Personal care products: Related News Clips
- 6.29.09 Huff Post: Kid-Safe Chemicals Act
- 6.12.09 Daily Green: Medical Group Says We Should Avoid Bisphenol A
- 6.11.09 NPR: Power Breakfast
- 6.1.09 Your Health: Sunscreen isn't just about SPF
- 5.29.09 Gulf of Mexico Dead Zone
- 5.29.09 Environmental group: Target U.S. aid at most polluted waters in Iowa
- 5.26.09 Johnson & Johnson Asked to Remove Chemicals from Baby Shampoo
- 3.26.09 Scientific American: Nanoparticles in Sunscreen Damage Microbes
- 3.19.09 ABC 7 News: Toxic Tub?
- 3.19.09 ABC 7 News: Toxic Tub?
- 3.16.09 SF Chronicle: '10 Americans' Hits Home for Mill Valley Mom
- 3.13.09 U.S. Lawmakers Move to Ban BPA from Food, Beverage Containers
- 3.13.09 Many Baby Bath Products Contain Carcinogens, Report Finds
- 3.12.09 The Examiner: New pesticide guide - which fruits and veggies have the most?
- 3.12.09 Peaches Are Not Peachy
- 3.5.09 Baby Bottle Companies to Stop Using BPA
- 2.12.09 Green Popcorn Project
- 2.5.09 Newly Identified Toxic Chemical Is Common in Cosmetics
- 2.3.09 EWG: Lautenberg Vows '09 Action On Chemical Reform
- 2.3.09 Oxybenzone Sunscreens Aren't Safe
- 1.28.09 New Research Adds to Indictments Against Bisphenol A and Phthalates
- 1.17.09 Level Set for Chemical In Nonstick Products
- 1.16.09 Health Alert Issued on Water Toxin
- 1.15.09 EPA's C8 Advisory Does Not Address Long-term Risks
- 1.9.09 To ban or not to ban: Bisphenol-A in food is OK with FDA but not with some scientists
- 1.9.09 EPA decides it can't make up its mind on common Inland contaminant
- 12.31.08 Faulting Mercury Study, EPA Fights FDA Bid To Ease Fish Intake Limit
- 12.28.08 State to Reconsider Drinking-Water Standard
- 12.28.08 Dear EarthTalk: Is It True That Some Baby Bottles Contain Chemicals That Can Cause Health Problems For Babies?
- 12.27.08 State reviewing standard for water contaminant found throughout IE
- 12.26.08 Green Kitchen: Eco-Friendly Pots and Pans
- 12.17.08 ASK DR. WEIL: Local or organic?
- 12.9.08 Are natural antibacterial sanitizers healther or more eco friendly?
- 12.3.08 In season: Navel Oranges and Other Fresh Foods Available This Week
- 12.2.08 The Organic Revolution
- 12.2.08 Here's to your health
- 11.26.08 CNN: How the Rich Get Richer
- 11.25.08 CNN: Millionaire Loophole
- 11.14.08 EPA Advisers Seek Perchlorate Review
- 11.12.08 Pesticides Risky When Used in Combination, Watch Produce You Eat
- 11.10.08 Keep the Gifts Under the Tree Toxics-Free
- 11.7.08 Spending Your Organic Food Dollars Wisely
- 11.6.08 DuPont finds high levels of C8 in Chinese workers
- 11.6.08 Going Organic: Is It Worth the Cost?
- 10.31.08 Advisers: FDA decision on safety of BPA 'flawed'
- 10.31.08 FDA to Further Investigate BPA Compound
- 10.27.08 Pesticides Make Farmers Literally Depressed
- 10.13.08 Green Scene: Eco-tips help tip the scale in the Earth's favor
- 10.7.08 Water Tech: Groups to sue EPA over inaction on perchlorate cleanup
- 10.4.08 Best Organics for the Buck
- 10.3.08 Defense industry wins, people lose with perchlorate
- 10.3.08 Nurses Confer to Fight Hazardous Exposures
- 10.2.08 Peaches, Apples Have Highest Pesticide Loads in Group's Rankings
- 10.2.08 Top 12 Must-Buy Organic Foods
- 10.2.08 Nine ways to avoid household toxins
- 10.1.08 USDA Has Standards for Organic Foods
- 9.29.08 Congress Not Done With Farm Bill
- 9.28.08 Potion Has Sunny Forecast
- 9.26.08 Green Tip
- 9.24.08 Senate Cuts Would Shave $5 Million From S.D. EQIP Funds, Group Says
- 9.16.08 Ahead of the Bell: FDA meeting on bisphenol
- 9.12.08 Conservation Cuts in Spending Bills Grab Attention of Environmental Groups
- 9.12.08 Senate May Give Growers Less Than Vowed
- 9.12.08 Demand Already Exceeds Funding for Conservation Program That Could Suffer Cuts
- 9.12.08 Possible Cuts Draw Fire
- 9.11.08 Nurses Exposed to Toxic Cleaning Chemicals in Hospitals; Cancer Risk
- 9.11.08 Senate May Give Growers Less Than Vowed
- 9.11.08 Choose Antibacterial-Free Hand Soaps
- 9.11.08 Demand Already Exceeds Funding for Conservation Program That Could
- 9.9.08 Groups Oppose Cuts in U.S. Land Stewardship Programs
- 9.8.08 PBDE Liability: Get ready
- 9.6.08 Study: Neurotoxin In Everyday Household Items
- 9.4.08 Flame Retardant Detected In Children At Elevated Levels
- 9.4.08 Children May Be At More Risk of Exposure to Common, Suspect Chemical
- 9.4.08 Fire Retardant Chemicals Detected In Children’s Blood
- 9.4.08 Fire Retardants Found in Children's Blood
- 9.4.08 Keeping Flame Retardants Out Of Children's Blood
- 9.4.08 Flame Retardants Higher in Kids Than Adults
- 9.4.08 Fire Retardant Chemicals Found in Toddlers' Blood
- 9.4.08 Oakland Trib: Toddlers absorb more toxic chemicals than mothers
- 9.4.08 NBC 'Today': Toxic Fire Retardants in Toddlers' Blood
- 9.4.08 Reuters: Fire retardant chemical found in children
- 9.2.08 Reassurance Worrisome
- 9.1.08 Overwhelmed!
- 8.29.08 LIBRARY NOTES: Books a big help in 'going green’
- 8.29.08 Worried About Skin Cancer?
- 8.28.08 Are You Giving Your Child a Daily Dose of Toxins?
- 8.28.08 Is 'Organic' Worth It?
- 8.27.08 The Bare Essentials of Summer Skincare
- 8.24.08 Toxic & hazardous chemicals found in top selling scented laundry products and air fresheners
- 8.23.08 Going Organic Can Be Worth the Price
- 8.21.08 California Fails to Pass Chemical Ban in Baby Products
- 8.21.08 Eco-friendly Can Be Wallet-Friendly
- 8.15.08 FDA Criticized Over Sunscreen Regulation
- 8.14.08 The Going Gets Tough for Organic
- 8.13.08 Sun Protection Failures
- 8.11.08 Children's Sunscreens May Not Be Effective
- 8.10.08 Report: Elderly At Higher Risk From Hazards Found in Homes
- 8.8.08 Wondering About Mercury? Environment Working Group Offers Tuna Consumption Calculator and Much More
- 8.5.08 California Considers Banning PFOAs
- 8.5.08 Teflon Chemical Causes Cancer In Trout and Why I Care.
- 8.5.08 EPA and State of California Consider Ban on PFOA, Often Used in Nonstick Packaging
- 8.4.08 How to survive without eating peaches, peppers, lettuce ...
- 8.4.08 Sunscreen Labels Leave Consumers In The Dark
- 7.31.08 California to Ban Carcinogenic Food Packaging Chemical DuPont Claims is Safe
- 7.31.08 Sun Worshipers Beware
- 7.31.08 EPA-Holes
- 7.31.08 Sustainable Tuna's Brief Season: Get It Now
- 7.29.08 Bianca Knows Best ... And Prevents Cancer
- 7.28.08 Sustainable Fish That's Safe to Eat: Top Picks
- 7.27.08 How to: Avoid Sunburns
- 7.27.08 How to Be a Budget Organic
- 7.26.08 CAN HAZARDOUS WASTE BE SAFELY REMOVED FOR OUR BODIES?
- 7.25.08 Environmental Group Calls Triclosan a Ubiquitous Menace
- 7.25.08 Eating Green
- 7.24.08 What's Stressful Now? Sunscreen.
- 7.24.08 The Goods on Eco-Friendly Sunscreen
- 7.22.08 Is Your Sunscreen Working?
- 7.22.08 Flak and Tan
- 7.22.08 Study Finds Many Sunscreens Ineffective, Hazardous to Health
- 7.21.08 Who To Trust With Natural Sunscreen Recommendations?
- 7.21.08 Seattle PI: Pesticide Information: No problem here
- 7.19.08 The rub on sunscreens...
- 7.18.08 Pack a Safe, Effective Sunscreen
- 7.18.08 County Removes Pesticide Guide
- 7.18.08 How to dispose of old toxic cleaning supplies and personal care products
- 7.17.08 Pesticides Found In Soap, Toothpaste And Toys
- 7.17.08 Melanoma Rates Are Climbing -- Stay Safe
- 7.16.08 Which Produce Has the Most Pesticide?
- 7.15.08 Too Much Sun Gets Under Your Skin
- 7.15.08 Tiny Particles In Sunscreens Face Scrutiny
- 7.15.08 Summer Skin Care, Au Natural
- 7.15.08 Deciphering ABCs of SPF
- 7.14.08 How To Use Sunscreen Wisely
- 7.14.08 Tiny Bits of Zinc and Titanium Deemed Safe in Sunscreen
- 7.13.08 Sunscreen's Nanoparticles Seen As Safe
- 7.11.08 Strategic Shopping for Health
- 7.11.08 Is Your Sunsceen Providing Adequate Protection?
- 7.11.08 1000 Sunscreens Ranked - Check Yours. It May Be Hazardous to Your Health
- 7.10.08 Cancer Concerns
- 7.10.08 Strategic Shopping for Health
- 7.10.08 80% of Sunscreens Ineffective, New Study Says
- 7.10.08 SF Chron: 4 Out of 5 Sunscreens Inadequate, Study Finds
- 7.9.08 Report: Coppertone leads sunscreens not recommended
- 7.9.08 Why Sunscreen May Not Completely Protect You From Skin Cancer
- 7.8.08 Which Brand of Sunscreen Do You Use?
- 7.8.08 Sunscreen Worth The Money? Or Consumers Getting Burned?
- 7.8.08 WebMD: 8 Burning Questions About Sunscreens
- 7.8.08 Baltimore Sun: SPF Is Not Enough
- 7.7.08 The Five Best--And Worst--Sunscreens
- 7.7.08 Get the Chemistry Right with Your Beach Companion - Sunscreen
- 7.7.08 Study: Sunscreens Unreliable Or Harmful
- 7.7.08 Sunscreens "Blistered" By Nonprofit Study
- 7.7.08 EWG Names Safest Sunscreens
- 7.7.08 New Study Reveals the Best Sunscreens to Buy
- 7.7.08 Is Your Sunscreen As Safe As You Think?
- 7.7.08 Ineffective Sunscreens Increase The Risk Of Developing Skin Problems
- 7.7.08 Safer Sunscreens: Hot News and Product Picks
- 7.7.08 Boston Globe: Are Sunscreens Made With Parabens Safe?
- 7.7.08 Are You Using An Effective Sunscreen?
- 7.4.08 Sunscreen Safety, Perhaps Moot for Seattle
- 7.4.08 Most Sunscreens Fail To Protect Your Skin From Sun
- 7.4.08 NY Times: And Bring The Sunscreen
- 7.3.08 Summer Has Arrived — Finally.
- 7.3.08 Experts Say Most Top-Selling Sunscreen Not Effective
- 7.3.08 Protect Your Kids From the Sun
- 7.3.08 Protect Your Skin--and the Planet
- 7.3.08 Group Identified Top Sunscreen Brands
- 7.3.08 Is Your Sunblock Effective?
- 7.3.08 Sunscreen Weekend Ahead
- 7.3.08 Study Finds Sunscreens Fall Down On Job
- 7.2.08 Most Sunscreens Either Useless Or Unsafe
- 7.2.08 EWG Attacks Top Sunscreen Brands
- 7.2.08 Study: Many Sunscreen Products Offer Inadequate Protection
- 7.2.08 Is Your Sunscreen Protecting You From The Mile-High Rays?
- 7.2.08 Are You Protected?
