Connect with Us:

The Power of Information

Facebook Page Twitter @enviroblog Youtube Channel Our RSS Feeds

At EWG,
our team of scientists, engineers, policy experts, lawyers and computer programmers pores over government data, legal documents, scientific studies and our own laboratory tests to expose threats to your health and the environment, and to find solutions. Our research brings to light unsettling facts that you have a right to know.

Privacy Policy
(Updated Sept. 19, 2011)
Terms & Conditions
Reprint Permission Information

Charity Navigator 4 Star

BodyBurden

Expert Testimony and Communications Content

EWG Letter to Panel

Dear Dr. Schwartz

EWG Supports EPA's Decision to Suspend CHEERS

Letter to Stephen L. Johnson, EPA Deputy Administrator
The Environmental Working Group (EWG) supports EPA's decision to suspend the Children's Environmental Exposure Research Study, known as CHEERS. EWG requests that Mr. Johnson ensures fair and balanced representation on the panel.

ACC's $2 million Grant to EPA Comes With String Attached

Letter to Dr. Paul Gilman, EPA Assistant Administrator
In the American Chemistry Council's (ACC) Fall 2004 Long-Range Research Initiative Update, (http://www.uslri.org/news.cfm?id=newsletters) the ACC wrote that the $2million payment to participate in the EPA study "also contains considerable leverage, in that $2 million of ACC funds add to $7 million of EPA funds.

EPA Sets an Ominous Precedent

Letter to Michael Leavitt, EPA Administrator
Environmental Working Group is deeply troubled to learn that the EPA has decided to make the lobbying arm of a powerful regulated industry its "partner" in a major chemical research initiative. This agreement relegates the public and independent scientists to second tier status, and it suggests that any polluter or regulated industry can become a full partner with the EPA if the price is right.

EWG Statement on NAS Human Research Report

Letter to Michael R. Taylor, co-chair of the Committee on the Use of Third Party Toxicity Research with Human Research Participants
Environmental Working Group expresses extreme disappointment and concern over a series of glaring omissions in the final report from the NAS Committee on the Use of Third Party Toxicity Research with Human Research Participants.

Statement on Human Testing Before NAS Committee

Statement by Richard Wiles, Before the NAS Committee on Use of Third Party Toxicity Research with Human Participants
EWG is now firmly opposed to direct dosing of human subjects with pesticides, industrial chemicals, or pollutants on both scientific and ethical grounds.