EWG INVESTIGATION
Findings
About The Data
News Release
EWG Statement, 03/10/2008
Related News Clips
WHAT'S IN YOUR WATER?
Find Your Water Company
NATIONAL SUMMARY
Quality Varies Across the U.S.
CONTAMINANTS DATABASE
Find a Contaminant
Credits
Sign up to receive email updates from EWG
|
|
Status: Regulated - EPA has established a maximum legal limit in tapwater for this contaminant. Nitrite is a chemical that enters water from fertilizer runoff, leaching septic tanks, and erosion of natural deposits. Potential health impacts associated with Nitrite include kidney toxicity and reproductive toxicity. Sources of Nitrite:  | Agriculture (pesticides, fertilizer, factory farms) |  | Sprawl and Urban Areas (road runoff, lawn pesticides, human waste) |  | Industry |  | Naturally Occurring (naturally present but increased for lands denuded by sprawl, agriculture, or industrial development) |
An Environmental Working Group analysis of Nitrite tests reported by 21,308 public water suppliers in 40 states shows that between 1998 and 2003, 33.5 million people in 3,181 communities drank water contaminated with Nitrite. In 87 of these communities, tap water was contaminated at levels above health-based thresholds. Exposure Summary 33,468,797 | People drinking water contaminated with Nitrite | 3,181 | Communities served water contaminated with Nitrite | 707,975 | People drinking water contaminated with Nitrite over health based limits | 87 | Communities served water with Nitrite above health based limits |
|
Table. Nitrite Exposure by State708 thousand Americans in 22 states were served tap water contaminated with Nitrite at levels above health-based limits between 1998 and 2003. | State | Water suppliers with Nitrite contamination | Water suppliers reporting Nitrite above health-based limits |
|---|
| Systems | Population | Systems | Population |
|---|
| Utah | 262 | 3,117,544 | 28 | 586,839 | | California | 114 | 3,799,382 | 1 | 45,205 | | Iowa | 63 | 332,857 | 12 | 15,926 | | Kentucky | 77 | 947,346 | 2 | 14,019 | | New Jersey | 34 | 1,627,955 | 1 | 12,600 | | Indiana | 126 | 1,189,803 | 6 | 10,886 | | Illinois | 159 | 657,257 | 10 | 6,113 | | Washington | 50 | 162,921 | 5 | 3,531 | | Minnesota | 44 | 177,993 | 2 | 2,142 | | Idaho | 32 | 61,641 | 1 | 1,611 | | New Hampshire | 15 | 27,060 | 1 | 1,300 | | South Dakota | 13 | 12,747 | 2 | 1,249 | | Florida | 307 | 4,637,816 | 3 | 1,230 | | Pennsylvania | 262 | 420,028 | 2 | 1,146 | | Arizona | 32 | 1,485,672 | 1 | 1,017 | | New York | 25 | 68,650 | 2 | 910 | | North Carolina | 90 | 354,946 | 1 | 775 | | Ohio | 18 | 186,982 | 2 | 773 | | Colorado | 47 | 430,970 | 2 | 260 | | Texas | 228 | 5,708,988 | 1 | 255 | | Michigan | 707 | 1,815,229 | 1 | 113 | | Nevada | 17 | 1,363,920 | 1 | 75 | | Massachusetts | 138 | 1,827,700 | 0 | 0 | | Virginia | 2 | 1,590,000 | 0 | 0 | | Wisconsin | 215 | 969,221 | 0 | 0 | | Wyoming | 27 | 109,238 | 0 | 0 | | New Mexico | 8 | 106,593 | 0 | 0 | | Alabama | 17 | 106,445 | 0 | 0 | | Maine | 27 | 71,635 | 0 | 0 | | South Carolina | 4 | 71,329 | 0 | 0 | | Rhode Island | 1 | 19,000 | 0 | 0 | | Alaska | 3 | 2,453 | 0 | 0 | | Montana | 8 | 2,424 | 0 | 0 | | Delaware | 2 | 2,165 | 0 | 0 | | Nebraska | 2 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | | Oregon | 2 | 670 | 0 | 0 | | Oklahoma | 3 | 562 | 0 | 0 | | Total | 3,181 | 33,468,797 | 87 | 707,975 |
|---|
Table. The most polluted communities708,000 Americans in 87 communities were served tap water contaminated with Nitrite above health based limits between 1998 and 2003 Ranked by highest average Nitrite level | Rank | System
| Population Served
| Positive test results of total reported tests
| Average Level (Range) |
|---|