- 7.2.08 Don’t Get Burned by Your Sunscreen
- 7.1.08 New Report Blasts Effectiveness Of Sunscreen
- 7.1.08 Most Sunscreens Aren't Effective According to New Report
- 7.1.08 Consumers Unaware Which Ones Offer Proper Protection
- 7.1.08 According To A New Study Sunscreens May Do More Harm Then Good
- 7.1.08 4 Out of 5 Sunscreens Don’t Work?
- 7.1.08 Is Your Sunscreen Really Working?
- 7.1.08 Sunscreen: Good for Your Skin, Bad for Reefs?
- 7.1.08 Safe and Eco-Friendly Hair Dyes For Pregnant Women
- 7.1.08 Report Shows 85% Of Suncreens Lack Proper Protection, May Be Unsafe
- 7.1.08 Most Sunscreen Products Aren't Adequate
- 7.1.08 A Skin-Deep Dilemma: Sunscreen
- 7.1.08 Consumers in the Dark Over Best Sunscreens
- 7.1.08 CNN: Some Sunscreens Overpromise On Protection
- 6.30.08 Natural Medicine: Reducing Pesticide Exposure
- 6.26.08 We’re On the Food Science Merry-Go-Round
- 6.25.08 Organic Trend Produces Confusion
- 6.24.08 Celery Adds Cool, Crisp Crunch To Summertime Dishes
- 6.24.08 Christian Science Monitor: Some Coastal Woes Begin Far Inland
- 6.23.08 Ethanol Rush May Be Doing More Harm Than Good
- 6.20.08 What’s in Your Ear?
- 6.20.08 Renewable Fuels Standard Under Fire
- 6.18.08 Groups Call on EPA to Back Off Renewable Fuels Standard
- 6.18.08 Poor Weather Could Tighten U.S. Corn Supply
- 6.18.08 Iowa Floods Raising Price of Corn
- 6.18.08 Ethanol Comes Under Fire for Rising Food Prices
- 6.18.08 National News: Food Prices to Rise 9 Percent a Year - Analyst
- 6.17.08 Economist: Grain Markets ‘Simply Ominous’
- 6.17.08 Record Flooding and Other Severe Weather Will Likely Send Food and Fuel Prices Even Higher This Summer.
- 6.17.08 Grassley: Allow Crops On Idled Acres
- 6.16.08 Stop! Don't Eat That Apple!
- 6.16.08 EWG: US Biofuels Policy Needs Rethinking After Current Weather
- 6.12.08 Congress Should Revisit Ethanol Mandate -- Poll
- 6.11.08 Look For Seal Marking Organic Food
- 6.10.08 Enviro Group Says C8 Substitutes Not Safe
- 6.10.08 Coalition Begins Effort To 'Restructure' Biofuels Policies
- 6.10.08 Congress Should Revisit Ethanol Mandate -- Poll
- 6.9.08 Brazil Seeing Sweet Profit From Sugar Cane-Based Ethanol
- 6.8.08 Saving Money On Organic Food
- 6.4.08 Newly Pregnant? Here's an 8-Step Crash Course in Going Green
- 6.3.08 Is Corn Boom Expanding Gulf of Mexico's 'Dead Zone'?
- 6.3.08 Picking Strawberries At The Farm
- 6.2.08 Napoleons Look Fancy, Taste Great
- 6.1.08 How Much Tuna Can You Eat Safely?
- 5.30.08 Food Prices to Rise 9 Percent a Year: Analyst
- 5.30.08 NY Times: Food Report Criticizes Biofuel Policies
- 5.30.08 No Cushion
- 5.29.08 Food Prices to Rise 9 Percent A Year
- 5.27.08 With Grocery Costs On the Rise, Can You Afford To Eat Healthy?
- 5.25.08 Grappling With Organic Produce and Goofy Fruit
- 5.22.08 Avoiding Pesticides: When To Eat Organic and When to Not Bother
- 5.19.08 Plan Ahead to Save Big Bucks
- 5.18.08 Manic For Organic
- 5.18.08 Where to Spend Your Green Money
- 5.18.08 A Careful Eye Keeps Organics Affordable
- 5.14.08 Screen Your Sun Protection For Safe Coverage
- 5.14.08 Chemical Used to Make Non-Stick Coatings Harmful to Health
- 5.12.08 Newsweek: Natural Response
- 5.10.08 Think That Your Gift Is Pesticide-Free? Give Organic Flowers and It Will Be
- 5.8.08 Inflation Bites: Tough Times Ahead For Whole Foods
- 5.8.08 What Organic Food Should I Buy?
- 5.6.08 Dangerous Teflon Not Worth Celebrating
- 5.3.08 Make A Green Statement With Your Next Bouquet
- 4.30.08 Organics For Beginners
- 4.29.08 Personal Care Products Often Far From Pure And Natural
- 4.25.08 Being Part-Time Organic
- 4.25.08 Switching Over To Pesticide-Free Food
- 4.24.08 Perchlorate Questions and Answers
- 4.23.08 Natural Selections Earth Dinners An Approachable Way To Talk About
- 4.23.08 Picking Produce: Online Guide Offers Tips on Shopping for Organics
- 4.22.08 Senator Offering Bill To Ban Widely Used Chemical Amid Rising Alerts
- 4.22.08 Consumers Pay Green To Go Green
- 4.18.08 Strategic Spending on Organic Foods
- 4.17.08 Go Green At Home and Protect the Family From Harmful Chemicals
- 4.9.08 Earth Day Dining
- 4.9.08 Earth Day Dining
- 4.4.08 Moral, Financial Puzzles Face Organics Shoppers
- 3.4.08 Cycling Nutrition: Organic Foods
- 3.4.08 Bill Would Ban ‘Teflon Chemicals’ In Food Packaging
- 3.1.08 Eating Green
- 2.25.08 Phthalates and Bisphenol A
- 2.18.08 Are Chemicals Altering The Planet?
- 2.15.08 Losing Another Winnable War: "Yes We Can" Conquer Childhood Cancer
- 2.15.08 Losing Another Winnable War: "Yes We Can" Conquer Childhood Cancer
- 2.14.08 BPA & Baby Bottles
- 2.7.08 The Health Dangers Of Reusing Plastic Bottles And Bags
- 2.4.08 Is toxic perchlorate in Utah's food?
- 2.4.08 Ready For My Close-Up: Adventures In Natural Cosmetics
- 1.31.08 WATER POLLUTION: Farm runoff in Nine States Linked to Gulf 'Dead Zone'
- 1.31.08 Des Moines Register: U.S. Study Says Iowa Among Main Gulf Polluters
- 1.29.08 The Beat
- 1.28.08 Newsweek: The Chemicals Within
- 1.28.08 "10 Americans": Presentation by EWG - Part 1
- 1.28.08 How Can You Tell If It's Really 'Green'?
- 1.28.08 "10 Americans": The Politics of Toxic Substances - Part 2
- 1.27.08 Can Beauty Be Dangerous?
- 1.27.08 Pesticide Free Produce
- 1.25.08 Become A Locavore
- 1.24.08 Organic Foods Can Be More Expensive
- 1.23.08 Organic Budget: Being Frugal Doesn't Mean You Have To Skimp On Healthy Food
- 1.22.08 Makeup Of Makeup
- 1.22.08 Congress Asks: Is Baby Formula In Safe Cans?
- 1.22.08 New Study May Bolster Activists’ Push To Broaden NIEHS BPA Assessment
- 1.18.08 BPA In Baby Formula Cans Under Investigation In Congress
- 1.15.08 Where Cancer-Causing Agents Lurk
- 1.8.08 Don’t Peel Those Apples
- 1.3.08 A New Measure Of Food Safety
- 1.3.08 Pucker Up: Industry Sees Rise In Organic Makeup
- 1.3.08 The 10 Most (and Least) Toxic Fruits and Vegetables
- 1.3.08 Do Aveda products live up to their reputation for purity?
- 12.31.07 This Year Resolve To Update Cosmetics To Eco-Friendly Brands
- 12.23.07 Peril In Plastic?
- 12.21.07 Health Hazards Add to Nursing Shortages
- 12.20.07 More Corn a Cause for Concern
- 12.17.07 U.S. Corn Boom Has Downside for Gulf
- 12.12.07 Is Your Child's Toothpaste Toxic?
- 12.12.07 Survey: Nurses Exposed to Toxic Substances
- 12.12.07 Workplace Chemicals a Danger to Nurses, Says Study
- 12.12.07 Nurses Exposed to Toxic Chemicals At Work
- 12.12.07 Group Warns That Nurses Face Health Risks from Chemical Exposure
- 12.11.07 Illness in Nurses Linked to Hazardous Materials on the Job
- 12.11.07 Nurses Survey Suggests Risk from Chemicals
- 12.11.07 Bishpenol-A Tainted Bottles, Containers Pulled by Canadian Retailer
- 12.11.07 Nurses’ Constant Exposure to Chemicals Linked to Diseases
- 12.11.07 Group Warns of Chemical Found in Cans of Baby Formula
- 12.11.07 Nurses Face Heightened Risks of Cancer, Miscarriages -- study
- 12.10.07 Chemical in Infant Formula Cans Sparks Concern
- 12.9.07 Investors Take Aim at Plastic Products
- 12.7.07 Children and Adults Exposed to Killer Chemicals
- 12.7.07 Canadian Retail Chain Pulls Plastic Water Bottles
- 12.6.07 Formula concerns arise
- 12.6.07 Study: Toxic Chemical Found In Most Baby Formula
- 11.29.07 Concerns Raised Over Fire-Retardant Chemicals In Homes
- 11.14.07 Toxic Toddler Toothpaste: Toxins in Kid Care Products
- 11.8.07 Children Exposed Daily to Personal Care Products With Chemicals Not Proven Safe
- 11.2.07 Health: Unsafe Products For Children
- 11.2.07 Study: Childrens' Products Deliver Toxic Chemicals
- 11.2.07 Baby Product Safety
- 11.2.07 Kids Safety
- 11.2.07 Study: Dangerous Chemicals In Common Baby Products
- 11.2.07 Safer Products for Kids
- 11.2.07 Group Warns Of Chemicals In Baby Products
- 11.2.07 Study: Childrens' Products Deliver Toxic Chemicals
- 11.1.07 Product Safety
- 11.1.07 Heatlh: Unsafe Products For Children
- 11.1.07 Study: Dangerous Chemicals In Common Baby Products
- 11.1.07 Environmental Working Group Analyzes Baby Products
- 10.16.07 Group's Suit Alleges Toxin In iPhones
- 10.11.07 Interest Group Claims Test Proves Safety Of Phthalates
- 10.8.07 Mercury Decision Doesn't End Dispute
- 10.5.07 How to React to a Recall
- 10.5.07 Pregnant And Nursing Women Should Eat More Fish But Within Limits, Say Nutritionists
- 10.5.07 All Of Sudden, Experts Say Fish Is Safe To Eat
- 10.4.07 Consumer Group Statement on Seafood and Health: 'We Told You So';
- 10.2.07 Living Green And Meaning It
- 9.28.07 Farmed Salmon, Pro and Con
- 9.27.07 Are Mercury-Containing Vaccines Safe For Children?
- 9.26.07 Just Peachy, Thanks
- 9.26.07 Organic Industry Seizes Opportunity
- 9.23.07 You Can Make a Difference, But Do Your Homework First
- 9.20.07 Programs May Hurt Grasslands
- 9.19.07 Safety, Price Govern Choice of Farmed or Wild
- 9.17.07 This is why surfactants are not our friends
- 9.17.07 Daily wellness tip: When to buy organic
- 9.17.07 St. Louis Post Dispatch: Biofuel Industry Revs Up Firepower
- 9.16.07 Study Finds Farm Runoff Feeds Dead Zone in Gulf of Mexico
- 9.16.07 Industry Defending Biofuels as Critics Attack Higher Costs
- 9.16.07 Meat, Dairy and Other Food Producers Assail Ethanol
- 9.14.07 Industry Waging Defense of Biofuels
- 9.12.07 Gannett News Service - Study: Farm Runoff Feeds Dead Zone
- 9.11.07 Des Moines Resgister: Groups: Ask More Of Farmers On Runoff
- 9.11.07 Nanorod Technology Enhances Titanium Oxide Sunscreen
- 9.11.07 Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: Farmland Erosion Expands Dead Zone
- 9.11.07 Reuters: U.S. Farmers Should Curb Fertilizer Runoff: Study
- 9.7.07 Brown Bagging Goes Green
- 9.4.07 Water, Water Everywhere
- 9.2.07 Reports About Plastic Contaminants Raise Parents' Concerns
- 8.31.07 The FDA Proposes a Four-Star Rating System for Sunscreens; What Took it so Long?
- 8.30.07 State Working on Perchlorate Limit
- 8.29.07 Ask the Trainer: What's the Big Deal About Organic Food?
