Perfluorochemicals (PFCs): Related News Clips
- 4.16.09 No More Toxic Waste
- 4.1.09 The News Journal: PFOA Elevated in Dupont's Delaware Workers
- 2.12.09 Green Popcorn Project
- 2.10.09 DuPont gets more time to test PFOA
- 2.6.09 Charleston Gazette: DuPont gets more time for C8 studies
- 2.3.09 Nonstick Chemicals Linked to Infertility
- 1.17.09 Level Set for Chemical In Nonstick Products
- 1.16.09 Health Alert Issued on Water Toxin
- 1.15.09 EPA's C8 Advisory Does Not Address Long-term Risks
- 1.15.09 Charleston Gazette: Bush to issue last-minute rules on toxic teflon chemical
- 1.9.09 To ban or not to ban: Bisphenol-A in food is OK with FDA but not with some scientists
- 1.9.09 EPA decides it can't make up its mind on common Inland contaminant
- 12.28.08 State to Reconsider Drinking-Water Standard
- 12.28.08 Dear EarthTalk: Is It True That Some Baby Bottles Contain Chemicals That Can Cause Health Problems For Babies?
- 12.27.08 State reviewing standard for water contaminant found throughout IE
- 12.26.08 Green Kitchen: Eco-Friendly Pots and Pans
- 12.12.08 Teflon Lawsuits Won't Become Class Action
- 11.6.08 DuPont finds high levels of C8 in Chinese workers
- 10.2.08 Nine ways to avoid household toxins
- 9.10.08 California Activists Lose Bids to Strengthen EPA Pact ON PFOA Chemicals
- 8.28.08 California Assembly Approves PFOA Ban on Food Wraps
- 8.21.08 California Fails to Pass Chemical Ban in Baby Products
- 8.20.08 Progress Against Toxins In Toys Takes Small Steps
- 8.10.08 Report: Elderly At Higher Risk From Hazards Found in Homes
- 8.5.08 California Considers Banning PFOAs
- 8.5.08 Teflon Chemical Causes Cancer In Trout and Why I Care.
- 8.5.08 EPA and State of California Consider Ban on PFOA, Often Used in Nonstick Packaging
- 7.31.08 California to Ban Carcinogenic Food Packaging Chemical DuPont Claims is Safe
- 7.30.08 Some Toxins With Your Popcorn?
- 7.30.08 Carcinogen Worries Stick to Food Packaging
- 6.30.08 Senator Hopes Bill Will Stick
- 6.10.08 Enviro Group Says C8 Substitutes Not Safe
- 5.14.08 Chemical Used to Make Non-Stick Coatings Harmful to Health
- 5.6.08 Dangerous Teflon Not Worth Celebrating
- 4.17.08 USA Today: High Chemical Levels Found in Dogs and Cats
- 3.17.08 AP: Lawmakers Probe EPA Conflicts
- 3.11.08 My Chemical Romance
- 3.4.08 Bill Would Ban ‘Teflon Chemicals’ In Food Packaging
- 2.18.08 Are Chemicals Altering The Planet?
- 2.15.08 Losing Another Winnable War: "Yes We Can" Conquer Childhood Cancer
- 2.14.08 Chemical Used In Non-Stick Cookware Continues to Prove Its Toxicity
- 10.16.07 No Criminal Charges Over Teflon Chemical
- 9.12.07 The Sticky Teflon Problem
- 9.2.07 Reports About Plastic Contaminants Raise Parents' Concerns
- 8.13.07 On The Other Hand
- 8.11.07 Coated Pots And Pans Can Present Health Hazards
- 7.29.07 Should You Chuck Your Teflon Cookware?
- 6.9.07 Teflon Is Forever
- 5.10.07 Scotchgard
- 5.1.07 Perfluoroalkyl Acids: What Is the Evidence Telling Us?
- 4.25.07 Amazing popovers are versatile pastry
- 4.18.07 How tainted is the water we drink?