| 1 | PA American Merlin Hills Reading, PA | 600 | 1 of 1 | 6.7 ppm (6.7 to 6.7 ppm) | | 2 | West Otter Lake Estates Fort Wayne, IN | 73 | 1 of 1 | 5 ppm (5 to 5 ppm) | | 3 | Robins Nest Cedar Lake, IN | 270 | 1 of 1 | 5 ppm (5 to 5 ppm) | | 4 | Greene Co. - Southwest Reg Public Water Xenia, OH | 558 | 1 of 1 | 4.6 ppm (4.6 to 4.6 ppm) | | 5 | Cannelton Utilities Cannelton, IN | 2,280 | 1 of 1 | 4.46 ppm (4.46 to 4.46 ppm) | | 6 | Vevay Water Department Vevay, IN | 1,735 | 1 of 1 | 4.29 ppm (4.29 to 4.29 ppm) | | 7 | Mountain Green Wtr Assn Mtn Green, UT | 80 | 1 of 1 | 3.53 ppm (3.53 to 3.53 ppm) | | 8 | Wilkinson Water Company Morgan, UT | 260 | 4 of 4 | 3.31 ppm (0.6 to 7.75 ppm) | | 9 | City of Glenns Ferry Water Glenns Ferry, ID | 1,611 | 1 of 2 | 3.01 ppm (0 to 6.02 ppm) | | 10 | Golden West Mobile Manor Vancouver, WA | 300 | 1 of 2 | 2.9 ppm (0 to 5.8 ppm) |
Next --> Health based limits for Nitrite
| Health Limit | Limit Value | Limit Description |
|---|
| Maximum Contaminant Limit (MCL) | 1 ppm | The enforceable standard which defines the highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as close to health-based limits (Maximum Contaminant Level Goals, or MCLGs) as feasible using the best available analytical and treatment technologies and taking cost into consideration. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | | Maximum Contaminant Limit Goal (MCLG) | 1 ppm | A non-enforceable health goal that is set at a level at which no known or anticipated adverse effect on the health of persons occurs and which allows an adequate margin of safety. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | | California Public Health Goals | 1 ppm | Defined by the State of California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) as the level of contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. For acutely toxic substances, levels are set at which scientific evidence indicates that no known or anticipated adverse effects on health will occur, plus an adequate margin-of safety. PHGs for carcinogens or other substances which can cause chronic disease shall be based solely on health effects without regard to cost impacts and shall be set at levels which OEHHA has determined do not pose any significant risk to health. | | Children's health-based limit for 1-day exposure | 1 ppm | Concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse, noncarcinogenic health effects for up to one day of exposure. The One-Day health-based limit (or Health Advisory, HA) is typically set to protect a 10-kg child consuming 1 liter of water per day. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | | Children's health-based limit for 10-day exposure | 1 ppm | Concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse, noncarcinogenic effects for up to ten days of exposure. The Ten-Day health-based limit (or Health Advisory, HA) is typically set to protect a 10-kg child consuming 1 liter of water per day. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | Testing Summary for Nitrite Water suppliers report an average of 0.6 Nitrite tests per year. 18,443 water suppliers failed to report
any Nitrite tests at all. | Are tests routinely required for Nitrite by federal law? | Yes | | Water suppliers reporting tests for Nitrite (1998-2003): | 21,308 of 39,751 | | Average testing rate for water supplier reporting tests (1998-2003): | 0.6 per year |
|
Nitrite Violations Table. 1.0 percent of all water suppliers violated safe drinking water standards for Nitrite between 1998 and 2003 | Violation Type | Violations | Systems |
|---|
| Any Violation (1998-2003) | 877 | 590 | | (1.0% of all suppliers) | | Testing violations (1998-2003) | 856 | 578 | | (1.0% of all suppliers) | | Reporting violations (1998-2003) | 5 | 5 | | (< 0.1% of all suppliers) | | Violations of tap water pollution standards (1998-2003) | 16 | 15 | | (< 0.1% of all suppliers) |
|