- 8.28.07 Our chemical dilemma
- 8.26.07 Water wars: Bottled vs tap
- 8.24.07 FDA proposes new rules for sunscreens
- 8.24.07 U.S. FDA proposes sunscreen rule, cancer warning
- 8.24.07 FDA to start testing sunscreens and grading them from 1 to 4 stars
- 8.24.07 Stricter sunscreen labeling sought
- 8.24.07 FDA seeks more detailed sunscreen labels
- 8.24.07 Jury Still Out on BPA/Plastics Risk
- 8.23.07 Getting Burned
- 8.23.07 FDA Proposes New Rules for Sunscreens
- 8.23.07 Federal environmental health agency's actions to be reviewed
- 8.23.07 FDA Wants Cancer Warning and UVA Protection Rating on Sunscreen Labels
- 8.23.07 FDA Proposes Sunscreen Rule, Cancer Warning
- 8.23.07 Sunscreens Would Display UVA Rating Under U.S. Plan
- 8.22.07 Good Eats
- 8.21.07 Tap water: Now with Fluoride
- 8.21.07 Group: Fluoride in Metropolitan Water District Puts Kids at Risk
- 8.21.07 Flouride plan could expose tens of thousands of children to unsafe doses
- 8.20.07 Studies Highlight Hazards of Manicurists’ Chemicals
- 8.16.07 Bottled Water Subject To Fewer Standards Than Municipal Tap Water
- 8.16.07 Are You Addicted To The Sun?
- 8.16.07 Flame Retardants Blamed For Cat Thyroid Disease
- 8.14.07 Nanoparticles In Your Sunscreen: Too Hot To Handle?
- 8.14.07 Sunny Daze
- 8.14.07 Pesticides In The Plantations
- 8.13.07 On The Other Hand
- 8.13.07 Can Sunscreen Lead To Hormone Damage In Kids?
- 8.11.07 A Green Home Is Good Enough To Eat
- 8.11.07 Bottled Water Costs More, For Us And The Environment
- 8.11.07 Coated Pots And Pans Can Present Health Hazards
- 8.10.07 NIH Panel Releases Conclusions About Compound BPA's Effect On Reproductive Disorders
- 8.10.07 Always Wear Sunscreen? Maybe Not
- 8.9.07 Some Risk Linked To Plastic Chemical
- 8.9.07 Dermatologist At UMDNJ Offers Home Remedies And Advice For Sunburn Relief
- 8.9.07 Federal Panel Sees Little Risk To Bisphenol-A
- 8.9.07 End Fluoridation, say 500 Physicians, Dentists, Scientists and Environmentalists
- 8.9.07 Is Your Sunscreen Doing You More Harm Than Good?
- 8.9.07 How To Pick A Peach
- 8.9.07 Science Panel Releases Final Report On Plastics' Chemical
- 8.9.07 Is This Bottle A Hazard To Your Health? One Review Of Chemical Warns Of Huge Risks; Another Says Nothing To Worry About
- 8.9.07 Panel: Chemical In Plastics Isn't A Threat To Most
- 8.9.07 Plastic Chemical Safety Weighed
- 8.9.07 Do Sunscreens Have You Covered?
- 8.9.07 Produce Treated With Pesticides Not Limited To Grocery Stores
- 8.8.07 Sunscreen: Don't Get Burned
- 8.8.07 Listify Me
- 8.8.07 Are Americans Getting Burned By Sunscreen?
- 8.8.07 USDA Agency Launches Inquiry Into Lobbying E-mail
- 8.7.07 Sunscreen Labels
- 8.7.07 Federal Toxicity Study Favors Chemical Industry: Critics
- 8.7.07 Report On Chemical's Safety Called Biased
- 8.7.07 Organic Food
- 8.6.07 Kick The Can
- 8.2.07 Best Sunscreens Study: Most Ineffective Or Dangerous, But UV Natural Is Safest, Most Effective
- 8.2.07 Hidden Hazards #5: Baby Shampoo & Body Wash
- 8.2.07 Is Your Sunscreen More Dangerous Than The Sun?
- 8.1.07 This Month On The Internets: Meet The Greens And The ‘Screens’
- 7.31.07 Audit Of Controversial Chemical Report Shows No Impropriety
- 7.31.07 Sunscreen Fact Check
- 7.31.07 Is Organic Food Better?
- 7.30.07 Exactly What Protection Do Sunscreen Products Provide?
- 7.29.07 Should You Chuck Your Teflon Cookware?
- 7.29.07 Sunscreen: Learn Not To Burn
- 7.27.07 Cosmetics Safety Concerns
- 7.27.07 Treehugger Radio On Sunscreens
- 7.27.07 Turning Your Body Green
- 7.25.07 Protect Your Health In The Sun Worship Temple
- 7.25.07 Sun Safety Gets User-Friendly With New Regulations
- 7.24.07 Toxics Found in Tap Water at U.S. Capitol, EPA
- 7.23.07 Toxin Problem Less Severe For Taps On Hill
- 7.22.07 Tap Water or Bottled Water?
- 7.22.07 Bibb's battle; Dermatologist puts energy, curiosity in cancer research
- 7.22.07 Week In Review July 15-21
- 7.20.07 Safety Concerns
- 7.20.07 Water Safety Concerns
- 7.20.07 Skin Savers: The Latest In Skin Protection
- 7.20.07 D.C. Officials Say Tap Water Is Safe
- 7.20.07 Study: Unsafe Toxin Level in DC Water
- 7.19.07 How Safe is Region's Drinking Water?
- 7.19.07 Group Raises New Concerns Over DC Tap Water
- 7.19.07 Water Worries
- 7.19.07 New Fears Raised Over Safety of D.C. Water
- 7.19.07 Baby Shampoos? Dangerous?
- 7.19.07 Innocuous Acts That Can Pollute
- 7.19.07 Everybody’s Free (To Wear Sunscreen)
- 7.19.07 New Fears Raised Over D.C. Water
- 7.19.07 Group Finds Chlorine Toxins In D.C. Water
- 7.19.07 Dc Is Drinking Pool Water
- 7.19.07 MLK Doesn’t Need This!
- 7.19.07 Survey: What's In Baby's Bottle?
- 7.19.07 Morning Roundup: Water Worries Edition
- 7.19.07 Consumer Alert: Some Sunscreens May Be Dangerous
- 7.19.07 Toxins In DC Water
- 7.18.07 Call To Regulate UVA Protection In US Sunscreen Formulation
- 7.18.07 Secondhand Pill
- 7.18.07 Go Read It Today, Wednesday, July 18, 2007
- 7.18.07 Q&A: Strangest Allergy Question Ever
- 7.18.07 Quivering Moles
- 7.18.07 Sunscreen Questions
- 7.18.07 Chemicals From Personal Care Products, Including Perfume, Polluting SF Bay
- 7.18.07 EWG Report On Chemicals In San Francisco Bay
- 7.18.07 Is This Glop Safe To Put On My Face?
- 7.17.07 Chemicals in Common Products Polluting San Francisco Bay
- 7.17.07 Are Most Sunscreens Really that Helpful?
- 7.17.07 Into The Mouths Of Babes
- 7.17.07 Some Sunscreens Ineffective
- 7.16.07 Chicago Tribune, Contra Costa Times: Sunscreens Don’t block, Aren’t Waterproof, And Nobody’s Checking Their SPF Claims Either…
- 7.16.07 Is Sunscreen A Smokescreen?
- 7.16.07 Don't Get Burned
- 7.16.07 Buy Organic Without Breaking the Bank
- 7.16.07 Sunscreen Saftey & Effectiveness
- 7.16.07 Sifting Through Sunscreens
- 7.14.07 Be Careful Out There
- 7.14.07 Screen Out The Cancer-Causing UV Rays; Using Sunblock Now On Small Fry Could Cut Melanoma Rate In 2060
- 7.12.07 Treated sewage still contaminated
- 7.11.07 Report: Harmful household chemicals dumped into San Francisco Bay
- 7.11.07 How Well Do Sunscreens Protect You? July 9th 2007
- 7.11.07 Sunscreen Safe?
- 7.11.07 Danger Feared from Chemicals Getting into Bay
- 7.11.07 Options Are Growing For Organic Consumers
- 7.11.07 Shine A Light On Sunscreen Safety
- 7.10.07 The new food crusade
- 7.9.07 Study finds sunscreens may not live up to name
- 7.5.07 Screening Sunscreen
- 7.5.07 Do Sunscreens Have You Covered?
- 7.5.07 Sunscreen: Use It Everyday
- 7.5.07 Most Sunscreens Aren't Up to the Task
- 7.3.07 A 'Best' And 'Worst' List
- 7.2.07 Living Well: Use Unsafe Sunscreen Products And You May Get Burned
- 6.29.07 Government Studies Of Chemicals In The Body Ignore Pesticides Found Most Frequently In Foods
- 6.29.07 A Peach By Any Other Name
- 6.28.07 The Dark Side Of Sunscreen Chemicals
- 6.28.07 Produce: Should You Buy Organic?
- 6.27.07 About That Organic Broccoli From China
- 6.27.07 The Weekly Pick--The Grow Organics Petition
- 6.27.07 Food And Farm Bill Notes
- 6.26.07 On Your Face: Sunscreens Lack Punch
- 6.26.07 Best Blocks For The Buck
- 6.26.07 Frugal Shopping: Which Vegetables Should You Buy Organic?
- 6.26.07 How Does Your Sunscreen Stack Up?
- 6.26.07 Organic Call To Action On Farm Bill
- 6.26.07 Not Everything Has To Be Organic
- 6.25.07 I’m Going To Go Throw Up Now
- 6.25.07 Consumer Group Blasts U.S. Sunscreens
- 6.25.07 24 Hours
- 6.25.07 Summer Knowledge: What's in That Sunscreen?
- 6.24.07 Protect Your Skin This Summer -- Sunscreen Database
- 6.24.07 How Safe is Your Sunscreen?
- 6.22.07 Safely Sunscreened: A Good Guide For Summer Sunscreens
- 6.22.07 Report Gives Many Popular Sunscreens Low Ratings
- 6.22.07 Your Carefully Applied Sunscreen? It May Not Work (At All)
- 6.22.07 Choose Your Sunscreen Wisely: Tips for Summer
- 6.22.07 Buyer Beware Of Sunscreen
- 6.21.07 Sunscreens - You must read this
- 6.21.07 Burning Issue
- 6.21.07 Best, worst sunscreens
- 6.21.07 Report Claims Many Sunscreens Don't Work
- 6.21.07 Are You Getting Burned By Your Sunscreen?
- 6.21.07 Study Says Most Sunscreens Don’t Protect Well Enough
- 6.21.07 Sunscreen Users Could Get Burned, Assert Critics
- 6.20.07 New Sunscreen Study
- 6.20.07 Sunscreen Safety
- 6.20.07 Does Your Sunscreen Really Work?: Online Database Rates Sunscreen Safety And Effectiveness
- 6.20.07 A Look At The New Suncreen Database From The Environmental Working Group And Thoughts About the Cosmetic Implications
- 6.20.07 New Database Tells Which Sunscreens Are Safe And Effective
- 6.20.07 Sunscreen Warnings
- 6.20.07 Is Your Sunscreen Doing The Job?
- 6.20.07 Sunscreen - What Works, What’s Safe
- 6.20.07 Health Highlights: June 20, 2007
- 6.20.07 Sunscreen Study
- 6.20.07 Sunscreen: Facts On What Products Are Most Effective
- 6.20.07 Does Your Sunscreen Really Protect You?
- 6.20.07 EWG Exposes Effectiveness And Safety Of Sunscreen Brands
- 6.20.07 Are You Getting Enough Protection From Your Sunscreen?
- 6.20.07 Reports Indicate that Most Sunscreens Fail Safety Test.
- 6.20.07 Pun In The Sun
- 6.20.07 Health Group Finds A Majority Of Sunscreens Not Effective
- 6.19.07 Sunscreen Ratings
- 6.19.07 Sunscreen Safety & Effectiveness
- 6.19.07 Sunscreen Ratings
- 6.19.07 Sunscreen Safety & Effectiveness
- 6.19.07 New Web Site Rates Hundreds Of Sunscreens
- 6.19.07 ABC 7 Medical: Sunscreen Report
- 6.19.07 Sunscreen And SPF: Shining A Light On Effectiveness Of Sunscreens
- 6.19.07 Online Database Rates Sunscreen Effectiveness And Safety
- 6.19.07 Burned By Suntan Lotion?
- 6.19.07 Is Your Sunscreen Working?
- 6.19.07 Health Wrap: Sunscreen, Breast Cancer & Calcium
- 6.19.07 Study: Some Sunscreens May Not Protect
- 6.19.07 New Study: How Safe Is Wearing Sunscreen?