- 4.11.07 New Jersey dives into PFOA water guidance
- 2.7.07 DuPont to eliminate PFOA packaging chemical by 2015
- 2.6.07 DuPont promises to end PFOA use by 2015
- 2.5.07 DuPont sets goal of eliminating Teflon processing chemical
- 1.4.07 Toxic Teflon: Compounds from Household Products Found in Human Blood
- 10.26.06 MDEQ whitewashed PFOA, protects polluter profits
- 10.18.06 DuPont Says Study Shows Teflon Chemical Isn't Deadly (Update1)
- 10.18.06 Teflon chemical safe, DuPont report says
- 10.17.06 DuPont to Study Chemical's Health Impact
- 10.14.06 Teflon Is Great for Politicians, but Is It Safe for Regular People?
- 10.10.06 Chemical company DuPont to focus on green technology, sustainable resources
- 10.5.06 A Tale of Teflon
- 9.27.06 Teflon issue
- 9.14.06 Red light PFOA now
- 9.13.06 DEQ still to set PFOA hearing
- 8.20.06 PFOA release needs more study
- 8.16.06 We should pay attention to the canary in the kitchen
- 8.9.06 Commercial chemicals' safety unknown
- 7.24.06 3M still studying contaminated fields
- 7.17.06 The Healthy Home: Kitchens And Bathrooms
- 6.26.06 Q & A Today's Mailbag
- 6.13.06 Farewell to Teflon
- 6.7.06 In Search of a Pan That Lets Cooks Forget About Teflon
- 6.2.06 EPA stands firm on C8 stance
- 5.31.06 USW backs suit against DuPont over chemical
- 5.29.06 To non-stick, say 'non, merci', group urges
- 5.29.06 Coming to terms with perils of non-stick products
- 5.11.06 DuPont confident lawsuit on the dangers of Teflon won't stick
- 5.9.06 Popcorn Bags
- 5.1.06 Keep Your Cool When Using Teflon
- 4.28.06 3M fined for chemical used in Decatur
- 4.25.06 Protest set for Wilmington, Del. DuPont meeting
- 4.25.06 Burnt Offgassings: Tales of Teflon
- 4.21.06 Teflon debate a sticky situation
- 4.20.06 Lawsuit against DuPont alleges it failed to warn of the dangers of cooking with Teflon-coated pots and pans
- 4.19.06 DuPont Under Fire for Teflon Fumes
- 4.19.06 Iowa Lawsuit To Test Teflon
- 4.3.06 Teflon lawsuit turns nation's eye to D.M.
- 3.28.06 Food scares
- 3.22.06 Diet Detective
- 3.21.06 Safety concerns adhere to nonstick chemicals
- 3.19.06 Another polluter not needed
- 3.16.06 Chemical warrants warnings on products
- 3.9.06 EPA admits C8 may be unsafe for humans
- 2.28.06 Nonstick pans caught up in a sticky controversy
- 2.27.06 Scientist issues PFC report
- 2.25.06 Industrial chemical found in fish near Cottage Grove
- 2.22.06 The Weinberg proposal
- 2.22.06 Steelworkers lead Teflon chemical warnings
- 2.22.06 Too Hot to Handle?
- 2.22.06 Groups seek warning Prop. 65 label for non-stick products
- 2.16.06 Panel links 3M chemical to cancer
- 2.16.06 Board: Teflon Chemical a Likely Carcinogen
- 2.14.06 Safety Concerns May Stick to Teflon
- 2.12.06 Chemical fear sticks to more than just Teflon
- 2.9.06 Teflon issue
- 2.8.06 Is there life after teflon?
- 2.8.06 As Teflon Troubles Pile Up, DuPont Responds With Ads
- 2.4.06 Del. plant releases C8-type chemicals
- 2.4.06 After PCBs, the next big thing
- 2.3.06 Nonstick chemicals raise sticky questions
- 2.2.06 Cancer-threat chemical can be controlled, researcher says
- 2.1.06 Science that sticks: Chemist's work behind U.S. decision to ban chemical
- 1.31.06 C8 a likely cancer risk, federal report says
- 1.31.06 Review panel: Teflon chemical a likely carcinogen
- 1.27.06 PFOA
- 1.27.06 Are Teflon Pans Safe?
