header graphic


EWG INVESTIGATION

 

Findings

About The Data

News Release

EWG Statement, 03/10/2008

Related News Clips


WHAT'S IN YOUR WATER?

 

Find Your Water Company


NATIONAL SUMMARY

 

Quality Varies Across the U.S.


CONTAMINANTS DATABASE

 

Find a Contaminant

 

 

Credits

 

Sign up to receive email updates from EWG






 

National Contaminant Report

Copper

Return to National Report

Status: For this chemical EPA has established a non-enforceable guideline called a "secondary standard," regulating it for aesthetic or cosmetic concerns (taste, odor, tooth discoloration, etc.)

Copper is a contaminant that enters water by corrosion of household plumbing systems; erosion of natural deposits. Potential health impacts associated with Copper include cardiovascular or blood toxicity, developmental toxicity, gastrointestinal or liver toxicity, kidney toxicity, reproductive toxicity, and respiratory toxicity. [read more]

Sources of Copper:
Sprawl and UrbanSprawl and Urban Areas (road runoff, lawn pesticides, human waste)
Naturally OccurringNaturally Occurring (naturally present but increased for lands denuded by sprawl, agriculture, or industrial development)

An Environmental Working Group analysis of Copper tests reported by 20,340 public water suppliers in 37 states shows that between 1998 and 2003, 77.9 million people in 12,210 communities drank water contaminated with Copper. In 1,402 of these communities, tap water was contaminated at levels above health-based thresholds.

Exposure Summary

77,892,155

People drinking water contaminated with Copper

12,210

Communities served water contaminated with Copper

4,398,112

People drinking water contaminated with Copper over health based limits

1,402

Communities served water with Copper above health based limits


Table. Copper Exposure by State

4.4 million Americans in 29 states were served tap water contaminated with Copper at levels above health-based limits between 1998 and 2003.

StateWater suppliers with Copper contaminationWater suppliers reporting Copper above health-based limits
SystemsPopulationSystemsPopulation
Wisconsin1,0383,764,6114001,104,399
Washington1,3733,348,635237660,996
Minnesota5497,1494494,187
Iowa8262,275,687171383,610
Nebraska5281,373,73890370,821
Ohio2302,514,35030205,929
New Mexico136927,71910182,202
New York231442,17365116,088
Michigan7492,552,38663108,861
Arizona4344,502,42423108,524
New Jersey2064,530,34913107,830
Illinois1751,278,41331103,099
Kentucky3404,716,03011102,479
Idaho41315,6732465,725
Texas2,17113,764,9081556,418
Tennessee1131,710,986242,124
North Dakota187360,4235740,207
Maine333550,0933625,789
Arkansas4302,542,115621,235
Virginia193211,4283119,906
Pennsylvania64296,5671315,711
Utah62939,093615,225
Missouri1,2782,740,6682015,107
Oklahoma181294,4901112,541
Nevada1742,145,66138,270
Colorado3513,367,655105,538
Montana17105,14553,304
New Hampshire26193,74081,068
California27714,812,3137919
Florida1416,30300
Alabama18156,04500
Alaska15141,31700
Delaware3100,12300
South Carolina23,10500
Wyoming264000
Total12,21077,892,1551,4024,398,112

Table. The most polluted communities

4.4 million Americans in 1,402 communities were served tap water contaminated with Copper above health based limits between 1998 and 2003

Ranked by highest average Copper level

RankSystem Population Served Positive test results of total reported tests Average Level
(Range)
1Altona Correctional Facility
Altona, NY
8801 of 19000 ppb
(9000 to 9000 ppb)
2Millbrook Village
Millbrook, NY
2,1002 of 27384.5 ppb
(769 to 14000 ppb)
3White Lake Estates
Tamworth, NH
2501 of 14890 ppb
(4890 to 4890 ppb)
4Fort Campbell Water System
Ft Campbell, KY
40,0001 of 23450 ppb
(0 to 6900 ppb)
5Fort Mc Coy South Post
Fort Mccoy, WI
1403 of 32417 ppb
(34 to 7000 ppb)
6Cullom
Cullom, IL
5701 of 12400 ppb
(2400 to 2400 ppb)
7Stockport Water Department #2 (consolida
Hudson, NY
3,1002 of 22395 ppb
(1560 to 3230 ppb)
8City of Wolf Point Water
Wolf Point, MT
2,8801 of 12330 ppb
(2330 to 2330 ppb)
9Cold Spring Water Company
Lamoine, ME
1388 of 82246.81 ppb
(0.5 to 5900 ppb)
10Basin County Water and Sewer District
Basin, MT
2001 of 11960 ppb
(1960 to 1960 ppb)

  Next -->

Health based limits for Copper

Health LimitLimit ValueLimit Description
Maximum Contaminant Limit Goal (MCLG)1300 ppbA non-enforceable health goal that is set at a level at which no known or anticipated adverse effect on the health of persons occurs and which allows an adequate margin of safety. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
California Public Health Goals170 ppbDefined by the State of California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) as the level of contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. For acutely toxic substances, levels are set at which scientific evidence indicates that no known or anticipated adverse effects on health will occur, plus an adequate margin-of safety. PHGs for carcinogens or other substances which can cause chronic disease shall be based solely on health effects without regard to cost impacts and shall be set at levels which OEHHA has determined do not pose any significant risk to health.
EPA Human Health Water Quality Criteria1300 ppbWater quality criteria set by the US EPA provide guidance for states and tribes authorized to establish water quality standards under the Clean Water Act (CWA) to protect human health. These are non-enforceable standards based upon exposure by both drinking water and the contribution of water contamination to other consumed foods. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations1000 ppbA National Secondary Drinking Water Regulation is a non-enforceable guideline regarding contaminants that may cause cosmetic effects (such as taste, odor, or color). Some states choose to adopt them as enforceable standards. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Testing Summary for Copper

Water suppliers report an average of 0.6 Copper tests per year. 19,411 water suppliers failed to report any Copper tests at all.

Are tests routinely required for Copper by federal law?Yes
Water suppliers reporting tests for Copper (1998-2003):20,340 of 39,751
Average testing rate for water supplier reporting tests (1998-2003):0.6 per year


Copper Violations

Table. < 0.1 percent of all water suppliers violated safe drinking water standards for Copper between 1998 and 2003

Violation TypeViolationsSystems
Any Violation (1998-2003)44
(< 0.1% of all suppliers)
Testing violations (1998-2003)44
(< 0.1% of all suppliers)