- 6.19.07 Study: Many Suncreens Provide Poor Protection
- 6.19.07 Is Your Sunscreen Safe? Group Throws Unflattering Light On Some Products
- 6.19.07 Sunscreens In Unflattering Light
- 6.18.07 Natural chic Part 2: Makeup and Beauty Treats
- 6.18.07 Whole Foods Help Consumers Find the Right Skin Care Product
- 6.17.07 Burt's Bees Creates Buzz On 'Natural' Cosmetics
- 6.17.07 Eating Organic Doesn't Have To Bust Budget
- 6.11.07 Retailer takes initiative on skin care ingredients
- 6.8.07 Too Much Rocket Fuel in Boston Breast Milk
- 6.6.07 Safety and Dangers of SkinCare Products
- 6.6.07 Dangers and Safety of Skincare Products
- 6.6.07 Unnatural Beauty: Burt's Bees Generates Cosmetics Buzz
- 6.5.07 Learning to change a lifestyle
- 6.4.07 Rivers of Doubt
- 6.3.07 Cosmetics Safety Under Fire
- 6.1.07 Safe and unsafe cosmetics
- 5.30.07 Burt's out to define 'natural' cosmetics
- 5.29.07 Bausch Lomb ReNu MultiPlus vs Clear Care Contact Lens Solution
- 5.29.07 Safetyguide to Cosmetics
- 5.28.07 Making Skin Deep obsolete
- 5.28.07 Safety of cosmetics is a gray area
- 5.26.07 Passion for Green, Clean & Everything In Between
- 5.24.07 Grenn Myth-Busting: "Natural" Beauty Products
- 5.23.07 Asbestos board in question
- 5.22.07 New drive aims to define 'natural' cosmetics
- 5.22.07 Environmental Working Group Expands Skin Deep Database
- 5.21.07 Does hair relaxer cause breast cancer in black women?
- 5.21.07 Environmental Working Group Skin Deep Cosmetic Safety Database
- 5.18.07 Skin Deep Goes Deeper
- 5.18.07 Skin Care Products: Which ones are toxic? Find out.
- 5.18.07 Poison Makeup Alert - For Every Woman in Your Life
- 5.17.07 More Than Skin Deep
- 5.17.07 New Study Strengthens Chromium-Cancer Link
- 5.17.07 Natural Baby, Poisonous World
- 5.16.07 Skin Deep gets prettier
- 5.16.07 Chromium in drinking water causes cancer: U.S. agencyJill Serjeant
- 5.16.07 What Is a 'Natural' Cosmetic?
- 5.16.07 What most people don't know about toxic chemicals in cosmetics: It's not pretty
- 5.15.07 EWG is the Deep Throat of the Personal Care Industry with its Launch of Skin Deep 3.0
- 5.15.07 Jet Fuel Additive May Be In Food Supply
- 5.14.07 White House, Congress at Odds Over EPA Rules
- 5.13.07 Former celebrity stylist wins converts to Isvara Organics
- 5.10.07 Scotchgard
- 5.9.07 Pollutants common in U.S. potable water
- 5.7.07 Perchlorate debate is heating up
- 5.5.07 Bisphenol A warning bells
- 5.1.07 Does this ubiquitous chemical put our daughters at risk?
- 5.1.07 Perfluoroalkyl Acids: What Is the Evidence Telling Us?
- 4.30.07 Beauty and the Beasts
- 4.28.07 Tainted Food Supply?
- 4.25.07 Amazing popovers are versatile pastry
- 4.22.07 Questions raised about bisphenol-a
- 4.22.07 The Bisphenol-A Dilemma
- 4.22.07 Bisphenol A for dinner -- again?
- 4.22.07 Fireproofing chemical may face backlash after phase-out
- 4.21.07 Be an Earth angel
- 4.20.07 Eating fish: There's a catch
- 4.18.07 How tainted is the water we drink?
- 4.18.07 NIH Fires Contractor
- 4.17.07 California Moves to Reinstate Reporting Standards Weakened by Federal EPA
- 4.17.07 NIH Will Review Contractor's Work On Chemical's Risk
- 4.17.07 NIH Sacks Contractor Due to Conflict of Interest
- 4.17.07 U.S. fires firm over apparent conflict
- 4.17.07 Conflict Of Interest
- 4.15.07 Heinz Kerry just quieter, not silent
- 4.14.07 Researchers: EPA Helping To Hide Tons Of Toxic Waste
- 4.14.07 NIH Drops Contractor For Conflict of Interest
- 4.14.07 Cancer and cosmetics
- 4.13.07 Scrutinizing the safety of cosmetics ingredients
- 4.12.07 EPA Helping to Hide Tons of Toxic Waste, Researchers Show
- 4.11.07 New Jersey dives into PFOA water guidance
- 4.10.07 NIH Suspends Contractor Because Of Concerns About Conflicts
- 4.10.07 Your Health: Another Cosmetic Warning
- 4.10.07 Toxic releases in your neighborhood
- 4.9.07 Glass baby bottles making comeback
- 4.8.07 WA Senate Passes Bill Phasing Out Fire Retardants in Certain Products
- 4.7.07 'Inherently toxic' chemical faces its future;
- 4.5.07 Tests find harmful chemical leaching into canned food
- 4.4.07 Message on a Bottle
- 4.3.07 WA Senate OKs bill phasing out fire retardants in some products
- 4.3.07 PBDE ban approved in Washington -- first in nation
- 3.29.07 The Aging Face
- 3.28.07 More than meets the eye
- 3.24.07 Firm's ties under scrutiny
- 3.23.07 ShopSmart warns about chemicals in cosmetics
- 3.23.07 Green Tea for the Skin
- 3.22.07 Grassroots organization POWA launches campaign to outlaw fluoridation
- 3.21.07 Naturally Rockford: Four tips for finding safe, organic alternatives to
- 3.19.07 Can you tell from the labels whether cosmetics contain ingredients that may be harmful?
- 3.14.07 EWG Going to Task for Us Again
- 3.13.07 Bisphenol A found in food
- 3.11.07 Flawed oversight on chemicals' safety
- 3.10.07 Privatizing Science Jeopardizes Reproductive Health
- 3.9.07 Do They Care If People Die?
- 3.9.07 A Chemical Conflict of Interest?
- 3.8.07 Roundup: The decline and fall of the slimeheads; break out the waders; and are those green beans killing you?
- 3.8.07 Cancer chemical found at high levels in baby food, tinned goods
- 3.8.07 No verdict yet on safety of chemical in plastics
- 3.8.07 Industry Sway on Government Decisions Assailed
- 3.7.07 Scientific Consultant Sparks Controversy over Conflicts of Interest
- 3.7.07 Controversial chemical found in canned foods, U.S. tests show
- 3.7.07 Battle Over Bisphenol
- 3.7.07 Chemical agency ties under review
- 3.7.07 Sparking healthy debate
- 3.6.07 The Knights Who Say NIH
- 3.6.07 Trouble at another NIH institute
- 3.6.07 Study: Canned food has toxic chemical
- 3.5.07 The Hazards of Privatizing Federal Science
- 3.5.07 Little hope for clarity on plastics
- 3.4.07 Public health agency linked to chemical industry
- 3.2.07 Firm with Suspect Ties Monitors Chemical Industry for Govt.
- 2.26.07 Dioxane found in baby products
- 2.23.07 Baby Steps Toward Beauty Product Safety Regulation
- 2.21.07 There's A Carcinogen in Your Baby's Shampoo
- 2.21.07 Dive deep, find the main meaning of drinking water report
- 2.21.07 Report suggest weak US cosmetic regulation could hit investment
- 2.20.07 Company will test your water, but city official says don't bother
- 2.19.07 Safe suds at bath time
- 2.19.07 Help! There's an Industrial Solvent in my Shampoo
- 2.16.07 When pregnant mom eats fish, kids do better: study
- 2.11.07 Fragrant secrets
- 2.11.07 How safe is your water?
- 2.8.07 Some children's bath products hazardous, groups say
- 2.7.07 DuPont to eliminate PFOA packaging chemical by 2015
- 2.6.07 Hills considers citywide water system franchise
- 2.6.07 DuPont promises to end PFOA use by 2015
- 2.5.07 DuPont sets goal of eliminating Teflon processing chemical
- 2.4.07 Perchlorate levels stump researchers
- 1.26.07 Chemicals in Cosmetics
- 1.25.07 Denenberg: Some Ingredients To Avoid And Some Rules For Action When Using Cosmetics
- 1.16.07 Flame retardant ban may not reach Texas this year
- 1.12.07 Dangers of looking good
- 1.12.07 Now shrimp comes under scrutiny
- 1.12.07 Peaches Top 'Dirty Dozen' of Pesticide-prone Fruits
- 1.9.07 EPA Rejects Carcinogenic Wood Preservative for Home Use
- 1.9.07 Environmentalists Pressuring California on Perchlorate Risks
- 1.9.07 EPA rejects wood preservative for playgrounds, decks
- 1.8.07 EPA Rejects Proposed Lumber Treatment
- 1.7.07 Time to lift the mask on the great cover-up
- 1.5.07 Chemical Controversy
- 1.4.07 Toxic Teflon: Compounds from Household Products Found in Human Blood
- 12.31.06 State may be amiss about perchlorate
- 12.28.06 Making Green Choices
- 12.22.06 Chromium paper retracted unfairly, author says
- 12.18.06 Lottery in a Make-up Bag
- 12.17.06 From Processed Foods to Natural Wholesomeness
- 12.7.06 A Chrome-Plated Controversy
- 12.4.06 Nail salons' workers, clients at risk from toxic chemicals
- 12.4.06 Toxic Trade-Off
- 12.4.06 Group claims 'tobacco'-style lobby shields toxic interests
- 12.1.06 I-Team: Milk Menace
- 11.25.06 Toxic levels in water still high
- 11.9.06 Pretty sans parabens
- 11.1.06 Fishy reports
- 11.1.06 Rocket Fuel's Widespread,Toxic Fallout
- 10.31.06 PERCHLORATE: Enviros press Calif. to adopt strictest water limits
- 10.30.06 Environment agency invites nanotechnology talks
- 10.30.06 Critics demand cleaner water
- 10.30.06 State urged to adopt tougher perchlorate standard in water
- 10.27.06 New alert on eating salmon
- 10.26.06 The Breast Views Blog: Halloween Safety
- 10.26.06 MDEQ whitewashed PFOA, protects polluter profits
- 10.26.06 Study Reveals Produce With Most Pesticides
- 10.18.06 Teflon chemical safe, DuPont report says
- 10.18.06 One Study Calls Fish a Lifesaver, Another Is More Cautious
- 10.18.06 DuPont Says Study Shows Teflon Chemical Isn't Deadly (Update1)
- 10.17.06 DuPont to Study Chemical's Health Impact
- 10.14.06 Teflon Is Great for Politicians, but Is It Safe for Regular People?
- 10.10.06 Chemical company DuPont to focus on green technology, sustainable resources
- 10.8.06 Chemical found in food could harm women's thyroid
- 10.6.06 Feds Find Rocket-fuel Chem More Dangerous Than Reported
- 10.6.06 CDC Connects Perchlorate with Thyroid Problems in Women
- 10.6.06 Rocket fuel ingredient may affect thyroid
- 10.5.06 CDC Study Shows Exposure to Rocket Fuel Ingredient Has Impact on Hormone Levels
- 10.5.06 A Tale of Teflon
- 10.5.06 Perchlorate thyroid risk for women found
- 10.5.06 Perchlorate Linked to Thyroid Deficiency in Women
- 10.5.06 More toxin risks found with perchlorate
- 10.5.06 Study looks at perchlorate
- 10.1.06 Good catches: concerned about fish contamination? Here's how to enjoy this
- 10.1.06 States Approach Deadline for New Mercury Standards
- 10.1.06 States Approach Deadline for New Mercury Standards
- 9.27.06 Teflon issue
- 9.19.06 With Water in Mind
- 9.14.06 Red light PFOA now
- 9.13.06 Water, water pollutants everywhere
- 9.13.06 DEQ still to set PFOA hearing
- 9.12.06 Water | The good, the bad, the filtered
- 9.11.06 Calif. eyes perchlorate rule
- 8.29.06 State Proposes Limit for Perchlorate in Drinking Water
- 8.29.06 Calif. proposes new standard for perchlorate in drinking water
- 8.25.06 The Dead Zone
- 8.20.06 PFOA release needs more study
- 8.16.06 We should pay attention to the canary in the kitchen
- 8.9.06 Commercial chemicals' safety unknown
- 8.2.06 Toxicologist should be censured, says group
- 7.24.06 3M still studying contaminated fields
- 7.23.06 How pure is bottled water?