- 1.27.06 DuPont plant will work to contain chemical
- 1.27.06 EPA can end the back-and-forth of this region
- 1.27.06 EPA Urges Teflon Chemical Ban
- 1.27.06 Teflon under fire for toxicity
- 1.26.06 E.P.A. Seeks to Phase Out a Toxic Chemical
- 1.26.06 The End of Teflon
- 1.26.06 EPA tries to curb use of Teflon chemical
- 1.26.06 C8 levels to drop under voluntary EPA program
- 1.26.06 Medical Report on Teflon
- 1.26.06 EPA Calls for End to Releases of Chemical in Teflon Process
- 1.26.06 Teflon Worries
- 1.26.06 DuPont to Try to Reduce Chemical in Teflon
- 1.26.06 Teflon Dangers?
- 1.26.06 Could its decisive moves on PFOA mean DuPont really has a heart?
- 1.26.06 First on CNBC: Investigating Teflon
- 1.26.06 DuPont to phase out Teflon byproduct
- 1.26.06 Teflon chemical on EPA hit list
- 1.26.06 Teflon Dangers?
- 1.26.06 US asks co's to slash output of Teflon compound
- 1.26.06 EPA Warning on Teflon Agreement
- 1.26.06 A Closer Look: Teflon Safety
- 1.26.06 Harmful Teflon Chemical To Be Eliminated by 2015
- 1.26.06 A Closer Look: Teflon Safety
- 1.25.06 Government moves to curb use of chemical in Teflon
- 1.25.06 EPA Program Could Eliminate Teflon Chemical
- 1.25.06 DuPont Agrees to Reduce Use of Teflon Chemical
- 1.25.06 U.S. EPA Seeks Elimination of Teflon Chemical by 2015
- 1.25.06 EPA acts to curtail potential carcinogen
- 1.18.06 EPA urged to monitor DuPont N.C. Plant
- 1.18.06 North Carolina residents petition for expanded C8 investigation
- 1.13.06 DuPont Teflon chemical C8 found in Ohio stream, bottled water
- 1.10.06 Could Teflon Be Harming Your Health?
- 1.6.06 DuPont in Sticky Situation Over Teflon Chemical
- 1.2.06 Public needs to know about health hazards
- 12.21.05 EPA proposing to reduce toxic release reporting
- 12.15.05 DuPont settles case on toxins
- 12.15.05 DuPont fined $16.5 million by the EPA
- 12.15.05 DuPont agrees to pay $16.5 million in EPA settlement
- 12.15.05 DuPont settles EPA case on Teflon chemical
- 12.15.05 DuPont to pay record fine in Teflon settlement
- 12.15.05 DuPont Settles Charges That It Hid Toxic Risk Data
- 12.15.05 DuPont agrees to $10M fine in C8 case
- 12.15.05 DuPont to Pay $16.5 Million for Unreported Risks
- 12.15.05 DuPont to pay $10.25M fine, $6.25M for research
- 12.15.05 DuPont, EPA Settle Chemical Complaint
- 12.14.05 DuPont Settles With EPA
- 12.14.05 DuPont to pay $10 million federal fine
- 12.14.05 EPA Fines DuPont $16.5M for Teflon Cover-Up
- 12.14.05 DuPont to pay $16.5 million in EPA case
- 12.14.05 Dupont fined more than $10 million over Teflon reporting
- 12.14.05 DuPont Analysis
- 12.9.05 Friday Consumer Alert: Teflon
- 12.8.05 Food containers need attention
- 12.6.05 Top Engineer: DuPont Hid Dangers for Years of Chemical Within Teflon, Paper Products
- 12.2.05 State lawmakers grill MPCA about 3M chemicals
- 12.2.05 State plan angered 3M official, MPCA officials tell panel
- 12.2.05 Two testify 3M tried to avoid tests
- 12.1.05 Legislative hearing raises questions about MPCA, 3M relationship
- 11.30.05 DuPont, EPA Settle Case On Chemical Disclosure
- 11.30.05 Public, regulators and regulated are in the dark about DuPont
- 11.29.05 DuPont seeking cause of seepage
- 11.21.05 DuPont on defensive over PFOA allegation
- 11.21.05 DuPont hit by allegations over safety of packaging chemical
- 11.20.05 Whistleblower Raises Serious Concerns Over Teflon-Related DuPont Chemical Used to Coat Billions of Food Containers
- 11.19.05 Chemical faces scrutiny
- 11.18.05 Brian Ross Investigates: Toxic Food Wrappers?
