold Ltd.
Dredge 21Yuba County, CASuspendedGoldCal-Sierra Development, Inc
Mesquite Gold MineImperial County, CAOpenGoldNewmont Mining Corp
Sixteen To One MineSierra County, CAOpenGoldOriginal Sixteen To One Mine

Source: EWG analysis.

 

Location:   


Source: EWG analysis of Bureau of Land Management's Land and Mineral Records 2000 (LR2000) data system. For claims, acreages are estimated based on maximum allowable size of claims. For patents, acreages are taken directly from the LR2000 database where available, and are estimated based on maximum allowable size of claim that preceded the patent where acreages are not noted in LR2000. All notices are assumed to be five acres in size, and the size of plans are calculated directly as the size of the land represented by the legal land description in the LR2000 database. The acreages we estimate through these methods would tend to overestimate the actual amount. We welcome corrections here, and would welcome a federal data management system that included the acreages involved in these important federal land transactions.