- 7.18.06 Cosmetics makers under fire on nail polish chemicals
- 7.17.06 The Healthy Home: Kitchens And Bathrooms
- 7.13.06 Build a better brain: New book tells how to nourish your grey matter
- 6.28.06 Plenty of Drops to Drink
- 6.26.06 Q & A Today's Mailbag
- 6.26.06 Time to help the 'dead zone'
- 6.23.06 Online Journal Will Have Low Rejection Rate; Medical Journal Will Retract Paper Over Conflict
- 6.20.06 Report highlights reasons
- 6.13.06 Farewell to Teflon
- 6.7.06 Journal retracts chromium study
- 6.7.06 Peer-Reviewed Journal Will Retract Controversial Paper on Chromium Pollution
- 6.7.06 In Search of a Pan That Lets Cooks Forget About Teflon
- 6.6.06 New warning for canned tuna
- 6.3.06 Retraction of study on chemical, cancer
- 6.3.06 Journal adds fuel to growing fears of chromium risk
- 6.2.06 Publication to Retract an Influential Water Study
- 6.2.06 Medical journal to retract water article
- 6.2.06 EPA stands firm on C8 stance
- 5.31.06 USW backs suit against DuPont over chemical
- 5.29.06 To non-stick, say 'non, merci', group urges
- 5.29.06 'Staying power' chemical poses health risks
- 5.29.06 Coming to terms with perils of non-stick products
- 5.26.06 Writers ask about makeup, bird flu
- 5.15.06 The gift our mothers never wanted to give
- 5.11.06 DuPont confident lawsuit on the dangers of Teflon won't stick
- 5.9.06 Popcorn Bags
- 5.5.06 First shot in the 2007 farm bill debate?
- 5.5.06 More than half of US streams polluted: EPA
- 5.1.06 Keep Your Cool When Using Teflon
- 4.28.06 3M fined for chemical used in Decatur
- 4.25.06 Burnt Offgassings: Tales of Teflon
- 4.25.06 Protest set for Wilmington, Del. DuPont meeting
- 4.21.06 Teflon debate a sticky situation
- 4.20.06 Lawsuit against DuPont alleges it failed to warn of the dangers of cooking with Teflon-coated pots and pans
- 4.19.06 DuPont Under Fire for Teflon Fumes
- 4.19.06 Iowa Lawsuit To Test Teflon
- 4.18.06 The 'Dead Zone': You're Paying for It in More Ways Than One
- 4.17.06 Dead zone linked to farm subsidies
- 4.12.06 Farm Subsidies Lead to Ocean Pollution, Researchers Say
- 4.11.06 Report: Fertilizer is killing Gulf fish
- 4.11.06 Gulf dead zone traced to limited sources
- 4.10.06 Small percentage of rural counties contribute to fertilizer pollution
- 4.10.06 New EWG Analysis Says Nitrogen Pollution a Fixable Problem
- 4.3.06 Teflon lawsuit turns nation's eye to D.M.
- 3.28.06 Food scares
- 3.27.06 Notices leave residents wondering: What are we drinking?
- 3.24.06 Medicines and the Environment: Legal and Regulatory Stormss Ahead
- 3.22.06 Diet Detective
- 3.21.06 Safety concerns adhere to nonstick chemicals
- 3.19.06 Another polluter not needed
- 3.16.06 Chemical warrants warnings on products
- 3.15.06 State targets contaminant
- 3.12.06 Invisible Danger? Parents Look Inside the Lunchbox
- 3.9.06 EPA admits C8 may be unsafe for humans
- 3.5.06 Environmental Working Group Highly Critical of White House Delay in Releasing Study Finding Toxic Rocket Fuel Chemical
- 2.28.06 Nonstick pans caught up in a sticky controversy
- 2.27.06 Scientist issues PFC report
- 2.27.06 Industry Study Withheld Data on Carcinogen: Report
- 2.25.06 Industrial chemical found in fish near Cottage Grove
- 2.22.06 Too Hot to Handle?
- 2.22.06 Groups seek warning Prop. 65 label for non-stick products
- 2.22.06 The Weinberg proposal
- 2.22.06 Steelworkers lead Teflon chemical warnings
- 2.20.06 Study Says No Health Problems From Perchlorate
- 2.16.06 Board: Teflon Chemical a Likely Carcinogen
- 2.16.06 Panel links 3M chemical to cancer
- 2.15.06 Eating Well
- 2.14.06 Safety Concerns May Stick to Teflon
- 2.14.06 Harvard Professor: Hiding a Link?
- 2.12.06 Chemical fear sticks to more than just Teflon
- 2.9.06 Utah to begin perchlorate sampling after tainted milk discovered
- 2.9.06 Teflon issue
- 2.8.06 Is there life after teflon?
- 2.8.06 As Teflon Troubles Pile Up, DuPont Responds With Ads
- 2.7.06 PG&E critic Erin Brockovich doubtful about legal settlement
- 2.4.06 After PCBs, the next big thing
- 2.4.06 Del. plant releases C8-type chemicals
- 2.3.06 Nonstick chemicals raise sticky questions
- 2.2.06 Cancer-threat chemical can be controlled, researcher says
- 2.1.06 Science that sticks: Chemist's work behind U.S. decision to ban chemical
- 1.31.06 C8 a likely cancer risk, federal report says
- 1.31.06 Review panel: Teflon chemical a likely carcinogen
- 1.27.06 Are Teflon Pans Safe?
- 1.27.06 DuPont plant will work to contain chemical
- 1.27.06 FDA tests show risk in tuna
- 1.27.06 EPA can end the back-and-forth of this region
- 1.27.06 EPA Urges Teflon Chemical Ban
- 1.27.06 Teflon under fire for toxicity
- 1.27.06 PFOA
- 1.26.06 Medical Report on Teflon
- 1.26.06 Teflon Worries
- 1.26.06 EPA Warning on Teflon Agreement
- 1.26.06 A Closer Look: Teflon Safety
- 1.26.06 EPA tries to curb use of Teflon chemical
- 1.26.06 Harmful Teflon Chemical To Be Eliminated by 2015
- 1.26.06 DuPont to phase out Teflon byproduct
- 1.26.06 Teflon Dangers?
- 1.26.06 EPA Calls for End to Releases of Chemical in Teflon Process
- 1.26.06 A Closer Look: Teflon Safety
- 1.26.06 E.P.A. Seeks to Phase Out a Toxic Chemical
- 1.26.06 C8 levels to drop under voluntary EPA program
- 1.26.06 Teflon Dangers?
- 1.26.06 Teflon chemical on EPA hit list
- 1.26.06 DuPont to Try to Reduce Chemical in Teflon
- 1.26.06 The End of Teflon
- 1.26.06 First on CNBC: Investigating Teflon
- 1.26.06 US asks co's to slash output of Teflon compound
- 1.26.06 Could its decisive moves on PFOA mean DuPont really has a heart?
- 1.25.06 Government moves to curb use of chemical in Teflon
- 1.25.06 EPA Program Could Eliminate Teflon Chemical
- 1.25.06 DuPont Agrees to Reduce Use of Teflon Chemical
- 1.25.06 EPA acts to curtail potential carcinogen
- 1.25.06 U.S. EPA Seeks Elimination of Teflon Chemical by 2015
- 1.25.06 Testing detects wider reach
- 1.24.06 You can make good water better
- 1.23.06 Shades of Brockovich glimpsed here in L.A.
- 1.21.06 Las Vegas tap water is hopelessly contaminated with legal chemicals!
- 1.19.06 What is a consumer to do?
- 1.18.06 EPA urged to monitor DuPont N.C. Plant
- 1.18.06 North Carolina residents petition for expanded C8 investigation
- 1.17.06 Mercury in Fish? Baloney!
- 1.16.06 Environmental Working Group puts LANL contractor's record into focus
- 1.13.06 DuPont Teflon chemical C8 found in Ohio stream, bottled water
- 1.10.06 Could Teflon Be Harming Your Health?
- 1.10.06 Consultant's Credibility Doubted; Group Tracks LANL Emissions
- 1.10.06 Environmental group wants consultant removed from job
- 1.6.06 DuPont in Sticky Situation Over Teflon Chemical
- 1.4.06 Utah To Test Water For Perchlorate Levels
- 1.4.06 Utah will test water for rocket fuel chemical
- 1.3.06 State drinking water rated average
- 1.2.06 Public needs to know about health hazards
- 12.31.05 FDA to check tuna
- 12.28.05 Ohio Ranks 10th in Water Contaminants
- 12.28.05 Survey looks at city's water quality
- 12.24.05 Activists target drinking water standards
- 12.23.05 Montgomery Water Works Responds to National Water Quality Report
- 12.22.05 Environmental group produces report on PUB water
- 12.21.05 EPA has work to do on drinking water standards
- 12.21.05 Officials: Local water safe, despite new survey
- 12.21.05 What's On Tap In Your Water?
- 12.21.05 How Clean is Wisconsin's Drinking Water?
- 12.21.05 Officials: Local drinking water is safe
- 12.21.05 Tap water filled with chemicals
- 12.21.05 N.C. ranks 5th in tap-water impurities
- 12.21.05 Environmental Group Finds Unwanted Chemicals In Drinking Water
- 12.21.05 Officials dispute negative report on drinking water
- 12.21.05 N.C. Gets Poor Marks For Tap Water
- 12.21.05 What's in Your Tap Water?
- 12.21.05 Tap Water Report
- 12.21.05 Public Data Shows Hundreds of Chemicals in Tap Water
- 12.21.05 Arizona third worst for water contaminants
- 12.21.05 Group criticizes Nevada's tap water quality; agency disagrees
- 12.20.05 Dangerous Drinking Water
- 12.20.05 Public data show chemicals in tap water
- 12.20.05 Bottled Water Sales Soar as Tap Water Safety Questioned
- 12.20.05 DNR Sticks Up For Wisconsin's Drinking Water
- 12.20.05 Web site quenches interest in water
- 12.20.05 Wisconsin's Drinking Water One of Worst in Nation - Says Environmental Group
- 12.20.05 Drinking water washes out in study
- 12.16.05 A broader discussion might help clear the air
- 12.15.05 Something fishy in the tuna aisle
- 12.15.05 DuPont to pay record fine in Teflon settlement
- 12.15.05 DuPont agrees to $10M fine in C8 case
- 12.15.05 DuPont Settles Charges That It Hid Toxic Risk Data
- 12.15.05 DuPont to pay $10.25M fine, $6.25M for research
- 12.15.05 DuPont to Pay $16.5 Million for Unreported Risks
- 12.15.05 DuPont settles case on toxins
- 12.15.05 DuPont, EPA Settle Chemical Complaint
- 12.15.05 DuPont fined $16.5 million by the EPA
- 12.15.05 DuPont settles EPA case on Teflon chemical
- 12.15.05 DuPont agrees to pay $16.5 million in EPA settlement
- 12.14.05 EPA Fines DuPont $16.5M for Teflon Cover-Up
- 12.14.05 DuPont Analysis
- 12.14.05 DuPont to pay $10 million federal fine
- 12.14.05 Dupont fined more than $10 million over Teflon reporting
- 12.14.05 DuPont Settles With EPA
- 12.14.05 DuPont to pay $16.5 million in EPA case
- 12.13.05 How safe is tuna?
- 12.12.05 U.S. safety net in tatters
- 12.9.05 Friday Consumer Alert: Teflon
- 12.8.05 Food containers need attention
- 12.6.05 Top Engineer: DuPont Hid Dangers for Years of Chemical Within Teflon, Paper Products
- 12.2.05 Two testify 3M tried to avoid tests
- 12.2.05 State lawmakers grill MPCA about 3M chemicals
- 12.2.05 State plan angered 3M official, MPCA officials tell panel
- 12.1.05 Legislative hearing raises questions about MPCA, 3M relationship
- 11.30.05 DuPont, EPA Settle Case On Chemical Disclosure
- 11.30.05 Public, regulators and regulated are in the dark about DuPont
- 11.29.05 DuPont seeking cause of seepage
- 11.21.05 DuPont on defensive over PFOA allegation
- 11.21.05 DuPont hit by allegations over safety of packaging chemical
- 11.20.05 Whistleblower Raises Serious Concerns Over Teflon-Related DuPont Chemical Used to Coat Billions of Food Containers
- 11.19.05 Chemical faces scrutiny
- 11.18.05 Brian Ross Investigates: Toxic Food Wrappers?
- 11.18.05 Whistleblower Questions Teflon's Safety
- 11.18.05 The MPCA's mission has gone astray
- 11.18.05 Consumer Alert: Teflon
- 11.17.05 C8 dangers covered up, DuPont
- 11.17.05 Engineer: DuPont hid facts about paper coating
- 11.17.05 Group says DuPont hid dangers of coating
- 11.17.05 Ex-Employee Calls DuPont Negligent
- 11.17.05 More Dangers With C-8?