- 11.18.05 Consumer Alert: Teflon
- 11.18.05 The MPCA's mission has gone astray
- 11.18.05 Whistleblower Questions Teflon's Safety
- 11.17.05 Ex-Employee Calls DuPont Negligent
- 11.17.05 Engineer: DuPont hid facts about paper coating
- 11.17.05 Group says DuPont hid dangers of coating
- 11.17.05 C8 dangers covered up, DuPont
- 11.17.05 More Dangers With C-8?
- 11.16.05 Whistle-blower: DuPont knows food-packaging risk
- 11.16.05 Hidden risks of Teflon-like chemical raised by documents, company insider
- 11.14.05 Food wrappers have excess C8, engineer says
- 11.6.05 Thousands sign up for C8 health screening
- 11.5.05 DuPont: $1 billion a year at stake on C8
- 10.27.05 Iron, steel healthy alternatives to Teflon
- 10.26.05 Pollution researcher says agency hindered her work
- 10.26.05 Lawmakers looking into 3M chemicals, 'outrageous' allegations
- 10.26.05 Amid controversy, MPCA paying more attention to 3M chemicals
- 10.25.05 MPCA scientist says bosses tried to silence her
- 10.25.05 MPCA scientist tells lawmakers her research on 3M chemicals was blocked
- 10.24.05 Scientist finds self at center of storm
- 10.16.05 Agencies widen study of toxins in fish
- 10.8.05 Teflon and Cancer
- 9.1.05 Harper's Index
- 8.27.05 Nonstick Pollution Sticks in People
- 8.21.05 Caution urged for contact with C8
- 8.16.05 So Far, So Good in Study of C8
- 8.16.05 University of Pennsylvania C8 Study Recommendations Presented to Little Hocking Consumers
- 8.16.05 Avoid C8 water, researcher says
- 8.12.05 DuPont C8 Tests OK With EPA
- 8.11.05 C8 Investigation Could Provoke Nationwide Testing
- 8.3.05 Sticky situation: debate over safety of Teflon
- 8.3.05 Activists ask for oversight over DuPont
- 8.1.05 Chem plant under microscope
- 7.29.05 High C8 chemical levels reported in Ohio
- 7.27.05 Is There an Extra Ingredient in Nonstick Pans?
- 7.27.05 Pans and packages, oh my
- 7.27.05 Turning up the heat on Teflon
- 7.25.05 DuPont stuck with Teflon lawsuits
- 7.24.05 Will Environmental Fear Stick to DuPont's Teflon?
- 7.23.05 Ohioans show high levels of C8 in blood
- 7.20.05 Independent tests find higher levels of C8
- 7.19.05 Suit Being Filed Against DuPont Over Teflon
- 7.19.05 Teflon firm faces fresh lawsuit
- 7.19.05 Local law firms to lead Teflon class action
- 7.17.05 Miss. DuPont plant facing lawsuits
- 7.17.05 It's toxic, but DuPont wants it near homes
- 7.14.05 Possible dangers of using nonstick cookware
- 7.12.05 DuPont Agrees on Payback for Pollution Claims
- 7.12.05 Teflon Safety Gets Closer Look
- 7.10.05 DuPont Proposed, Dropped '81 Study of C8, Birth Defects
- 7.7.05 Group calls for Timmermeyer to quit over C8
- 7.7.05 DuPont disputes EPA's C-8 review
- 7.7.05 Review board members differ on potential risks of Teflon chemical
- 7.6.05 Government Tries to Solve C8 Puzzle
- 7.6.05 Teflon and Safety: Chemical Likely a Carcinogen
- 7.6.05 Teflon and Safety Chemical Likely a Carcinogen
- 7.4.05 EPA panel: PFOA likely to cause cancer
- 7.3.05 DuPont lawyer edited DEP's C8 media releases
- 7.2.05 Teflon in cancer risk spotlight again
- 6.30.05 According to report, C8 'likely carcinogen'
- 6.30.05 Panel calls chemical a 'likely carcinogen'
- 6.30.05 Citizens uneasy over EPA report that says C8
- 6.29.05 Does Teflon Chemical Cause Cancer?
