Policy Plate: What Would a "Healthy Food" Bill Look Like?
Environmental Working Group President Ken Cook and senior food and agriculture analyst Kari Hamerschlag penned an op-ed in Sunday’s San Francisco Chronicle:
If you believe the government ought to play an aggressive role in the nation's economic life, admit it: You're a liberal. But you're probably not as liberal as the average Republican member of the House Agriculture Committee.
Thanks to their generosity with your tax dollars, the government has shelled out a quarter of a trillion dollars since 1995 in federal farm subsidies to grain and cotton farmers and landowners. (Go to farm.ewg.org for a list of every recipient and the amount each received.)
Right now, the farm subsidy lobby and its friends on Capitol Hill are on track to write a costly, ill-conceived new chapter to this unhappy history of bankrolling industrial commodity crops. But it doesn't have to be that way. Instead, we can invest in healthier eating and a cleaner environment. In the bargain, we can help keep 20 million kids from going hungry, give a huge boost to California agriculture, save taxpayers money and support family farmers.
What would a "healthy food" bill look like?
Read here what a healthy food bill would look like.
- The Washington Post editorial board weighed in on the Senate farm bill over the weekend, saying: “federal crop insurance overprotects, to put it mildly.”
- The Land Stewardship Project had tough words about the Senate farm bill’s anemic conservation title.
- The Tampa Bay, Fla. Fox TV affiliate looked at how badly broken federal farm and food policy has become.
- Respected Cato Institute trade policy analyst Sallie James voiced concern about the glaring lack of transparency in government -subsidized crop insurance.
- Web developer and farm bill advocate Marjorie Roswell has built an online farm bill primer.
Tweet of the day:
Go here to sign up
Tips? Email us at email@example.com