- 11.16.05 Hidden risks of Teflon-like chemical raised by documents, company insider
- 11.16.05 Whistle-blower: DuPont knows food-packaging risk
- 11.14.05 Food wrappers have excess C8, engineer says
- 11.6.05 Thousands sign up for C8 health screening
- 11.5.05 DuPont: $1 billion a year at stake on C8
- 11.3.05 Contaminant Found in Utah Milk
- 11.1.05 Dirty Central Valley air a problem that needs solving
- 10.31.05 Government must keep mercury promise
- 10.27.05 Iron, steel healthy alternatives to Teflon
- 10.26.05 Lawmakers looking into 3M chemicals, 'outrageous' allegations
- 10.26.05 Amid controversy, MPCA paying more attention to 3M chemicals
- 10.26.05 Pollution researcher says agency hindered her work
- 10.25.05 MPCA scientist says bosses tried to silence her
- 10.25.05 MPCA scientist tells lawmakers her research on 3M chemicals was blocked
- 10.24.05 Scientist finds self at center of storm
- 10.24.05 How toxic is your bathroom?
- 10.21.05 U. of Maryland looks to dislodge hook of confusion in consumers
- 10.16.05 Agencies widen study of toxins in fish
- 10.13.05 Toxic chemicals found in children's teethers, mattresses, and bath books
- 10.12.05 Fish consumption during pregnancy helps fetal brain development
- 10.9.05 Medical studies raise questions about phthalates
- 10.8.05 Teflon and Cancer
- 10.1.05 Protecting Your Kids This Fall: Fluoride, Ozone and Mercury
- 9.28.05 Professor
- 9.23.05 Women in Coastal Areas Are Found to Have Higher Mercury Levels
- 9.20.05 Council passes resolution urging reduction of fluoride
- 9.19.05 Some rethink fluoridation of water
- 9.4.05 Use With Discretion
- 9.1.05 Harper's Index
- 8.31.05 EPA unions call for moratorium on fluoride in drinking water
- 8.28.05 Letter to the Editor
- 8.27.05 Nonstick Pollution Sticks in People
- 8.26.05 Flame retardants lingering in humans
- 8.23.05 FDA opposes additional warning over mercury in canned tuna
- 8.21.05 Vaccines should be mercury-free
- 8.21.05 Caution urged for contact with C8
- 8.16.05 University of Pennsylvania C8 Study Recommendations Presented to Little Hocking Consumers
- 8.16.05 Avoid C8 water, researcher says
- 8.16.05 So Far, So Good in Study of C8
- 8.15.05 Contaminated VAAP areas to get cleanup
- 8.12.05 Research exposes fluoride danger
- 8.12.05 DuPont C8 Tests OK With EPA
- 8.11.05 C8 Investigation Could Provoke Nationwide Testing
- 8.4.05 Mandatory fluoridation battle not over
- 8.3.05 Activists ask for oversight over DuPont
- 8.3.05 Sticky situation: debate over safety of Teflon
- 8.1.05 Chem plant under microscope
- 7.29.05 High C8 chemical levels reported in Ohio
- 7.27.05 Is There an Extra Ingredient in Nonstick Pans?
- 7.27.05 Pans and packages, oh my
- 7.27.05 Turning up the heat on Teflon
- 7.25.05 DuPont stuck with Teflon lawsuits
- 7.24.05 Will Environmental Fear Stick to DuPont's Teflon?
- 7.23.05 Ohioans show high levels of C8 in blood
- 7.21.05 Taking a Closer Look at Fluoride
- 7.20.05 Independent tests find higher levels of C8
- 7.19.05 Suit Being Filed Against DuPont Over Teflon
- 7.19.05 Local law firms to lead Teflon class action
- 7.19.05 Teflon firm faces fresh lawsuit
- 7.17.05 It's toxic, but DuPont wants it near homes
- 7.17.05 Miss. DuPont plant facing lawsuits
- 7.14.05 Possible dangers of using nonstick cookware
- 7.13.05 Professor at Harvard Is Being Investigated
- 7.13.05 Harvard Professor Investigated in Fluoride Research Flap
- 7.12.05 Teflon Safety Gets Closer Look
- 7.12.05 DuPont Agrees on Payback for Pollution Claims
- 7.11.05 American Potable Water
- 7.11.05 Harvard dentist investigated
- 7.10.05 DuPont Proposed, Dropped '81 Study of C8, Birth Defects
- 7.7.05 Review board members differ on potential risks of Teflon chemical
- 7.7.05 Group calls for Timmermeyer to quit over C8
- 7.7.05 DuPont disputes EPA's C-8 review
- 7.6.05 Teflon and Safety: Chemical Likely a Carcinogen
- 7.6.05 Government Tries to Solve C8 Puzzle
- 7.4.05 EPA panel: PFOA likely to cause cancer
- 7.3.05 DuPont lawyer edited DEP's C8 media releases
- 7.2.05 Teflon in cancer risk spotlight again
- 7.1.05 Dental School Begins Investigation of Prof
- 6.30.05 Panel calls chemical a 'likely carcinogen'
- 6.30.05 Citizens uneasy over EPA report that says C8
- 6.30.05 According to report, C8 'likely carcinogen'
- 6.29.05 Harvard launches probe in dental research flap
- 6.29.05 EPA: DuPont's C-8 a 'likely' carcinogen
- 6.29.05 Does Teflon Chemical Cause Cancer?
- 6.29.05 Board: Teflon Cancer Risks Downplayed
- 6.29.05 PFOA, chemical found in Teflon, may be cancer-causing agent
- 6.29.05 C8 a 'likely carcinogen,' EPA panel concludes
- 6.29.05 Industry lobbyist to run clean-air board
- 6.29.05 Compound in Teflon A 'Likely Carcinogen'
- 6.29.05 Teflon Troubles
- 6.29.05 Panel's Report Connects C8 More Strongly to Cancer
- 6.28.05 Claim: Doctor fudged fluoride findings
- 6.28.05 Group: Dentist hid fluoride-cancer link
- 6.15.05 The Sticking Point
- 6.7.05 Teflon in a sticky situation
- 6.6.05 Health Watch: Answers a Snip Away
- 5.28.05 Board wants more review of DEP's C8 deal
- 5.27.05 Cosmetics linked to problem in infant sons
- 5.27.05 Chemicals found to impair baby boys' genitals
- 5.26.05 Chemical found in groundwater near DuPont plant in Fayetteville
- 5.26.05 DuPont monitors chemical pollution
- 5.24.05 DuPont shareholders seek SEC probe
- 5.20.05 Feds seek DuPont records
- 5.20.05 DuPont faces C8 criminal probe
- 5.19.05 DuPont's Latest Battle
- 5.19.05 Jury seeks DuPont Teflon documents
- 5.19.05 Teflon trouble
- 5.19.05 DuPont Subpoenaed in Teflon-Ingredient Health Probe
- 5.18.05 No deal: Pollution scuttles plant
- 5.18.05 Chemicals' toxicity debated
- 5.17.05 The Age of Autism: Mercury ascending
- 5.13.05 Teflon Precursor Possible Cause of Birth Defects
- 5.13.05 Food Plant Lawsuit
- 5.12.05 Lawsuit: C8 in water scuttled $36m Parkersburg plant deal
- 5.7.05 DuPont settles in Teflon case
- 5.7.05 DuPont settles charges over C8 Government said chemical giant hides info about dangers
- 5.5.05 Makeup of Makeup
- 4.29.05 Air board toughens standards on smog
- 4.29.05 Smog Rule Tougher, But It's Symbolic
- 4.28.05 Analysis: Half of U.S. breathes dirty air
- 4.28.05 California panel adopts nation's toughest pollution standards
- 4.28.05 Air quality standard is expected to go up
- 4.28.05 State set to adopt nation's toughest pollution standards
- 4.27.05 New rules toughen smog war
- 4.26.05 DuPont Investors Want Full Disclosure of Teflon Costs
- 4.26.05 Returning to the Scene of the Crime
- 4.25.05 On Earth Day Women Battle Rising Mercury Hazards
- 4.22.05 Clear savings in smog report
- 4.22.05 Earth Day
- 4.22.05 Earth Day is time for little choices that will add up
- 4.22.05 United Steelworkers to Paper Companies: Beware of Zonyl
- 4.21.05 Study links California pollution to $521 million in health costs
- 4.21.05 Smog costing schools millions in absences
- 4.21.05 Study claims bad air costs Kern millions
- 4.21.05 Smog Strips $520 Million a Year From California Wallets
- 4.21.05 Tough rules on smog may get tougher
- 4.21.05 Cleaner air will save money, says study
- 4.21.05 Union contacts paper companies about safety of DuPont chemical
- 4.20.05 Smog, kids a costly mix
- 4.12.05 Fire retardant a health risk
- 4.6.05 Uneasy about Nonstick Cookware?
- 4.6.05 A Fish Story
- 4.5.05 Perchlorate Exposure: Tip of the Iceberg?
- 4.1.05 'Health goal' for perchlorate will remain
- 3.27.05 Report: Spokane-area fish tainted with high levels of toxins
- 3.23.05 Study says household dust holds dangerous chemicals
- 3.22.05 Cosmetics firms fear crackdown on safety of products
- 3.22.05 New EPA Mercury Rule Omits Conflicting Data
- 3.21.05 Permits reissued for DuPont landfill in Wood County
- 3.20.05 There's something in the air, and it may be coming from your carpet
- 3.18.05 Is make-up making you sick?
- 3.17.05 DU finds no Teflon-related contamination in water, but lawsuit test results disagree
- 3.16.05 EPA orders industry to cut mercury 70%
- 3.16.05 3M to stop making chemical
- 3.16.05 Chemical industry to use less C8 in its products
- 3.16.05 Groups condemn EPA's mercury rule
- 3.16.05 3M to slash use of toxic chemical
- 3.16.05 Industry vows to reduce chemical used to make nonstick coatings
- 3.15.05 The Age of Autism: Mercury in the air
- 3.14.05 Bush to Permit Trading of Credits to Limit Mercury
- 3.11.05 More 3M water testing urged
- 3.8.05 EPA Distorted Mercury Analysis, GAO Says
- 2.21.05 Parents, experts push ban on mercury in some vaccines
- 2.5.05 Eateries Agree to Mercury Warnings
- 2.4.05 State considers own rules to curb mercury pollution
- 2.1.05 Older men with high mercury levels are at risk
- 1.26.05 Scientists worry that mercury dangers mimic deadly lead
- 1.23.05 EPA's mercury Web site has some hot under the collar
- 1.14.05 Panel Says Perchlorate Safe at Levels Higher Than EPA Recommendations
- 1.6.05 Some children have increased risk of developing autism after exposure to mercury
- 12.23.04 Teflon production linked to cholesterol
- 12.22.04 Mercury taints Orchard Lake; Michigan testing finds pollutants make fish unsafe to consume
- 12.14.04 Study suggests mercury-autism link
- 12.13.04 Study sees possible autism-vaccine link
- 12.13.04 Gene flaw may link autism, vaccine additive
- 12.13.04 Research supports link in autism to mercury
- 12.13.04 Some Kids May Have Autism Risk from Mercury -Group
- 12.13.04 Study: Autistic children struggle to protect selves from toxic metals
- 12.7.04 Belle Glade lettuce samples have high levels of toxic rocket fuel component
- 12.7.04 EPA challenges DuPont on C-8 reports
- 11.30.04 The Sticking Point
- 11.27.04 Signs of flame retardant rise in Lake Michigan
- 11.26.04 DuPont Didn't Disclose Reports on Teflon Risks, Officials Charge
- 11.25.04 Alarm bells silent on Teflon
- 11.25.04 EPA raises C-8 reporting concerns
- 11.25.04 EPA Moves to Widen Case Against DuPont
- 11.24.04 Teflon: the miracle comes unstuck
- 11.24.04 $70 million health study for Teflon chemical
- 11.19.04 DuPont Faces New Complaint; Group Says Firm Withheld Plaintiffs' Blood Test Results
- 11.18.04 US Environmental Agency has not ruled out more charges against Dupont
- 11.18.04 DuPont found high C8 in blood, study shows
- 11.18.04 DuPont accused of deceit on C-8
- 11.17.04 Scientists warn of undetected, unmeasured toxins in world's fish
- 11.17.04 Environmental Group petitions for records of federal meetings
- 11.4.04 The Sticking Point: Debate Over Teflon
- 10.14.04 3M faces Cottage Grove suit; Chemical-contamination claim joins two others filed in Alabama
- 10.7.04 Mercury in newborns tied to moms' diets
- 10.6.04 Tuna's Red Glare? It Could Be Carbon Monoxide
- 10.4.04 Council warns of Teflon use
- 10.2.04 3M suit targets plant in South
- 9.26.04 3M lawsuit draws a crowd
- 9.19.04 Teflon mystery raises safety questions
- 8.23.04 The shock risk in our toiletries
- 8.20.04 A Little Too Slick?