- 6.29.05 PFOA, chemical found in Teflon, may be cancer-causing agent
- 6.29.05 C8 a 'likely carcinogen,' EPA panel concludes
- 6.29.05 EPA: DuPont's C-8 a 'likely' carcinogen
- 6.29.05 Board: Teflon Cancer Risks Downplayed
- 6.29.05 Teflon Troubles
- 6.29.05 Panel's Report Connects C8 More Strongly to Cancer
- 6.29.05 Compound in Teflon A 'Likely Carcinogen'
- 6.15.05 The Sticking Point
- 6.7.05 Teflon in a sticky situation
- 5.28.05 Board wants more review of DEP's C8 deal
- 5.26.05 DuPont monitors chemical pollution
- 5.26.05 Chemical found in groundwater near DuPont plant in Fayetteville
- 5.24.05 DuPont shareholders seek SEC probe
- 5.20.05 Feds seek DuPont records
- 5.20.05 DuPont faces C8 criminal probe
- 5.19.05 DuPont's Latest Battle
- 5.19.05 Jury seeks DuPont Teflon documents
- 5.19.05 Teflon trouble
- 5.19.05 DuPont Subpoenaed in Teflon-Ingredient Health Probe
- 5.18.05 No deal: Pollution scuttles plant
- 5.13.05 Food Plant Lawsuit
- 5.13.05 Teflon Precursor Possible Cause of Birth Defects
- 5.12.05 Lawsuit: C8 in water scuttled $36m Parkersburg plant deal
- 5.7.05 DuPont settles charges over C8 Government said chemical giant hides info about dangers
- 5.7.05 DuPont settles in Teflon case
- 4.26.05 DuPont Investors Want Full Disclosure of Teflon Costs
- 4.22.05 United Steelworkers to Paper Companies: Beware of Zonyl
- 4.21.05 Union contacts paper companies about safety of DuPont chemical
- 4.6.05 Uneasy about Nonstick Cookware?
- 3.23.05 Study says household dust holds dangerous chemicals
- 3.21.05 Permits reissued for DuPont landfill in Wood County
- 3.20.05 There's something in the air, and it may be coming from your carpet
- 3.17.05 DU finds no Teflon-related contamination in water, but lawsuit test results disagree
- 3.16.05 3M to slash use of toxic chemical
- 3.16.05 3M to stop making chemical
- 3.16.05 Chemical industry to use less C8 in its products
- 3.16.05 Industry vows to reduce chemical used to make nonstick coatings
- 3.11.05 More 3M water testing urged
- 3.1.05 Judge approves DuPont settlement
- 2.27.05 Chemical In Non-Stick Cookware Causes Concern
- 1.17.05 Negative Findings Could Stick To Teflon Maker
- 1.13.05 EPA says C8 could pose potential health risk
- 1.13.05 EPA Taps Outside Experts to Solve Teflon Enigma
- 1.13.05 EPA draft cites 'important' Teflon issues
- 1.13.05 Teflon Chemical's Potential Risk Cited
- 1.12.05 DuPont Teflon Chemical Has Cancer Potential, EPA Says
- 1.12.05 Employees who work near C-8 show increased cholesterol levels
- 1.12.05 DuPont study finds no link between C8, health problems
- 12.23.04 Teflon production linked to cholesterol
- 12.16.04 DuPont, EPA Spar Over Chemical in Teflon
- 12.7.04 EPA challenges DuPont on C-8 reports
- 11.30.04 The Sticking Point
- 11.26.04 DuPont Didn't Disclose Reports on Teflon Risks, Officials Charge
- 11.25.04 EPA raises C-8 reporting concerns
- 11.25.04 Alarm bells silent on Teflon
- 11.25.04 EPA Moves to Widen Case Against DuPont
- 11.24.04 $70 million health study for Teflon chemical
- 11.24.04 Teflon: the miracle comes unstuck
- 11.19.04 DuPont Faces New Complaint; Group Says Firm Withheld Plaintiffs' Blood Test Results
- 11.18.04 DuPont accused of deceit on C-8
- 11.18.04 DuPont found high C8 in blood, study shows
- 11.18.04 US Environmental Agency has not ruled out more charges against Dupont
- 11.17.04 Environmental Group petitions for records of federal meetings
- 11.4.04 The Sticking Point: Debate Over Teflon
- 10.14.04 3M faces Cottage Grove suit; Chemical-contamination claim joins two others filed in Alabama
- 10.4.04 Council warns of Teflon use
- 10.2.04 3M suit targets plant in South
- 9.26.04 3M lawsuit draws a crowd
- 9.19.04 Teflon mystery raises safety questions
- 9.10.04 DuPont settles pollution lawsuit
- 9.10.04 Settlement in DuPont Water Suit
- 9.10.04 DuPont will settle C-8 lawsuit
- 9.9.04 DuPont settles water pollution case for $300M
- 9.9.04 DuPont OKs C8 suit settlement
- 9.3.04 C8 study needs more people
- 9.3.04 Lawyers in DuPont C8 trial get more time for depositions
- 9.3.04 C-8 under the Microscope
- 9.3.04 Study begins on chemical used to make Teflon
- 9.1.04 Judge assigned in DuPont PFOA case
- 9.1.04 Judge named in DuPont Teflon chemical case - EPA
- 8.31.04 DuPont To Wait for Court Date
- 8.31.04 DuPont rejects mediation on C-8 charge
- 8.31.04 Judge to be assigned in DuPont case - report
- 8.20.04 A Little Too Slick?
- 8.18.04 DuPont should determine with EPA potential C-8 risk
- 8.17.04 For DuPont, the C-8 controversy is going to stick around
- 8.17.04 China's Zhejiang Supor Cookware opens flat in Shenzhen debut
- 8.17.04 Contaminants in the Blood
- 8.16.04 Non-stick chemical sticks around too long: Environment Canada
- 8.15.04 Former 3M chemicals showing up in remote places
- 8.15.04 Former 3M chemical is widespread
- 8.13.04 DuPont Defends Its Reporting on Teflon Ingredient
- 8.13.04 DuPont denies keeping its reports on chemical from EPA
- 8.13.04 DuPont says again it met disclosure rules
- 8.13.04 DuPont denies failure to report Teflon risks
- 8.13.04 EPA stands by action on C-8
- 8.12.04 DuPont denies allegations
- 8.12.04 DuPont Challenges EPA Claim on Teflon Risks
- 8.10.04 DuPont Under Fire for Teflon Chemical PFOA
- 8.9.04 "Toxic" Teflon chemical pervades human blood stream
- 8.8.04 DuPont, Now in the Frying Pan
- 8.1.04 DuPont faces class-action suit on Teflon
- 7.29.04 DuPont sets aside $45M for lawsuit
- 7.29.04 The $45 Million Defense
- 7.23.04 Environment 'hot' topic in seeking change
- 7.22.04 Unhappy at teflon tag
- 7.21.04 Teflon comes unstuck in China `mass panic'
- 7.20.04 DuPont
- 7.20.04 Toxic Chemical Exposure
- 7.15.04 EPA Holds DuPont
- 7.13.04 Dupont Hid Possible Health Risk, EPA Says
- 7.13.04 EPA alleges DuPont failed to report information about the hazards of C8
- 7.13.04 DuPont says Teflon-coated cookware is safe following allegations
- 7.12.04 EPA Says DuPont Withheld Data on Teflon Chemical Risk
- 7.9.04 Fine not likely to hurt DuPont's profits
- 7.9.04 EPA alleges DuPont failed to report information about the hazards of C8
- 7.9.04 DuPont faces fine over C-8 reporting
- 7.9.04 EPA to Fine DuPont for Silence on Teflon Chemical
- 7.9.04 DuPont may face massive EPA fine
- 7.9.04 EPA Says DuPont Withheld Chemical's Danger
- 7.8.04 DuPont faces big fines
- 7.8.04 Abraham hits his stride at energy agency
- 7.8.04 EPA to act against DuPont for not reporting chemical risks
- 7.6.04 Little Hocking water customers get C8 notice
- 7.1.04 Perfluorinated chemicals: Jumping from frying pan to fire?