- 8.19.04 Mercury levels in fish a concern for at-risk groups
- 8.17.04 Killing us slowly
- 8.17.04 China's Zhejiang Supor Cookware opens flat in Shenzhen debut
- 8.17.04 Mercury should have EPA feverish
- 8.15.04 Former 3M chemicals showing up in remote places
- 8.15.04 Former 3M chemical is widespread
- 8.13.04 DuPont says again it met disclosure rules
- 7.22.04 Unhappy at teflon tag
- 7.21.04 Teflon comes unstuck in China `mass panic'
- 7.20.04 Toxic Chemical Exposure
- 7.6.04 Don't back off on mercury rules
- 7.6.04 New mercury findings spur group to act
- 7.6.04 European Environmental Rules Propel Change in U.S.
- 6.25.04 EPA to make independent inquiry of PFOA in environment
- 6.24.04 Women and kids should strictly limit fish: experts
- 6.22.04 Atty. Gen. Sues Over Tuna
- 6.19.04 Perchlorate's Effect on Sensitive Populations
- 6.10.04 State takes lead in setting limits for perchlorate
- 6.7.04 Flame retardant in breast milk raises concern
- 6.4.04 Pentagon again delays perchlorate information
- 6.3.04 Dust from PCs may be toxic
- 6.2.04 Women's health symposium
- 6.1.04 Too many products carry chemical danger to children
- 5.31.04 Tuna Meltdown
- 5.30.04 Children at risk from cosmetics
- 5.25.04 Common chemicals in cosmetics worry some
- 5.24.04 Study Finds N.C. Mercury Levels Above Safe Levels
- 5.20.04 Public should be warned of mercury dangers in some fish
- 5.19.04 Family Physicians Group Under Fire for Tuna Fish Ad
- 5.19.04 Alarming Alert About Fish
- 5.16.04 Bonus from mother's milk
- 5.14.04 Eat Fish, Have a Bigger Baby
- 5.8.04 DuPont papers will be unsealed
- 5.5.04 Study links C8 to higher cancer rates
- 5.3.04 Questions about some cosmetics
- 5.1.04 Do You Really Want to Eat That Tuna?
- 5.1.04 Pentagon misses report date
- 4.30.04 DuPont to study workers' health; goal is to determine impact of C8
- 4.30.04 DuPont to test workers for C8
- 4.30.04 Activists Push for Safer Ingredients in Makeup
- 4.29.04 Hill Web Sites Questioned
- 4.26.04 Preventing fires, igniting questions
- 4.22.04 Bringing Earth Day Home
- 4.21.04 How much tuna is safe to eat?
- 4.21.04 How much tuna is safe to eat?
- 4.19.04 Attorneys general criticize military environmental exemptions
- 4.18.04 Children, some women should limit fish intake, government says
- 4.18.04 Mercury advisory becomes hooked to other concerns
- 4.18.04 Impose stricter mercury limits
- 4.15.04 Get tough on mercury emissions
- 4.14.04 U.S. needs tougher mercury policy
- 4.13.04 Senators attack mercury proposal
- 4.12.04 Science or politics?
- 4.9.04 New Jersey Scientist Says Rewritten Mercury Regulations Downplay Toxicity
- 4.8.04 Park has big fish to fry: mercury in trout
- 4.8.04 Study: Pregnant women eating too much fish
- 4.6.04 Waco and Belton lake users safe from perchlorate
- 4.5.04 Profit comes before preserving the planet
- 4.5.04 Trolling for a market niche -- smaller tuna's health hook
- 4.4.04 Mercury darkens mood of anglers
- 4.4.04 Mercury's taint
- 4.2.04 Hold The Tuna
- 4.1.04 Senators want Leavitt to pull back on mercury rules
- 3.31.04 Protect unborn from mercury
- 3.29.04 Don't Eat That Fish
- 3.29.04 Heed state's mercury warnings
- 3.29.04 Panelist: Fish advisory ignored findings
- 3.29.04 Who'll stop the mercury rain?
- 3.24.04 Water vendor pushing bill to weaken state's water standards
- 3.23.04 Mercury Sounds Seafood Alarm at FDA
- 3.23.04 Mercury Sounds Seafood Alarm at FDA
- 3.21.04 U.S. Issues New Guidelines Limiting Fish Intake
- 3.20.04 Federal Caveat Issued on the Catch of the Day
- 3.20.04 U.S. urges limits on eating albacore
- 3.20.04 Mothers-to-be, children warned: Limit tuna in diet
- 3.20.04 Limits Urged on Eating Tuna
- 3.20.04 Albacore tuna draws a warning
- 3.20.04 2 agencies urge limit on eating tuna
- 3.19.04 Eat Lower-Mercury Fish, U.S. Tells Women, Children
- 3.19.04 New Fish Guidelines Issued, Prompted By Mercury Concerns
- 3.19.04 Children, some women should limit fish intake, government says
- 3.19.04 Women, Children Warned About Tuna Consumption
- 3.19.04 Mercury Fears Spur New Fish Consumption Guidelines
- 3.18.04 Calif. Water Standard Prompts Debate
- 3.18.04 Fishing For Answers
- 3.17.04 FAQ on the risks, benefits of fish
- 3.12.04 California regulators set goal for perchlorate in drinking water
- 3.12.04 Concerns in California over the levels of the chemical perchlorate in the drinking water supply
- 3.12.04 State floats water goal
- 3.11.04 State Plans to Regulate Perchlorate
- 3.8.04 Move on mercury: Study should prompt tougher rules on emissions
- 3.7.04 More poison for your food?
- 3.7.04 When corporations need an expert, he gladly answers the call
- 3.3.04 Tell EPA to cut mercury pollution
- 3.2.04 Mercury: Enough!
- 3.1.04 Tuna Danger
- 2.25.04 Illinois mercury levels in spotlight
- 2.21.04 Mercury debate energized in Illinois town
- 2.17.04 Mercury rising
- 2.16.04 Act Fast on Mercury Threat
- 2.16.04 Indiana lets feds deal with mercury
- 2.13.04 In the fish we eat, mercury rising
- 2.12.04 Mercury worries rising
- 2.12.04 Connect the dots/What's shaping mercury rules?
- 2.12.04 Editorial: Connect the dots/What's shaping mercury rules?
- 2.10.04 Small tuna found to hold less mercury
- 2.7.04 Young Sentinels of Peril
- 2.7.04 Pregnant women get new mercury warning
- 2.6.04 Mercury Dangers for Unborn
- 2.6.04 Newborns' Mercury Exposure Worse Than Thought, EPA Says
- 2.6.04 Mercury Study Shows Permanent Damage to Children
- 2.6.04 Mercury Threat To Fetus Raised
- 2.5.04 Fish pregnant women can eat, and how much
- 2.5.04 Fish pregnant women can eat, and how much
- 2.5.04 Mercury: Twice as Many Newborns at Risk for Developmental, Learning Problems
- 2.4.04 EPA raises estimate of newborns exposed to mercury
- 2.4.04 EPA raises estimate of newborns exposed to mercury
- 2.2.04 Mountain Cooking: Teflon coated cookware is not a good choice
- 2.1.04 EPA rule on mercury gives coal-burners flexibility
- 2.1.04 Aerojet working on sites polluted with perchlorate
- 2.1.04 EPA rule on mercury gives coal-burners flexibility
- 1.31.04 Proposed Mercury Rules Bear Industry Mark
- 1.31.04 Proposed Mercury Rules Bear Industry Mark
- 1.28.04 Tighter water rules make factions clash
- 1.4.04 Mercury findings spur group to act
- 1.1.04 Obstetrics:
- 12.26.03 Concerns rise over fire retardant
- 12.22.03 Can The Tuna?
- 12.22.03 What's Up With Tuna?
- 12.21.03 FDA flounders in not fessing up to mercury in tuna
- 12.20.03 A Mercury Non-Policy
- 12.17.03 Mercury in Fish
- 12.17.03 More mercury longer
- 12.16.03 Another Fast-Food Fear
- 12.15.03 Palm Beach Post
- 12.14.03 CDC sniffs out Scotchgard
- 12.13.03 North Carolina called a mercury 'hot spot'
- 12.12.03 Panel: Pregnant women should be warned about canned albacore
- 12.12.03 Regulators Want More Details About Mercury In Fish
- 12.11.03 Tuna Found Harmful to Pregnant Women
- 12.11.03 Pentagon: Rocket Fuel in Your Lettuce is Safe
- 12.7.03 Cut the spin on perchlorate
- 12.1.03 What's in Your "Organic" Shampoo
- 11.22.03 Federal tests find perchlorate in food
- 11.17.03 Transcript: Teflon Flu
- 11.14.03 SAFE OR SORRY? NEW EVIDENCE REVEALS DANGERS OF TEFLON
- 11.3.03 Toxic Immunity
- 11.1.03 What's in your "Organic" Shampoo
- 11.1.03 DuPont's Teflon Dilemma
- 10.30.03 Is Often-Used Chemical Affecting You?
- 10.1.03 Danger in the skillet zone
- 9.27.03 Examining the water we drink: Concerns about C8 linger
- 9.26.03 Yuma scientist continues study of perchlorate in water, crops
- 9.11.03 Test tomato crop free of perchlorate
- 9.6.03 Arsenal told to test water for pollutant
- 8.28.03 Mercury-in-fish issue airing at city restaurant
- 8.18.03 DEAR DESI
- 8.17.03 Health Study may Include C8
- 8.6.03 Public has a right to know about carcinogens
- 8.1.03 Teflon may be hazardous
- 7.30.03 JPG contamination report expected in August
- 7.28.03 C8 also found in some McDonald's packaging
- 7.26.03 Research group presses fast food industry for facts on packaging
- 7.24.03 Bay fish still contaminated, study finds
- 7.24.03 Bill to Phase Out Chemical Fire Retardants Goes to Davis
- 7.18.03 Senate OKs Bill to Ban Retardant
- 7.17.03 Environmentalists Criticize EPA Drinking Water Regulation
- 7.17.03 Warnings on Teflon products not required
- 7.16.03 Tuna Salad on Rye-Hold the Tuna?
- 7.15.03 EPA decision on perchlorate under fire
- 7.15.03 EPA proposes new drinking water rules but no new regulations for contaminants
- 7.14.03 SPI reaches tentative pact on PFOA tests
- 7.14.03 EPA Investigates Group's Charge Regarding PFOA
- 7.12.03 Teflon Warning Label Rejected
- 7.11.03 Anti-fire agents polluting Bay Area
- 7.11.03 Scientists Warn of Toxins In San Francisco Bay
- 7.11.03 Bay fish show rising levels of fire retardant, study says
- 7.10.03 Chemicals: PBDE Levels Higher in California Fish, Bird Eggs
- 7.7.03 State should ID mercury's source
- 7.5.03 A link to more information
- 7.3.03 DuPont is Developing Own Way to Filter C8
- 7.1.03 New advisory on fish coming from federal agency
- 7.1.03 Boeing is ordered to track rocket fuel pollutant
- 7.1.03 Kentucky Firm Claims It Can Reduce C8 Levels
- 7.1.03 Matters of Scale
- 7.1.03 Teflon et décalage toxique
- 6.29.03 United Nations' committee sets tougher limits than United States for mercury levels in food
- 6.29.03 Future Dims for 'Clear Skies' Initiative
- 6.29.03 Rocket fuel ingredient linked to health problems
- 6.29.03 Launching a debut for an old product;
- 6.27.03 Supreme Court to hear DuPont petitions
- 6.26.03 EPA Committees Meeting on C8
- 6.24.03 Stirring the Waters
- 6.21.03 Federal Agencies Press For Inventory Of Products With C8
- 6.19.03 Snapshot perchlorate agriculture study
- 6.12.03 Study finds "safe" mercury levels may harm adults
- 6.7.03 EPA, DuPont Debate Conditions for Chemical Study
- 6.7.03 Sticky Situation
- 6.7.03 EPA asks DuPont for Teflon evidence
- 6.7.03 EPA hears from local citizens
- 6.6.03 Local rep to monitor hearing about C8
- 6.6.03 Chemical contamination widespread in eastern county's water
- 6.5.03 Chemicals under scrutiny found in California kids, San Diego birds
- 6.2.03 County citizens to participate in C8 hearing
- 6.2.03 Death by the range
- 5.29.03 Our Opinion: Community urged to submit C8 comments
- 5.28.03 Scotchgard is attractive again
- 5.28.03 EPA hearing on C8 draws interest
- 5.27.03 New EPA leader may affect C8 inquiry
- 5.22.03 Standard, not delays, needed
- 5.21.03 Teflon dangers
- 5.20.03 Out of the Frying Pan, Into a Fire
- 5.19.03 Tainted Harvest
- 5.16.03 Concern about Teflon and Birds Heats Up
- 5.15.03 Environmental group warns of the danger of Teflon cookware
- 5.13.03 Bringing Pollution Right to Your Table
- 5.12.03 Perchlorate: Air Force Abandons Study on Chemical in Crops
- 5.12.03 Rocket Fuel
- 5.11.03 Perchlorate found in plants, animals at six sites in U.S. in 2001
- 5.11.03 Tainted lettuce probably sold in Las Vegas
- 5.11.03 Food risk test spurned
- 5.11.03 Newspaper report: Air Force failed to complete key chemical study
- 5.8.03 Proposal Aims to Discover Sources of Toxic Perchlorate That Taints Water
- 5.8.03 Judge: DuPont chemical is toxic
- 5.8.03 DuPont to appeal Wood Co. judge's order in C8 case
- 5.7.03 Europe Considers Phthalates Ban; FDA Rejects Labeling Petition
- 5.7.03 Judge Hill: C-8 is toxic to humans
- 5.6.03 Teflon Dangers
- 5.5.03 Perchlorate gag order
- 5.5.03 Valley lettuce is 'clean'
- 5.5.03 Failure at the FDA
- 5.5.03 Senators turn up heat on river chemical leak
- 5.3.03 Call for perchlorate probe warranted
- 5.3.03 Military seeks a pass on pollution
- 5.3.03 Rocket fuel in produce from U.S. spurs tests
- 5.3.03 Perchlorate stirs up Capitol Hill
- 5.2.03 Food Group Downplays Perchlorate Fears
- 5.2.03 US lettuce contains rocket fuel pollutant
- 5.2.03 Leafy Toxins
- 5.1.03 Environmental group finds four tainted lettuce samples
- 5.1.03 DuPont chief defends C-8
- 4.30.03 Tainted lettuce
- 4.30.03 Contaminated lettuce could have been sold in Nevada
- 4.29.03 Group issues new warning on winter lettuce
- 4.29.03 Probe sought after study reports toxin in lettuce
- 4.29.03 Feds to test for toxin in food items
- 4.29.03 Roquefort on the salad? Or Ranch? Rocket Fuel?