- 6.28.04 EPA investigation nears end; DuPont's culpability at issue
- 6.27.04 Findings in Teflon studies send DuPont down slippery slope
- 6.25.04 EPA will conduct studies of C-8
- 6.25.04 EPA to make independent inquiry of PFOA in environment
- 6.21.04 Region is
- 6.18.04 EPA taking formal action against DuPont
- 6.18.04 DuPont defends Teflon ingredient as EPA signals fight ahead
- 6.17.04 DuPont could face EPA action
- 6.17.04 EPA may act soon against Dupont
- 6.17.04 EPA to Act Against DuPont for an Ingredient in Teflon
- 6.17.04 DuPont facing EPA action on C-8
- 5.8.04 DuPont papers will be unsealed
- 5.5.04 Study links C8 to higher cancer rates
- 4.30.04 DuPont to study workers' health; goal is to determine impact of C8
- 4.30.04 DuPont to test workers for C8
- 4.22.04 Bringing Earth Day Home
- 2.2.04 Mountain Cooking: Teflon coated cookware is not a good choice
- 12.16.03 Another Fast-Food Fear
- 12.14.03 CDC sniffs out Scotchgard
- 11.17.03 Transcript: Teflon Flu
- 11.14.03 SAFE OR SORRY? NEW EVIDENCE REVEALS DANGERS OF TEFLON
- 11.1.03 DuPont's Teflon Dilemma
- 10.1.03 Danger in the skillet zone
- 9.29.03 Littleton water supply contaminated, unsafe to drink
- 9.27.03 Examining the water we drink: Concerns about C8 linger
- 8.18.03 DEAR DESI
- 8.17.03 Health Study may Include C8
- 8.6.03 Public has a right to know about carcinogens
- 8.1.03 Teflon may be hazardous
- 7.28.03 C8 also found in some McDonald's packaging
- 7.26.03 Research group presses fast food industry for facts on packaging
- 7.17.03 Warnings on Teflon products not required
- 7.14.03 SPI reaches tentative pact on PFOA tests
- 7.14.03 EPA Investigates Group's Charge Regarding PFOA
- 7.12.03 Teflon Warning Label Rejected
- 7.5.03 A link to more information
- 7.3.03 DuPont is Developing Own Way to Filter C8
- 7.1.03 Kentucky Firm Claims It Can Reduce C8 Levels
- 7.1.03 Teflon et décalage toxique
- 6.29.03 Launching a debut for an old product;
- 6.27.03 Supreme Court to hear DuPont petitions
- 6.26.03 EPA Committees Meeting on C8
- 6.21.03 Federal Agencies Press For Inventory Of Products With C8
- 6.16.03 DuPont Needs to Get Priorities Straight
- 6.7.03 EPA, DuPont Debate Conditions for Chemical Study
- 6.7.03 Sticky Situation
- 6.7.03 EPA asks DuPont for Teflon evidence
- 6.7.03 EPA hears from local citizens
- 6.6.03 Chemical contamination widespread in eastern county's water
- 6.6.03 Local rep to monitor hearing about C8
- 6.5.03 Chemicals under scrutiny found in California kids, San Diego birds
- 6.2.03 County citizens to participate in C8 hearing
- 6.2.03 Death by the range
- 5.29.03 Our Opinion: Community urged to submit C8 comments
- 5.28.03 Scotchgard is attractive again
- 5.28.03 EPA hearing on C8 draws interest
- 5.27.03 New EPA leader may affect C8 inquiry
- 5.21.03 Teflon dangers
- 5.20.03 Teflon pans can create a sticky situation when overheated
- 5.20.03 Out of the Frying Pan, Into a Fire
- 5.17.03 Environmental group lobbies for warnings on Teflon cookware
- 5.16.03 Concern about Teflon and Birds Heats Up
- 5.15.03 Enviros call for warning label on Teflon
- 5.15.03 Environmental group warns of the danger of Teflon cookware
- 5.15.03 Teflon bad for birds: environmental group
- 5.15.03 U.S. Urged to Put Warning Labels on Teflon Pans
- 5.15.03 Fox5 On Call: Could Non-Stick Pans Be Damaging Your Health?