- 4.29.03 Perchlorate: It's time for answers
- 4.29.03 Winter Lettuce May Come With Rocket Fuel
- 4.29.03 Perchlorate level too high in lettuce crop, group says
- 4.29.03 The Poison of Ignorance
- 4.29.03 Study: perchlorate contaminates crops
- 4.29.03 Lab Tests Show Traces of Rocket Fuel in Lettuce
- 4.29.03 Group says winter lettuce contaminated
- 4.29.03 Rocket Fuel Chemical Found in Lettuce
- 4.29.03 Toxic chemicals found on lettuce
- 4.29.03 Studies find disturbing amounts of chemical contamination in lettuce
- 4.29.03 Calif. lettuce contains toxins
- 4.29.03 Lettuce research no reason to skip salad, experts say
- 4.28.03 Pollutant detected in winter produce
- 4.28.03 Lettuce in Stores May Be Contaminated
- 4.28.03 More tainted lettuce found
- 4.28.03 Perchlorate may garnish your salad
- 4.28.03 Cold War toxin seeps into Western water
- 4.28.03 Group questions lettuce safety
- 4.28.03 Rocket Fuel Contaminating U.S. Lettuce - Study
- 4.28.03 Advocacy group finds contaminant in lettuce
- 4.28.03 Study finds toxic chemical in lettuce from two counties
- 4.28.03 Lettuce Samples Found Tainted
- 4.27.03 Toxic ingredient found in lettuce
- 4.27.03 Special Report: Growing concerns: While scientists debate the risks, a study finds the rocket-fuel chemical in inland lettuce
- 4.24.03 Testing set for water in Valley
- 4.23.03 Studying Health Risks
- 4.22.03 EPA seeks citizen input on C8
- 4.21.03 Military's success at environmentalism may hinder new plans
- 4.20.03 Cities still have concerns about groundwater contamination by former McGregor plant
- 4.19.03 DuPont told to pay for C8 blood tests
- 4.19.03 DuPont must test residents
- 4.18.03 Teflon Chemical to be Reviewed
- 4.16.03 EPA to study safety of chemical used in making Teflon
- 4.16.03 EPA steps up study of Teflon chemical risk to humans
- 4.16.03 Sticking Point With Teflon
- 4.16.03 Feds continue to look at C8
- 4.15.03 E.P.A. Orders Companies to Examine Effects of Chemicals
- 4.15.03 Regulators challenge safety of chemical used to make Teflon
- 4.15.03 Common chemical may cause deaths, defects
- 4.15.03 DuPont confronted over chemical's safety
- 4.15.03 EPA worried about chemical found in household items
- 4.15.03 DuPont chemical under scrutiny
- 4.15.03 EPA plans additional study of C8's impact
- 4.15.03 EPA Ponders Synthetic Chemical's Human Risk;
- 4.15.03 Chemicals: Health Concerns Prompt EPA to Intensify Review of Teflon Ingredient
- 4.15.03 EPA Probes Widely Used Chemical
- 4.14.03 EPA to investigate chemical found in many household items
- 4.14.03 Research Group Alleges Dupont Withheld Toxic Finding
- 4.14.03 EPA Launches Probe Into Chemical Found In Many Products
- 4.14.03 EPA steps up study of Teflon chemical risk to humans
- 4.14.03 EPA to investigate claim DuPont hid chemical risk
- 4.11.03 Advocacy Group Accuses DuPont Of Hiding Birth-Defect Data
- 4.9.03 Group Says C8 Use Should Stop
- 4.6.03 Chemical Drawing Attention
- 4.5.03 DuPont Chemical Showing Up in Blood of Children, Adults;
- 4.4.03 Draft EPA Reports Finds Risks From Teflon Ingredient
- 4.4.03 Concerns grow about risk from DuPont chemical C8
- 4.2.03 Feinstein demands Defense Department clean up water pollutant
- 4.1.03 Teflon Coming Under Fire
- 3.30.03 Chemical Used in Teflon Production May Pose Threat
- 3.30.03 Department of Defense needs to take lead in perchloate clean-up
- 3.29.03 Chemical Might Pose Health Risk to Younger Women and Girls
- 3.29.03 Report cites potential danger of C8
- 3.28.03 What's in the Water?
- 3.28.03 EPA says women, children more susceptible to C8 risks than men
- 3.28.03 DuPont Chemical May Harm Females
- 3.28.03 DuPont's C8 risks greater than acceptable, feds find
- 3.27.03 Safety, air and water: Defense officials haven't shown pollution rules hurt readiness
- 3.19.03 DuPont: C8 emissions to drop dramatically
- 3.12.03 C8 Dispute Leaves Citizens Confused
- 3.12.03 FDA may act on mercury problem this fall, says chief medical officer
- 3.11.03 Group wants EPA probe of DuPont, report on C8
- 3.5.03 Staying Organic
- 2.23.03 DuPont Chemical Worries Ohio EPA
- 12.21.02 High levels seen in vegetable grown with local tainted water
- 12.2.02 EU Reaches Agreement to Impose Ban On Use of Toxics in Cosmetic Products
- 11.26.02 Beauty Coverup?
- 11.25.02 Phthalates Stay in U.S. Cosmetics; Activists Vow to Step Up Opposition
- 11.20.02 Too much fish has its risks
- 11.20.02 Cosmetics Industry Approves Controversial Chemicals
- 11.20.02 Chemicals: Panel Says Phthalates Safe In Cosmetics
- 10.23.02 Advice sounds fishy
- 10.16.02 Scent of trouble surrounds cosmetics
- 10.16.02 FDA Panel To Review Seafood Safety
- 10.1.02 Fish Safety Alert
- 9.3.02 Tuna warning: FDA must make risks more widely known
- 7.29.02 Mercury: Pregnant women should avoid tuna - FDA panel
- 7.29.02 FDA cautions pregnant women on tuna
- 7.26.02 CAN TUNA HABIT, MOM Mercury called risk to fetuses
- 7.26.02 Panel: Pregnant Women Avoid Tuna
- 7.26.02 Pregnant women should limit tuna intake, panel says
- 7.26.02 Put strong warning on tuna, FDA told
- 7.26.02 FDA panel wants pregnant women advised on tuna in diet
- 7.26.02 Pregnant women should limit tuna intake, panel says
- 7.26.02 Newsbriefs - Tuna Limits in Pregnancy
- 7.26.02 Can tuna-eating if pregnant: Study
- 7.25.02 Food safety panel recommends tuna advisory
- 7.25.02 On mercury, FDA feels heat
- 7.25.02 Moms-to-be should limit tuna, panel says
- 7.25.02 FDA panel recommends more study of tuna mercury levels
- 7.25.02 FDA Mulls Fish Diet for Pregnant Women
- 7.24.02 FDA Looks Into Pregnant Women, Fish
- 7.24.02 Seeking warning labels on canned tuna
- 7.24.02 FDA: Panel Weighs Stronger Warnings on Fish Consumption
- 7.24.02 FDA Studies Fish Diet, Pregnancy
- 7.24.02 Critics question FDA on tuna safety
- 7.23.02 FDA Panel To Review Seafood Safety
- 7.22.02 FDA to review mercury levels in seafood
- 7.21.02 Agencies’ contradictions cloud issue
- 7.15.02 Opinion: Beware Carcinogens, Phthalates in Cosmetics
- 7.15.02 FDA Issues Public Health Notification on Phthalates in Medical Devices
- 7.12.02 Chemicals: Cosmetics said to needlessly contain dangerous Phthalates
- 7.12.02 UPDATE - Cosmetics full of suspect chemicals, group says
- 7.11.02 Environmental group tests beauty products for chemicals
- 7.11.02 Harmful phthalates found in three-quarters of beauty products tested
- 7.11.02 Cosmetics ingredient said to cause birth defects
- 7.11.02 Cosmetics full of suspect chemicals, group says
- 7.11.02 Phthalates in cosmetics are suspect, but carcinogens even more so, warns Dr. Samuel S. Epstein, M.D.
- 7.10.02 First-time product tests find harmful phthalates in many popular fragrances, hair products and deodorants
- 7.10.02 Environmental group tests beauty products for chemicals
- 7.10.02 Cosmetics full of suspect chemicals, report claims
- 7.9.02 Cosmetics ingredient said to cause birth defects
- 7.4.02 Are your beauty products killing you?
- 6.16.02 Tainted Fish Warnings Soar
- 5.8.02 Study Finds Far Less Pesticide Residue on Organic Produce
- 3.29.02 FDA panel to review seafood mercury warnings
- 3.18.02 Big Tuna's FDA Lunch
- 3.13.02 Eating Well: Second Thoughts on Mercury in Fish
- 3.5.02 Mercury: FDA Warning Criticized; Maine Court Case Begins
- 3.4.02 Reconsidering a federal fish advisory
- 3.1.02 Experts to Review FDA Fish Warning
- 3.1.02 Senators write FDA: Is seafood safe?
- 3.1.02 FDA defends fish warning, plans independent review
- 1.13.02 Environmentalists question EPA's priorities
- 1.7.02 A Teflon Correspondent
- 12.4.01 Perchlorate levels high at ANPI monitoring well
- 10.20.01 Concerns raised over tuna intake
- 10.14.01 TNRCC tightens requirements for perchlorate levels
- 8.18.01 Perchlorate may threaten Santa Ana River
- 8.12.01 Rocket Fuel Peril Studied
- 8.6.01 Study finds perchlorate in New Mexico water
- 7.31.01 EPA to take 240 years to clean Superfund site
- 7.30.01 Environmental group wants much tighter perchlorate restrictions
- 7.30.01 People not warned about mercury in fish
- 7.17.01 Don't use people as lab rats
- 7.16.01 Group claims water contaminated by rocket fuel
- 7.16.01 Toxin in drinking water of millions
- 7.14.01 Pollutant in water goes unregulated
- 5.14.01 Gold Rush leaves state toxic legacy
- 5.13.01 No real tally of what's an unsafe dose
- 5.9.01 F.D.A. Cautions Against Eating Certain Fish During Pregnancy
- 5.9.01 Mercury in Fish: What's Too Much?
- 4.17.01 Fishing for Danger
- 4.13.01 Groups question guidelines on fish
- 4.13.01 Cut Back on Tuna, Experts Urge
- 4.13.01 U.S. guidelines don't protect young from mercury in fish, groups say
- 4.13.01 Report Questions Seafood Mercury Levels for Pregnancy
- 4.13.01 Groups Warn of Mercury in Seafood