- 5.15.03 Canaries in the Kitchen
- 5.12.03 Non-stick pans raising health fears
- 5.8.03 DuPont to appeal Wood Co. judge's order in C8 case
- 5.8.03 Judge: DuPont chemical is toxic
- 5.7.03 Judge Hill: C-8 is toxic to humans
- 5.6.03 Teflon Dangers
- 5.1.03 DuPont chief defends C-8
- 4.22.03 EPA seeks citizen input on C8
- 4.19.03 DuPont told to pay for C8 blood tests
- 4.19.03 DuPont must test residents
- 4.18.03 Teflon Chemical to be Reviewed
- 4.16.03 EPA steps up study of Teflon chemical risk to humans
- 4.16.03 Sticking Point With Teflon
- 4.16.03 Feds continue to look at C8
- 4.16.03 EPA to study safety of chemical used in making Teflon
- 4.15.03 Regulators challenge safety of chemical used to make Teflon
- 4.15.03 DuPont chemical under scrutiny
- 4.15.03 EPA Probes Widely Used Chemical
- 4.15.03 Chemicals: Health Concerns Prompt EPA to Intensify Review of Teflon Ingredient
- 4.15.03 EPA worried about chemical found in household items
- 4.15.03 EPA plans additional study of C8's impact
- 4.15.03 Common chemical may cause deaths, defects
- 4.15.03 DuPont confronted over chemical's safety
- 4.15.03 E.P.A. Orders Companies to Examine Effects of Chemicals
- 4.15.03 EPA Ponders Synthetic Chemical's Human Risk;
- 4.14.03 EPA to investigate claim DuPont hid chemical risk
- 4.14.03 EPA Launches Probe Into Chemical Found In Many Products
- 4.14.03 Research Group Alleges Dupont Withheld Toxic Finding
- 4.14.03 EPA steps up study of Teflon chemical risk to humans
- 4.14.03 EPA to investigate chemical found in many household items
- 4.11.03 Advocacy Group Accuses DuPont Of Hiding Birth-Defect Data
- 4.9.03 Group Says C8 Use Should Stop
- 4.5.03 DuPont Chemical Showing Up in Blood of Children, Adults;
- 4.4.03 Draft EPA Reports Finds Risks From Teflon Ingredient
- 4.4.03 Concerns grow about risk from DuPont chemical C8
- 4.1.03 Non-stick chemical could be health hazard: environmental group
- 4.1.03 Teflon Coming Under Fire
- 3.30.03 Chemical Used in Teflon Production May Pose Threat
- 3.29.03 Chemical Might Pose Health Risk to Younger Women and Girls
- 3.29.03 Report cites potential danger of C8
- 3.28.03 DuPont Chemical May Harm Females
- 3.28.03 DuPont's C8 risks greater than acceptable, feds find
- 3.28.03 EPA says women, children more susceptible to C8 risks than men
- 3.19.03 DuPont says C8 emissions down
- 3.19.03 DuPont: C8 emissions to drop dramatically
- 3.14.03 State regulators ask DuPont for more data on C8 emissions
- 3.13.03 DEP to enforce limits on amount of C8 discharged into the air
- 3.13.03 EPA limits C8 airborne emissions
- 3.13.03 C8 Study 'Tainted,' Group Says Governor Urged to Appoint an Independent Panel
- 3.12.03 C8 Dispute Leaves Citizens Confused
- 3.11.03 Group wants EPA probe of DuPont, report on C8
- 3.9.03 DuPont officials says chemical process is safe
- 3.8.03 DuPont criticizes report from Little Hocking residents
- 3.7.03 Residents may have significant amount of C8 in blood
- 3.5.03 Neighbors of Parkersburg, W.Va., DuPont Plant Fear C8 Contamination
- 2.23.03 DuPont Chemical Worries Ohio EPA
- 2.16.03 Internal warnings
- 1.9.03 An Ohio EPA study about C8 is needed
- 1.4.03 Environmental group presses DuPont for C8 information
- 12.2.02 West Virginia to Review Assessment Of Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate
- 11.20.02 Cosmetics Industry Approves Controversial Chemicals
- 11.18.02 EPA gears up to study DuPont chemical
- 11.17.02 Group says W.VA. C8 record is
- 11.15.02 Group calls for further C8 research
- 11.15.02 DEP wrong on DuPont danger to neighbors, report says
- 11.14.02 Group asks state for another review of DuPont chemical
- 1.13.02 Environmentalists question EPA's priorities
- 1.7.02 A Teflon Correspondent